What is our primary use case?
We primarily used the solution for endpoint security.
What is most valuable?
The overall security capability of the product is pretty reliable. It's a traditional product in terms of all its features that are common on the market. It was good, easy to configure, and easy to use. From that perspective, it is a pretty decent product.
It did a very good job whenever it detected viruses and malware.
It was easy to set up.
The capabilities of the solution are rapidly improving.
What needs improvement?
I saw a bunch of false positives which need to be fixed. They were not detailed. These false positives were not happening with other products which I saw. These false positives shouldn't even be there. They need to take a look at why they were happening and resolve the issue.
There may be some configuration changes required, depending on the use case.
The pricing could always be better.
Easier functionality would be better.
I'd like to see fewer add-ons and a more basic solution under a single product. Right now, everybody shows EDR as a separate thing.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
In terms of stability, the performance parameters do come into play. It's good on the regular office front, however, on the development side, if somebody is using it in a development environment, they need to make some configuration changes in terms of what directories should be excluded from the real-time scanning. I had to do that kind of stuff. I don't do that with the Microsoft product, for example. It runs, and it scans the entire system with no issues.
The solution is stable. Regular updates were available in the product versions. They were updated, and they gave regular signature updates also so that the product checked all the boxes.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
For a mid-size company of a couple of hundred users of up to around 500 users, the solution will be fine. Even if you have a couple of thousand users, it still will be fine. Especially when you're dealing with the cloud, it scales well. The service provider manages the instance and you don't have to worry about a drop in quality.
How are customer service and support?
On the technical support front, I bought the product from Hungary. The support is done by the partners; the support is not coming from the OEM. That is a very distinctive thing over here, which has to be noted. Many resellers have support capabilities. Therefore, we didn't deal directly with ESET. We would talk directly to partners. I've always appreciated their work.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I had Microsoft Defender to use, so that is why I moved away from ESET.
I've also used McAfee, Trend Micro, and Symantec.
Maybe two years back, ESET was a product that would be a mid-range product. Sentinel One and ESET maybe would compete with each other along with Kaspersky and stuff like that. In contrast, McAfee, Symantec, Defender, and Trend Micro would come in the top bracket in terms of the top performance, along with CrowdStrike and stuff like that.
Nowadays, that scene has changed drastically. Defender is there as a professional, full-throttle product. That's one aspect. Symantec is still there on the top of the pile. McAfee is losing its place since they've messed up with the build and all the stuff. Trend Micro is also almost there on the top of the pile, yet not exactly on top of them, however, they're pretty much there. Brands like CrowdStrike, et cetera, are beginning to step in into the top of the pile in terms of their technology. ESET is also closing that gap in terms of their abilities.
How was the initial setup?
The setup is very simple. I have worked with other products like McAfee, Trend Micro, and Symantec, so I don't see any difference in terms of how the basic configuration has to be done. It's only the initial thing of understanding what is where in the product settings. It's as simple as that. Once you know that, you know one product pretty well. It's just a matter of a few hours of adapting to the product.
I'd rate the ease of setup at a four out of five.
I was able to implement and maintain the solution myself.
It is self-maintaining. That said, we'll have to make occasional checks administratively to ensure things keep working the way they are supposed to work.
What about the implementation team?
I handled the initial setup myself. I did not need to deal with any outside consultants or integrators.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I had a yearly subscription. In November, the subscription expired, and I stopped using it.
The price is pretty affordable. For 200 or so users, it might cost around $10,000 or so. That is for a first-time purchase. A renewal may come in at $7,000 to $8,000, or around 20% to 30% less. This is a rough estimate of what to expect.
My renewal, for 160 users, would have been about $6,000.
I'd rate the pricing three out of five in that they offer industry-standard pricing, and you can negotiate with them to work on the cost.
What other advice do I have?
I'm a consultant. I don't use it myself. I merely deploy it and work with clients that use it.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other