Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Security Hub vs Google Security Operations comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.6, while Google is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 8.1% mindshare in SOAR, compared to Google’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Google users who would recommend it.
AWS Security Hub
Read 26 AWS Security Hub reviews
  • 7,414 Views
  • 2,891 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
Google Security Operations
Read 4 Google Security Operations reviews
  • 1,447 Views
  • 752 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Google Security Operations and AWS Security Hub are competing in the security management domain, aiming to enhance security operations. Data comparisons show that AWS Security Hub has the upper hand due to its robust features and extensive integration capabilities.

Features: Google Security Operations is known for advanced threat detection, seamless integration with Google Cloud services, and effective alarm management for common threats. AWS Security Hub offers comprehensive integration with AWS services, real-time alert capabilities, and a unified dashboard for security alerts.

Room for Improvement: Google Security Operations could improve its integrations with non-Google services, enhance its real-time monitoring features outside the Google ecosystem, and broaden its detection pipeline for more complex threats. AWS Security Hub could benefit from simplifying its user interface, making its system less cluttered, and providing more user-friendly navigation options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Security Operations provides straightforward deployment within Google Cloud and benefits from reliable support resources. AWS Security Hub has a more intricate deployment process but is supported by a vast community and detailed documentation to assist users.

Pricing and ROI: Google Security Operations typically offers lower setup costs, particularly beneficial for businesses already utilizing Google Cloud. Despite a higher initial setup cost, AWS Security Hub often results in a greater return on investment due to its extensive features and integration capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Security Hub vs. Google Security Operations Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
AWS Security Hub vs. Google Security Operations
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,095 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Security Hub
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
5th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (13th)
Google Security Operations
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
14th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (25th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of AWS Security Hub is 8.1%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Security Operations is 3.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
AWS Security Hub8.1%
Google Security Operations3.1%
Other88.8%
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
 

Featured Reviews

Karthik Ekambaram - PeerSpot reviewer
Has helped identify misconfigurations and prioritize risks but lacks multi-cloud support and deeper integration features
AWS Security Hub cannot scale up to multiple different cloud environments; it only works for AWS. There are other products in the market for CSPM that can give you multi-cloud environment misconfigurations, even Microsoft for that matter. Regarding the integration of AWS Security Hub with third-party tools, I am not certain whether we can integrate them, but there is no need to do so. However, AWS Security Hub cannot integrate with other cloud providers, so it only supports the AWS environment. The compliance checks within AWS Security Hub are good, but we don't use them much. We utilize compliance frameworks such as CIS compliance frameworks and ISO 27017 framework, which are beneficial, but it can improve in other areas too, such as including NIST and other frameworks beyond just ISO and CIS. Improvements can be applicable for scalability, particularly on integration with multi-cloud environments, and compliance frameworks can be added for more variety as well. The unified dashboard in AWS Security Hub is adequate; I cannot say it is exceptional, but the content available in the dashboards is satisfactory for now.
Read full review
reviewer2203269 - PeerSpot reviewer
Real-time threat detection and alarm management have improved security operations
Google SecOps is extremely useful for threat detection and hunting. It provides a detailed pipeline for detection and is beneficial for real-time threat monitoring when integrated with Mandiant. The tool's integration capabilities are effective, and it helps in managing alarms for normal threats efficiently. Overall, Google SecOps is a very useful service for security operations.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Currently, our organization utilizes AWS for various purposes, including SaaS (Software as a Service), PaaS (Platform as a Service), and hosting applications in the cloud. We develop our applications and use AWS services as a platform for basic functions and secondary development needs. Additionally, we rely on PaaS for accounting services. Approximately, 50% of our applications are hosted in the cloud environment, making it a significant part of our current setup."
"AWS Security Hub has very good integration features. It allows for AWS native services integration, and it helps us to integrate some of the services outside of AWS. They have partners, such as Amazon Preferred Network Partners (APN). If you have different security tools around APN, we can integrate those findings with AWS Security Hub reducing the need to refer to different portals or different UIs. You can have AWS Security Hub act as a single common go-to dashboard."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the scanning of all the cloud environments and most of the compliances available in the cloud."
"Within AWS Security Hub, there is a feature for aggregating and prioritizing security findings which allows for better risk prioritization based on misconfiguration, as they know AWS thoroughly."
"It's a security posture management tool from AWS. Basically, it identifies misconfigurations, similar to Trusted Advisor but on a larger scale."
"Cloudposse is a valuable feature as it guarantees my security."
"I rate Security Hub ten out of ten for stability."
"I find all of the features to be highly valuable."
More AWS Security Hub pros
"The most valuable feature of Siemplify is the playbooks that can be created."
"Without hyperbole, I have never, in my entire career, encountered a vendor or a vendor community as awesome as Siemplify. Siemplify and the Siemplify Community quite literally made it possible for our SOC to increase almost five-fold in our number of clients and number of analysts and to go from a Monday to Friday 9-5 shop to a 24/7 shop all in the span of under a year and a half and all while continually adding capabilities and improving the services we offer to our clients."
"Google SecOps is extremely useful for threat detection and hunting."
"Overall, Google SecOps is a very useful service for security operations."
"The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user interface is generally straightforward, although recent changes may require some adjustment and Siemplify's integrations and capabilities offer potential support for various compliance requirements."
 

Cons

"There is room for improvement in implementing AI capabilities."
"I would like a more fine-grained capability for creating custom rules and a more user-friendly experience programmatically in writing queries and configuring custom security rules, making it quicker and easier."
"AWS Security Hub cannot scale up to multiple different cloud environments; it only works for AWS."
"AWS Security Hub should improve the time it takes to update. It takes a long period of time when updating. It can take 24 hours sometimes to update. Additionally, when integrating this solution with more security tools, takes time."
"We need more granular-level customizations to enable or disable the rules in AWS Security Hub."
"The telemetry doesn't always go into the control center. When you have multiple instances running in AWS, you need a control tower to take feeds from Security Hub and analyze your results. Sometimes exemptions aren't passed between the control tower and Security Hub. The configuration gets mixed up or you don't get the desired results."
"Security Hub is currently not worth investing in, as it requires more configurations and integration with other services to work effectively."
"Security Hub is currently not worth investing in, as it requires more configurations and integration with other services to work effectively."
More AWS Security Hub cons
"The main improvement could be in the accuracy and detail provided in threat descriptions."
"I'm inclined to say that I'd love to see some Machine Learning capabilities integrated into the platform, however, I just attended a demo this morning where Siemplify gave a sneak peek into some Machine Learning capabilities that they are currently developing and have roadmapped for release soon."
"We often encounter minor issues that could be improved, but we maintain communication with the developers and submit feature requests. Recently, I requested enhancements such as improved search functionality within playbooks and expanded options for exporting case data."
"The main improvement could be in the accuracy and detail provided in threat descriptions."
"Building the playbooks could be easier and the integration could improve. It is a difficult process, such as what API connections need to be made."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Security Hub is not an expensive tool. I would consider it to be a cheap solution. AWS Security Hub follows the PAYG pricing model, meaning you will have to pay for whatever you use."
"The pricing is fine. It is not an expensive tool."
"The price of AWS Security Hub is average compared to other solutions."
"Security Hub is not an expensive solution."
"The price of the solution is not very competitive but it is reasonable."
"There are multiple subscription models, like yearly, monthly, and packaged."
"The cost is based on the number of compliances, core checks, and services required, and for more than 10,000 recommendations, the charge is just one dollar."
"AWS Security Hub's pricing is pretty reasonable."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,095 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user186927 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 16, 2015
Cybereason vs. Interset vs. SQRRL
Capture DB - they all use NoSQL db and hence solve the ad hoc query and 'go back in time' problem with current best of breed SIEM and DLP solutions that rely on real time analysis of incoming logs (and don't store them). This means deeper and quicker iterative threat analysis and assessment…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Azure Sentinel or AWS Security Hub?
We like that Azure Sentinel does not require as much maintenance as legacy SIEMs that are on-premises. Azure Sentinel is auto-scaling - you will not have to worry about performance impact, you will...
See all answers
What do you like most about AWS Security Hub?
The most valuable features of the solution are the scanning of all the cloud environments and most of the compliances available in the cloud.
See all answers
What needs improvement with AWS Security Hub?
Regarding how Amazon can improve AWS Security Hub, they have numerous services that are discriminated individually and grouped into packages. However, the sheer number of services can be overwhelmi...
See all answers
What do you like most about Siemplify?
The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user inter...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Siemplify?
The pricing for Google SecOps and Microsoft Sentinel is almost the same, with no significant differences.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Siemplify?
The main improvement could be in the accuracy and detail provided in threat descriptions. Google SecOps reports could be more detailed, similar to the comprehensive descriptions provided by Microso...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Sentinel vs AWS Security Hub Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs AWS Security Hub
Compared 36% of the time
Wiz vs AWS Security Hub Logo
Wiz vs AWS Security Hub
Compared 11% of the time
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs AWS Security Hub Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs AWS Security Hub
Compared 7% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs AWS Security Hub Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs AWS Security Hub
Compared 6% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs AWS Security Hub Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs AWS Security Hub
Compared 3% of the time
More AWS Security Hub Competitors
Microsoft Sentinel vs Google Security Operations Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Google Security Operations
Compared 15% of the time
Google Chronicle Suite vs Google Security Operations Logo
Google Chronicle Suite vs Google Security Operations
Compared 14% of the time
Cortex XSIAM vs Google Security Operations Logo
Cortex XSIAM vs Google Security Operations
Compared 10% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Google Security Operations Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Google Security Operations
Compared 10% of the time
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Google Security Operations Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Google Security Operations
Compared 10% of the time
More Google Security Operations Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
AWS Security Hub
October 2025
AWS Security Hub reportDownload AWS Security Hub product report
Buyer's Guide
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
October 2025
Google Security Operations reportDownload Google Security Operations product report
 

Also Known As

SQRRL
Siemplify ThreatNexus
 

Overview

AWS Security Hub is a comprehensive security service that provides a centralized view of security alerts and compliance status across an AWS environment. It collects data from various AWS services, partner solutions, and AWS Marketplace products to provide a holistic view of security posture. With Security Hub, users can quickly identify and prioritize security issues, automate compliance checks, and streamline remediation efforts. 

The service offers a range of features including continuous monitoring, threat intelligence integration, and customizable dashboards. It also provides automated insights and recommendations to help users improve their security posture. Security Hub integrates with other AWS services like Amazon GuardDuty, AWS Config, and AWS Macie to provide a unified security experience. Additionally, it supports integration with third-party security tools through its API, allowing users to leverage their existing security investments. 

With its user-friendly interface and powerful capabilities, AWS Security Hub is a valuable tool for organizations looking to enhance their security and compliance posture in the cloud.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Google Security Operations provides advanced threat detection and response capabilities. Tailored for cybersecurity professionals, it integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure, offering a proactive approach to managing security challenges.

Designed for enterprises requiring robust threat management, Google Security Operations harnesses the power of Google's infrastructure to deliver comprehensive insights into potential vulnerabilities and attack vectors. Leveraging AI and machine learning, users benefit from enhanced accuracy and speed in identifying threats, making it a crucial tool in maintaining cybersecurity resilience. Its adaptability allows businesses to customize security protocols, ensuring alignment with specific security strategies.

What are the most crucial features of Google Security Operations?

  • Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify potential threats quickly.
  • Automated Response: Streamlines response measures to mitigate risks efficiently.
  • Scalability: Designed to grow with the security demands of an organization.
  • Integration Capabilities: Easily connects with existing security tools and platforms.

What benefits do users gain from Google Security Operations?

  • Improved Security Posture: Strengthens defenses against emerging threats.
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for extensive manual monitoring efforts.
  • Enhanced Decision Making: Provides detailed insights for informed security strategies.
  • Operational Efficiency: Increases the effectiveness of cybersecurity teams.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Google Security Operations is implemented to address specific regulatory and compliance requirements. Its adaptive features support cybersecurity frameworks, ensuring data protection and risk management standards are met effectively.

Google
 

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Frame.io, GoDaddy, Realtor.com
FedEx Mondelez Intenrational Check Point Trustwave Atos Cyberint Bae Systems Crowe Longwall Security Telefonica Nordea HCL
Buyer's Guide
AWS Security Hub vs. Google Security Operations
September 2025
Free Report: AWS Security Hub vs. Google Security Operations
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Security Hub vs. Google Security Operations and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,095 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our AWS Security Hub vs. Google Security Operations report.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.