No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Google Security Operations Logo

Google Security Operations Reviews

Vendor: Google
4.4 out of 5

What is Google Security Operations?

Featured Google Security Operations reviews

Google Security Operations mindshare

As of June 2026, the mindshare of Google Security Operations in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category stands at 3.7%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Google Security Operations3.7%
Microsoft Sentinel9.8%
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR8.7%
Other77.8%
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Jun 7, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
University
7%
Outsourcing Company
6%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
6%
Retailer
6%
Construction Company
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Media Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%

Compare Google Security Operations with alternative products

Learn more about Google Security Operations

Google Security Operations customers

Related questions

 
Google Security Operations Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Technical Lead at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I find Google Security Operations (Chronicle SecOps) excellent for SOC/SIEM, praising its parsing, analytics, and SOAR. While I appreciate its stability and cost, I desire improved silent log monitoring and easier third-party integrations, and customer service could be better.
Senior Manager Product Strategy at a outsourcing company with 11-50 employees4.5I find Google Security Operations excellent for client security, especially for threat detection and hunting. It's stable, scalable, and has fast support. Setup is simple, and it provides faster threat response, meeting compliance. My overall rating is nine out of ten.
Cloud Senior lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees5.0I use Google SecOps primarily for real-time threat detection, which is enhanced when integrated with Mandiant. While it's effective, its threat descriptions need improvement compared to Microsoft Sentinel, although Sentinel doesn't support GCP. Google remains my chosen provider.
SOC Director at Ingalls Information Security5.0Chronicle SOAR is essential for our SOC, enhancing alert orchestration and automation. Its playbook builder and integration capabilities are invaluable. We've switched from a less robust platform and look forward to its upcoming machine learning enhancements.
Security Compliance Lead at a computer software company with 51-200 employees4.5I find Siemplify, now part of Google Clinical SecOps, essential for streamlining tasks like configuring playbooks and automating incident response. Its integration abilities enhance flexibility, though minor improvements, like better search functionality, could further boost usability.
Information information analyst at Seeton3.5I use Siemplify in over 20 use cases, and its most valuable feature is the ability to create playbooks. However, building these playbooks and improving integration can be challenging, particularly with API connections. Google is the cloud provider.