Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs VIPRE Endpoint Security comparison

Trellix and VIPRE Security are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Trellix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.9, while VIPRE Security is ranked #62. Trellix holds a 3.9% mindshare in EPP, compared to VIPRE Security’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of VIPRE Security users who would recommend it.

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Read 158 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews

10,526 Views
7,895 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Read 2 VIPRE Endpoint Security reviews

555 Views
450 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 9, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and VIPRE Endpoint Security offer comprehensive protection for business environments. Data indicates that VIPRE's superior features make it a worthwhile investment for many businesses, despite Trellix having more favorable pricing and support.

Features: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is recognized for its integration capabilities, comprehensive threat intelligence, and effective support infrastructure. VIPRE Endpoint Security stands out with robust malware protection, intuitive management tools, and a user-friendly interface. VIPRE provides stronger security features, making it a preferred choice for those prioritizing threat defense.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix's deployment is noted for its flexibility and responsive customer service. VIPRE ensures rapid installation and an easy user experience with straightforward deployment. VIPRE's ease of deployment is beneficial, especially for organizations needing quick and hassle-free setup.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix usually comes with higher setup costs; however, its pricing is often viewed as justifiable due to the comprehensive capabilities offered. VIPRE presents a more cost-effective initial setup and attractive ROI outcomes. VIPRE offers a competitive value proposition with its cost-effectiveness and substantial security returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 863,776 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

158

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (10th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (9th)

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

62nd

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.9%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VIPRE Endpoint Security is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Abdullah Al Hadi

Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd

Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies

There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security ( /categories/endpoint-protection-platform-epp ) can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.

Read full review

Shawn S

IT Security Analyst with 11-50 employees

Easy to upgrade and manage but needs better reporting

There just was a lot about it that I didn't like. For blocking certain items, such as USBs, we felt like it was slowing down the network too much. Therefore we utilized a GPO for blocking things like that instead. Our environment was big and I didn't feel like the console did a good enough job. We outgrew the product. I've been asking for a change for a couple of years now, and it finally got approved. In terms of the console, I had over 2000 endpoints in there and there wasn't even a search feature for me to look through them. If I had to find where a policy was I had to sort in alphabetical order to find an endpoint that I wanted. They need to offer a search function within the console - maybe something that shows a "last connected" notice. That way, it's easier to manage obsolete machines that you don't need anymore. They had a very vague setting, like after so many days, when do you want us to remove these, you'd see them. I just wish the console was a little more responsive when I would do commands. The reports could have been better. The product would show a lot of endpoints as not communicating. That was another pain point. We constantly had to run an SQL query to clean up the database as I would know immediately when I was in the console, that it just wasn't being responsive. I could tell I was being given bad data and that we had to clean up the database. As soon as I would clean up that database, it was like a purging of the SQL database and it would become a lot more responsive. The problem was that our environment was too big. We're going through a growth spurt right now. In the end, the solution is small and much better suited for a small business. We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for. The product is based on an older model of signature files. It doesn't use any artificial intelligence or anything. It was slow to refresh the policies and computer scans. The larger we got, the more it became an issue. If a company stayed small, I'm not sure if they would have noticed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."

"McAfee EndPoint Security has a lot of good features that work well if they are implemented properly."

"A great console with a user-friendly GUI."

"The tool has contributed to improving our security posture. While it's just one part of our overall solution, it plays a crucial role. As we continue to evolve, we anticipate it becoming even more important alongside other aspects like network behavior and additional metrics."

"The endpoint security, antivirus and firewall are the most valuable features of Trellix Endpoint Security."

"It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts."

"We like the management of the ePO, and we like the management console."

"It's very stable and reliable."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

"It has low overhead as far as machine resources are concerned. Everything runs faster with VIPRE installed versus some of the competitors. It has also been pretty easy to use. It just runs and gives us reports. It also sends us alerts when there is something that we need to look at. It does its job, and you just look at the reports. In other ways, you just forget that it is there."

"In general, it was pretty easy to manage."

Cons

"What needs improvement in Trellix Endpoint Security is the reduction of resource consumption by the scanning feature. There should be daily signature updates for protection."

"It has very good integrations. However, its integration with Palo Alto was not good, and they seem to be working on it at the backend. It is not very resource-hungry, but it can be even better in terms of resource utilization. It could be improved in terms of efficiency, memory sizing, and disk consumption by agents."

"We have a lot of problems with the user experience and it's difficult to implement. MacAfee's better than the ancient anti-virus solutions but it's a little slow to resolve. Many files with malware were destroyed through the network, and MacAfee doesn't detect anything."

"Trellix lacked email protection when it was a McAfee product. They added this feature during the merger with FireEye, but it hasn't been fully integrated. The core features will be integrated into the next release. FireEye has several solutions for EDR and sandboxing."

"There are certain shortcomings in the features concerning DLP in Trellix, where certain additions must be made in the future."

"The solution needs to improve its virtual patching capabilities. One area where it could improve is by offering a patch management solution bundled with its security products. This would make it even more competitive against solutions like Kaspersky that offer this feature."

"There are more secure featured solutions from McAfee on the market but for smaller companies like ours, they are too expensive."

"With McAfee, if there is a zero-day vulnerability, you have to download the patch for it from the McAfee website, then apply it to your endpoint."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

"Their management interface is a little buggy. It requires a few system resources on the management interface. Its reporting can also be better. Overall, the reports are pretty good. They patch some third-party software, but if they can expand what they do for reporting and patch enterprise software, it would be handy."

"We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is paid yearly."

"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a reasonable price."

"The initial price is very good as they give good initial discounts, but it seems a little expensive once you renew the license."

"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."

"The product is expensive."

"The license costs are very reasonable, around 1,000 to 1,200 rupees per year."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

"Its price point has been phenomenal. Our previous solution from Trend Micro was triple the cost of it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

863,776 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

Wholesaler/Distributor

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?

It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 15% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Huntress Managed EDR vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 28% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 22% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 12% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 11% of the time

Malwarebytes vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 10% of the time

More VIPRE Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

July 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

July 2025

Download VIPRE Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

VIPRE Cloud, VIPRE Endpoint Security Cloud Edition, VIPRE Endpoint Security Server Edition

Overview

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

VIPRE Endpoint Security provides fast, powerful and easy-to-manage endpoint protection for businesses of all sizes, with a small footprint that won't slow you down.

VIPRE Security

Sample Customers

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

College Station ISD, Mid-West Companies, Guardian Network Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

July 2025

Free Report: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

863,776 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.