VIPRE Endpoint Security vs VMware Carbon Black Endpoint comparison

Why PeerSpot?

VIPRE Security and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. VIPRE Security is ranked #51, while Broadcom is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.0. VIPRE Security holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Broadcom’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of VIPRE Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint and VIPRE Endpoint Security compete in the endpoint protection category. User reviews indicate a slight preference for Carbon Black's overall performance and support, while VIPRE is noted for its ease of setup and use.

Features: VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is praised for its advanced threat detection, comprehensive logging capabilities, and superior threat intelligence. VIPRE Endpoint Security stands out for its user-friendly management, reliable malware protection, and simplicity and efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest VMware Carbon Black Endpoint could benefit from improved integration capabilities, more intuitive management tools, and a less complex interface. For VIPRE Endpoint Security, recommendations include enhanced reporting features, faster response times, and more advanced threat detection.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's deployment process is noted for being complex and requiring significant technical expertise, though customer service is highly rated. VIPRE Endpoint Security has an easier setup process with equally effective support, making it more accessible for users with varying technical levels.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has higher upfront costs but is perceived as a worthwhile long-term investment due to its advanced capabilities and support. VIPRE Endpoint Security offers competitive pricing and delivers consistent value, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. While Carbon Black's ROI is tied to its advanced features, VIPRE offers solid performance at a lower cost.

To learn more, read our detailed VIPRE Endpoint Security vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

VIPRE Endpoint Security vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,749 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VIPRE Endpoint Security is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is 2.1%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint	2.1%
VIPRE Endpoint Security	0.8%
Other	93.3%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Shawn S

IT Security Analyst at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees

Easy to upgrade and manage but needs better reporting

There just was a lot about it that I didn't like. For blocking certain items, such as USBs, we felt like it was slowing down the network too much. Therefore we utilized a GPO for blocking things like that instead. Our environment was big and I didn't feel like the console did a good enough job. We outgrew the product. I've been asking for a change for a couple of years now, and it finally got approved. In terms of the console, I had over 2000 endpoints in there and there wasn't even a search feature for me to look through them. If I had to find where a policy was I had to sort in alphabetical order to find an endpoint that I wanted. They need to offer a search function within the console - maybe something that shows a "last connected" notice. That way, it's easier to manage obsolete machines that you don't need anymore. They had a very vague setting, like after so many days, when do you want us to remove these, you'd see them. I just wish the console was a little more responsive when I would do commands. The reports could have been better. The product would show a lot of endpoints as not communicating. That was another pain point. We constantly had to run an SQL query to clean up the database as I would know immediately when I was in the console, that it just wasn't being responsive. I could tell I was being given bad data and that we had to clean up the database. As soon as I would clean up that database, it was like a purging of the SQL database and it would become a lot more responsive. The problem was that our environment was too big. We're going through a growth spurt right now. In the end, the solution is small and much better suited for a small business. We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for. The product is based on an older model of signature files. It doesn't use any artificial intelligence or anything. It was slow to refresh the policies and computer scans. The larger we got, the more it became an issue. If a company stayed small, I'm not sure if they would have noticed.

Read full review

Paanob-Mahanarongchai

CTO at Microsoft

Improved incident investigation has supported response while core protection still needs progress

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint does not have easy integration, as there are many complexities with the Ribitava API, which is very deep. I rate this solution overall as a five or six on a scale from one to ten. I have integrated VMware Carbon Black Endpoint with other tools that are helpful. I think this solution should be targeted at small clients, because adoption will grow more with small businesses tomorrow.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has accelerated the response time for my security team, so we have been able to resolve issues faster than usual."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the user interface."

"Cortex XDR lets us manage several clients from the same console, and its endpoint defense is more advanced than traditional antivirus."

"The solution allows control over the user and his machine through Cortex XDR security policies."

"The anti-exploit is impenetrable. We chose Traps because it is the only product that we were not able to get anything past."

"It detected stuff that other things wouldn't detect."

"I generally believe that Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is probably the best in the market right now."

"Cortex covers everything I need. It's a perfect solution. Cortex provides a different level of visibility because it's an extended EDR, allowing you to grab logs from the network and firewalls. Palo Alto invented the concept of the extended EDR or XDR."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"In general, it was pretty easy to manage."

"It has improved the way our organization functions, made things run faster in our company, and has done a fantastic job of keeping our networks free of virus."

"It has low overhead as far as machine resources are concerned. Everything runs faster with VIPRE installed versus some of the competitors. It has also been pretty easy to use. It just runs and gives us reports. It also sends us alerts when there is something that we need to look at. It does its job, and you just look at the reports. In other ways, you just forget that it is there."

"Technical support was always very helpful and responsive."

"The solution is stable and the policy can be configured with flexibility, as it comes with its own pre-built standard policy and also allows us to write our own, which means the solution serves us going forward."

"The offline networking is the most important feature."

"The security, specifically the endpoint security that the solution provides, is its most valuable aspect."

"It gives you all of the information in a short and sweet fashion."

"Carbon Black works completely differently from other products; we tested different products and Carbon Black was selected because it does not remove a virus but kills any suspect operations and lets the admin check the scenario, effectively stopping any suspicious activity based on unusual behavior rather than signatures."

"One of the most valuable features is that it will block vulnerable sites. If there was a connection between one of our devices to a known malware site, it will block it."

"Using Open API, we were able to freely perform the necessary integration with our other security solutions."

"The most valuable asset is the time-lining capability for any breach activity."

More VMware Carbon Black Endpoint pros

Cons

"The downside to the solution is that there are a large number of false positives."

"It'll help if customization was easier."

"Although I would say this product is highly-rated, it could probably do more because nothing does everything that you want."

"It is an enterprise-level solution. Its price could be less expensive."

"I have run into some detection issues with Cortex XDR. It needs to be better at detection of internal attacks."

"Data privacy is a matter of concern. You have to be careful with data privacy, it can be sensitive and Cortex can have most of your access."

"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR does not detect malicious activity like in other anti-virus solutions like Trend Micro and Windows with Cisco."

"The solution could improve by providing better integration with their own products and others."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for."

"Their management interface is a little buggy as it will hang up and crash from time to time."

"Their management interface is a little buggy. It requires a few system resources on the management interface. Its reporting can also be better. Overall, the reports are pretty good. They patch some third-party software, but if they can expand what they do for reporting and patch enterprise software, it would be handy."

"The solution would be more effective if there was a way to block automatically based on behavior."

"The endpoint machines need improvement."

"But here, we hardly can take any kind of a report out of Carbon Black, so I think that should be something that should be more user-friendly."

"With the on-prem one, the bug has been reported by the community in early January or February, something like that, at the beginning of the year, and it's still not addressed. They have released two versions since then, and yet neither of them addresses this specific issue."

"The device control feature could also be compatible with the user’s profile as well."

"Right now, Carbon Black CB Defense doesn't support cloud computing and Kubernetes."

"The solution needs better overall compatibility with other products."

"They will most likely need to create or include a feature that checks the network."

More VMware Carbon Black Endpoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"The return on investment is from the user side because we have seen the performance of it increase the delivery time of the product if we are using too many web-based and on-premise applications. In indirect ways, we saw the return of investment in terms of performance and user satisfaction increase."

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

"I don't recall what the cost was, but it wasn't really that expensive."

"The price of the product is not very economical."

"In terms of the cost Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very expensive because we are a Mexican company and when you translate dollars to pesos the cost is very high. The solution is very expensive for Mexican companies. I understand that they have international prices, but I do not think it offsets the price enough for many companies in countries, such as Mexico. The amount it is reduced is not a massive percentage."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is quite an expensive solution."

"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Its price point has been phenomenal. Our previous solution from Trend Micro was triple the cost of it."

"VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is an expensive product."

"The license is annual. It's a standard license."

"The product’s price is less expensive than other vendors."

"The cost/benefit factor has great relevance in Cb Defense implementations."

"The licensing cost is on the more expensive side, but I thought it was worth it because they did a good job. It was one of the vendors I truly didn't have to worry about too much until this latest upgrade."

"It's reasonable in price"

"In terms of licensing costs, Carbon Black CB Defense was all associated with CROW and the services my company is using with them, so it came all-inclusive."

"The cost is a considerable factor, but the benefit factor is the most important. When you compare it with other products, the price is high. Carbon Black will negotiate the price."

More VMware Carbon Black Endpoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,749 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

21%

Financial Services Firm

University

Wholesaler/Distributor

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	50
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	57

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	33

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What to choose: an endpoint antivirus, an EDR solution or both?

I can recommend Carbon Black, an award-winning next-gen anti-virus (NGAV) and endpoint detection and response (EDR) s...

See all answers

What's the difference between Carbon Black CB Response and Carbon Black CB Defense?

Carbon Black offers two different levels of Endpoint Detection and Response. One is the VM Carbon Black Cloud Endpoin...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Carbon Black CB Defense?

My rating for the pricing of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is that it is not cheap, but it is also not as inexpensive ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 16% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Confluera vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 2% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 14% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

More VIPRE Endpoint Security Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs VMware Carbon Black Endpoint

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs VMware Carbon Black Endpoint

Compared 5% of the time

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs VMware Carbon Black Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VMware Carbon Black Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs VMware Carbon Black Endpoint

Compared 3% of the time

More VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

November 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

October 2026

Download VIPRE Endpoint Security product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint

October 2026

Download VMware Carbon Black Endpoint product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

VIPRE Cloud, VIPRE Endpoint Security Cloud Edition, VIPRE Endpoint Security Server Edition

Carbon Black CB Defense, Bit9, Confer

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

VIPRE Endpoint Security offers advanced protection tailored for business environments focusing on threat detection, prevention, and management. It's designed to safeguard endpoints from malware and cyber threats, delivering powerful security tools for optimal defense.

With its robust technology, VIPRE Endpoint Security caters to enterprises needing comprehensive security, ensuring responsive threat mitigation and simplified management. Its scalable architecture allows efficient deployment across networks, supporting complex IT infrastructures. Enhanced threat intelligence and rapid incident response make it a trusted choice for modern security challenges.

What are the most important features of VIPRE Endpoint Security?

Advanced Threat Protection: Provides real-time monitoring to detect and neutralize threats.
Centralized Management: Streamlines security management across all endpoints from a single interface.
Automatic Updates: Ensures endpoints are always protected with the latest security patches.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed analysis and visibility into security status and incidents.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews when evaluating VIPRE Endpoint Security?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides robust security without significant financial investment.
Time Efficiency: Reduces the time spent on managing security tasks and incidents.
Scalability: Easily accommodates growth within the organization, adapting to increased demands.
Enhanced Security Posture: Strengthens defenses against emerging threats, ensuring data protection.

VIPRE Endpoint Security is valued in industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, where data protection is critical. Its proactive threat detection and compliance features meet the stringent security requirements in these sectors, providing peace of mind and regulatory adherence while optimizing operational continuity.

VIPRE Security

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint uses behavioral analysis and cloud management to detect threats, stop suspicious activities, and ensure security with features like real-time monitoring and machine learning.

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint provides robust threat detection with centralized cloud management and behavioral analysis to prevent security breaches. Suitable for both cloud and on-premise environments, it enhances cybersecurity with seamless scaling, integrates with software for advanced threat hunting, and ensures policy management through application control.

What are the most important features of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint?

Behavioral Analysis: Identifies suspicious activities using behavior patterns.
Cloud Management: Centralizes security operations for efficiency.
Real-Time Monitoring: Offers continuous surveillance to catch threats early.
Machine Learning: Enhances threat detection with AI-driven insights.
Application Control: Manages policy enforcement easily.
Threat Hunting: Integrates with software for comprehensive analysis.

What benefits can be expected from VMware Carbon Black Endpoint?

Proactive Security: Prevents threats before they materialize.
Scalability: Adjusts to growing security needs effortlessly.
Improved Compliance: Helps maintain regulatory standards through advanced technologies.
Streamlined Management: Reduces time spent on security administration.

In industries like finance and healthcare, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is implemented to secure sensitive data from cyber threats. It supports organizations in minimizing risks associated with malware and ransomware, protecting their endpoint environments through AI-driven detection and real-time monitoring.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

College Station ISD, Mid-West Companies, Guardian Network Solutions

Netflix, Progress Residential, Indeed, Hologic, Gentle Giant, Samsung Research America

Buyer's Guide

VIPRE Endpoint Security vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint

November 2026

Free Report: VIPRE Endpoint Security vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint

Find out what your peers are saying about VIPRE Endpoint Security vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,749 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our VIPRE Endpoint Security vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.