Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs VIPRE Endpoint Security comparison

Trellix and VIPRE Security are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Trellix is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while VIPRE Security is ranked #58. Trellix holds a 3.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to VIPRE Security’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of VIPRE Security users who would recommend it.

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Read 159 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews

9,310 Views
6,424 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Read 2 VIPRE Endpoint Security reviews

755 Views
619 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and VIPRE Endpoint Security compete in the endpoint security market. Trellix may have the upper hand in features and support, whereas VIPRE is preferred for its pricing and overall value.

Features: Trellix Endpoint Security provides advanced threat detection, automated response, and integration capabilities, making it ideal for complex environments. VIPRE focuses on strong malware protection, ease of use, and efficient threat management, making it suitable for small to medium businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix offers cloud-based deployment with extensive setup assistance for seamless integration. VIPRE’s straightforward deployment includes on-premises options and responsive customer support, appealing to smaller organizations.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix involves higher setup costs with significant ROI for larger enterprises through reduced security breaches. VIPRE is more cost-effective, with lower initial expenses and appealing returns for small businesses seeking basic security solutions. VIPRE's pricing enhances accessibility, while Trellix provides long-term value in complex environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

7th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

159

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (10th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (9th)

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

58th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.7%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VIPRE Endpoint Security is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform	3.7%
VIPRE Endpoint Security	0.5%
Other	95.8%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Abhimanyu Das

Senior Associate at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Threat detection is effective, and the solution provides good control over device access, but it still needs better troubleshooting options for agent-related issues.

From an improvement perspective, I am looking for a way to troubleshoot situations where the endpoint agent becomes corrupted and requires reinstallation, as there is currently no option to resolve these issues without rebooting the system. I give it a rating of seven because, in today’s scenario, the portal is complicated to navigate. The Trellix Endpoint Security Platform dashboard is somewhat difficult to understand, and it takes considerable time to familiarize oneself with the tools and policies compared to other solutions. For on-premises deployment, I would also like to highlight that the architecture is quite complex, which is an area Trellix Endpoint Security Platform should consider improving.

Read full review

Shawn S

IT Security Analyst at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees

Easy to upgrade and manage but needs better reporting

There just was a lot about it that I didn't like. For blocking certain items, such as USBs, we felt like it was slowing down the network too much. Therefore we utilized a GPO for blocking things like that instead. Our environment was big and I didn't feel like the console did a good enough job. We outgrew the product. I've been asking for a change for a couple of years now, and it finally got approved. In terms of the console, I had over 2000 endpoints in there and there wasn't even a search feature for me to look through them. If I had to find where a policy was I had to sort in alphabetical order to find an endpoint that I wanted. They need to offer a search function within the console - maybe something that shows a "last connected" notice. That way, it's easier to manage obsolete machines that you don't need anymore. They had a very vague setting, like after so many days, when do you want us to remove these, you'd see them. I just wish the console was a little more responsive when I would do commands. The reports could have been better. The product would show a lot of endpoints as not communicating. That was another pain point. We constantly had to run an SQL query to clean up the database as I would know immediately when I was in the console, that it just wasn't being responsive. I could tell I was being given bad data and that we had to clean up the database. As soon as I would clean up that database, it was like a purging of the SQL database and it would become a lot more responsive. The problem was that our environment was too big. We're going through a growth spurt right now. In the end, the solution is small and much better suited for a small business. We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for. The product is based on an older model of signature files. It doesn't use any artificial intelligence or anything. It was slow to refresh the policies and computer scans. The larger we got, the more it became an issue. If a company stayed small, I'm not sure if they would have noticed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform's most valuable features are AI capabilities and its quick updates."

"The most valuable features are the adaptive tech on McAfee."

"It provides a lot of information and great visibility, with really great options for managing the environment."

"It is easy to use, flexible, and stable. Because it is a cloud-based solution and it integrates all endpoints of the cloud, we can do an IOC-based search. It can search the entire enterprise and tell us the endpoints that are possibly compromised."

"There is a new feature where you can set thresholds for all the CPU consumption allowing for no consumption on the servers when the scans happen. It is a separate plugin or addon, and if we have it on all the virtual machines it automatically checks the resources, and based on that, it will schedule the scans. That is something that I have not seen in other antivirus solutions, such as Symantec."

"The seamless deployment is very valuable."

"The initial setup of Trellix Endpoint Security was straightforward."

"If the network has seen something, we can use that to put a block to all the endpoints."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

"In general, it was pretty easy to manage."

"It has low overhead as far as machine resources are concerned. Everything runs faster with VIPRE installed versus some of the competitors. It has also been pretty easy to use. It just runs and gives us reports. It also sends us alerts when there is something that we need to look at. It does its job, and you just look at the reports. In other ways, you just forget that it is there."

Cons

"McAfee GW Security and McAfee Child Safety need some improvement as they are relatively new."

"Most of these types of solutions including others, such as Carbon Black and FortiEDR, all have the same features. However, Carbon Black is the leader when it comes to being robust and user-friendly and this solution should improve in those areas to stay more competitive."

"I would like this solution to do what Palo Alto traps does because I would only need to run this one product."

"The product could be flexible and offer better pricing."

"I would like to see more local integration for the applications that we use."

"The email protection isn't efficient enough, and I'd like to see DLP features in the next release."

"It would be a lot easier if I could add multiple user accounts within a single device."

"I would like to see simple processing and reporting online."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

"We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for."

"Their management interface is a little buggy. It requires a few system resources on the management interface. Its reporting can also be better. Overall, the reports are pretty good. They patch some third-party software, but if they can expand what they do for reporting and patch enterprise software, it would be handy."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the cost as four to five, considering it's normal compared to other products. I find it nominal and worth the money."

"I think Trellix is more on the higher side of the market, just on a general scale, but I also think it depends on what particular package you choose."

"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."

"McAfee's prices are flexible and can be quite competitive, although there are other solutions that are even more so."

"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."

"I am happy with the pricing."

"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."

"The price of McAfee is pretty similar to Symantec, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

"Its price point has been phenomenal. Our previous solution from Trend Micro was triple the cost of it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

10%

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	67
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	61

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?

It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Huntress Managed EDR vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 12% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 8% of the time

More VIPRE Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

December 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

December 2025

Download VIPRE Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

VIPRE Cloud, VIPRE Endpoint Security Cloud Edition, VIPRE Endpoint Security Server Edition

Overview

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

VIPRE Endpoint Security provides fast, powerful and easy-to-manage endpoint protection for businesses of all sizes, with a small footprint that won't slow you down.

VIPRE Security

Sample Customers

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

College Station ISD, Mid-West Companies, Guardian Network Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

December 2025

Free Report: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.