Stackify vs Wazuh comparison

Stackify and Wazuh are both solutions in the Log Management category. Stackify is ranked #58, while Wazuh is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.9. Stackify holds a 0.2% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Wazuh’s 12.2% mindshare. Additionally, 71% of Stackify users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Wazuh users who would recommend it.

Stackify

Read 6 Stackify reviews

936 Views
262 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Wazuh

Read 49 Wazuh reviews

41,754 Views
25,470 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Stackify

Wazuh

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 25, 2025

Stackify and Wazuh both compete in the realm of application and infrastructure management. Stackify holds the upper hand in application performance monitoring due to its intuitive design and customer support, while Wazuh excels in security monitoring with its robust security features.

Features: Stackify supports developers with tools for application performance monitoring, real-time alerts, and error tracking. This makes it perfect for development teams focusing on performance optimization. Wazuh offers an open-source security monitoring suite, threat intelligence, and compliance management. Stackify emphasizes insightful performance metrics, whereas Wazuh provides a full security management suite.

Room for Improvement: Stackify could enhance its focus on security features to match the scope of Wazuh's offerings. Expanding interoperability with other security platforms might also be beneficial. Wazuh could simplify its setup and configuration to be as straightforward as Stackify’s. Enhancing user documentation and streamlining onboarding might also improve user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Stackify offers a straightforward cloud-based deployment model and responsive support. This benefits teams looking for quick implementation and ongoing assistance. Wazuh, although requiring more configuration, offers flexibility and customization through a community-driven approach. Stackify provides easier deployment, while Wazuh offers deep customization for security.

Pricing and ROI: Stackify has a scalable pricing model aligning with its performance-improvement focus, offering significant ROI for application monitoring. Wazuh, being open-source, provides lower upfront costs but may require investment in expertise for configuration and management. Stackify is valuable for performance monitoring investments, and Wazuh is cost-effective for organizations having existing technical resources for setup.

To learn more, read our detailed Stackify vs. Wazuh Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Stackify vs. Wazuh

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Stackify

Ranking in Log Management

58th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (60th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (59th)

Wazuh

Ranking in Log Management

1st

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (2nd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Stackify is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wazuh is 12.2%, down from 15.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Wazuh	12.2%
Stackify	0.2%
Other	87.6%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Moses Arigbede

Head of DevOps at Partsimony

Easy to set up with great custom dashboards but needs to improve non-.NET infrastructure

They need to improve non-.NET infrastructure. We always had difficulty when it comes to reporting or metrics that come from Linux operating systems and Docker containers. For anything that runs within the Unix environment, we always had problems with them, however, if it was a document-based application, Stackify was 100%, it gave everything. Now, the aggregation agent, the metric agent for Stackify for Linux, collects everything. When I say everything, I mean, everything. It collects so much information that we now started to term it as useless data as all that ingestion will just come in and overwhelm your log retention limit for the month and really this spike up your cost at the end of the month. You'll need to do a lot in order to train down the data coming in from all your Linux environments, to get to what you really need, which actually takes some time as well. I would like to be able to see metrics about individual running containers on the host machines. Stackify has not really gotten that right, as far as I'm concerned. Netdata has done a better job and New Relic has also done a better job. They need to improve on that. We need to be able to see the individual resource usage of containers running within a particular host.

Read full review

Ebenezer Okoh

Security Consultant at ebenezer.okoh@agorasecurity.it

Innovative platform enables proactive threat hunting and endpoint monitoring

I have not seen Wazuh moving in the direction of AI-driven threat detection projects myself, but since the market is moving that way, I wouldn't be surprised if they implemented it soon. My plans to increase the usage of Wazuh or switch to another tool depend on what my boss decides. We don't refer to any community support specifically, as we rely on other platforms such as GitHub or Discord, depending on the application. I recommend that as more companies come on board with Wazuh, it will motivate those who contribute to it, but I am also cautious that as it gains attention, a large company might buy it and change its course of business. Overall, I rate Wazuh a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The deployment is very fast."

"The filter feature on Stackify is one of the features I found valuable. It's awesome. When I want to get the application logs, the solution gives me many filters. For example, if I want to get logs from my test environment, the option is there for me to select the environment from Stackify, and you can also select the particular application, and you'll see the information you need there. The filter feature alone and the fact that Stackify offers a lot of different filters is what I like the most about the solution because I've used other tools with the filter feature, but the filtering was very difficult, versus Stackify that has good filtering. On Stackify, you can filter the information by the last one hour, or the last four hours, and you can also select the date range and specify the timestamp, then the solution will give you the information based on the date range you specified. Another feature I found valuable on Stackify is its rating feature because it tells you how your application is faring. For example, a rating of A means excellent, while a rating of F means very bad, or that your application is not doing well at all. The ratings are from A to F. I also like that Stackify helps you in terms of load management because the solution gives you information on overutilized resources. These are the most valuable features of the solution."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"The performance dashboard and the accurate level of details are beneficial."

"We found the MITRE framework mapping and the agent enrollment service to be the most valuable features of Wazuh."

"Integrates with various open-source and paid products, allowing for flexibility in customization based on use cases."

"It's stable."

"Overall, I rate Wazuh a nine out of ten."

"The log monitoring and analysis tools are great in addition to SIEM file activity monitoring."

"It is excellent in terms of visualization and indexing services, making it a powerful tool for malware detection."

"My company implemented Wazuh because it was relatively inexpensive. They could quickly get their hands on it to check a box for some audit and compliance."

"I find the PCI DSS feature the most valuable, along with the feature that monitors the compliance of Windows and the CIS benchmarks on other devices like Unix or Linux systems."

More Wazuh pros

Cons

"It should be easily scalable and configurable in different instances."

"I've not used Stackify for a while, and I'm currently using a solution now that's not as good as Stackify. Among the solutions I've been using so far, Stackify has been one of the best for me, but there's always room for improvement. For example, I don't know if it's just me, but when I try to get the log from Stackify, sometimes it doesn't appear in real-time. It takes a few minutes before the logs appear. When I redeploy my solution and the application starts, I don't see the logs immediately, and it would take two to three minutes before I see the logs. I don't know if other customers have a similar experience. It's the wait time for the logs to appear that's a concern for me, could be improved, and is what the Stackify team should be looking into. In terms of any additional feature that I'd like added to the solution, I'm not sure if Stackify has a way to export logs out. I've been trying to do it. On the solution, you can click on a spiral-like icon and it shows you the entire error, and I'd prefer an export button that would let me download the error and save that into a text file, for example, so it'll be available on my local machine for me to reference it, especially because the log keeps going and as you're using the solution, the system keeps pushing messages on to Stackify, so if I'm looking at a particular error at 12:05 PM, for example, by the time I go back to my system and would like to revisit the error at 12:25 PM, on Stackify, the logs would have gone past that level and I won't see it again which makes it difficult. When you now go back to that timestamp, you don't tend to see it immediately, but if the solution had an export feature for me to save that particular error information on my local machine for reference at a later time, I won't have to go back to Stackify. I just go to that log, specifically to that particular export that I've received on my local machine. I can get it and review it, and it would be easier that way versus me going back to Stackify to find that particular error and request that particular information."

"The search feature could be improved."

"I would like to be able to see metrics about individual running containers on the host machines."

"The support team could be more responsive and provide quicker replies during our working hours in Indonesia, which would be a significant improvement."

"Wazuh is missing many things that a typical SIEM should have."

"Wazuh doesn't cover sources of events as well as Splunk. You can integrate Splunk with many sources of events, but it's a painful process to take care of some sources of events with Wazuh."

"The biggest part that's missing is threat intelligence. It isn't inbuilt, and if a sudden incident occurs, we don't get that feedback inside the SIEM tool. That's a big gap, I see. It would be better if we could get the threat intelligence feeds integrated with the SIEM tools. That would help us push value solutions to the clients in a big way."

"Integration with Vyara could be better."

"Some features, like alerting, are complex with Wazuh."

"They need to go towards integrating with more cloud applications and not just OS like Windows and Linux."

"A more structured approach, perhaps with modular UI components, to facilitate easier integration and navigation within the Wazuh platform for custom integrations would be beneficial."

More Wazuh cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is variable. It depends on how much data we have received in that particular month. Usually, it goes up to $2,000, or, at times, $3,000 USD per month."

"Wazuh is an open-source tool, which means it is freely available for use."

"Wazuh is open-source, so I think it's an option for a small organization that cannot go for enterprise-grade solutions like Splunk."

"Wazuh is totally free and open source. There are no licensing costs, only support costs if you need them."

"Wazuh is not an expensive solution."

"We use the free version of Wazuh."

"It is an open-source product."

"Wazuh is free and open source."

"Wazuh is an open-source tool."

More Wazuh pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Media Company

Comms Service Provider

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Wazuh?

Wazuh is its flexibility and open-source nature, which allows us to tailor threat detection and response across diverse client environments. Its integration capabilities with SOAR, cloud platforms,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Wazuh?

The lack of AI features is an issue at the moment in the industry. Forti provides user behavior capabilities, which I would want to see in Wazuh. In FortiSIEM, they provide user behavior understand...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Wazuh?

At the moment, I'm working in software integration, so we are working with FortiGate. To research and get an idea, I did some investigation into Wazuh. They have already used Fortinet products. The...

See all answers

Comparisons

New Relic vs Stackify

Compared 46% of the time

Dynatrace vs Stackify

Compared 23% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Stackify

Compared 18% of the time

Datadog vs Stackify

Compared 14% of the time

More Stackify Competitors

Security Onion vs Wazuh

Compared 13% of the time

Elastic Stack vs Wazuh

Compared 12% of the time

Graylog Enterprise vs Wazuh

Compared 7% of the time

AlienVault OSSIM vs Wazuh

Compared 6% of the time

Elastic Security vs Wazuh

Compared 5% of the time

More Wazuh Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Stackify

September 2025

Download Stackify product report

Buyer's Guide

Wazuh

September 2025

Download Wazuh product report

Also Known As

No data available

Wazuh All-In-One Deployment

Overview

Stackify is an application performance management (APM) solution that combines application performance monitoring with logs, errors, and reporting. It is a SaaS solution that is developer-focused. Users can quickly scan, identify, and repair issues with applications. Stackify APM offers valuable tools, such as Prefix and Retrace, which help to make it a comprehensive and valuable APM solution. Stackify is now part of the Netreo family of IT Infrastructure Management (ITIM), which is considered one of the fastest-growing IT organizations in the marketplace today.

Stackify Prefix

Stackify Prefix helps developers write better code, faster. The tool examines, tests, and approves code as it is being written. Almost every new application is code-perfect, negating the need for exhausting troubleshooting and frustrating time-consuming code review.

Prefix is able to discover poor-performing SQL queries, ORM queries, potential bottlenecks, and concealed exceptions prior to moving the application into production.

Prefix offers Summary Dashboards, intuitive suggestions, integrated logs, and distributed tracing. Distributed tracing expands visibility to cloud-native applications, microservices, and containers and can also provide additional transparency to cache services, web services, third-party services, and more. Users are able to easily move from logs to traces and back.

This valuable tool ensures developers are able to consistently release the best code possible in the least amount of time, while improving performance, productivity, and profitability.

Prefix is a very robust and easy-to-use tool. It can be used seamlessly with Linux, macOS, and Windows. Prefix integrates well with numerous languages, such as Java, Python, Ruby, PHP, Node.js, .Net, and .Net Core.

Stackify Retrace

Stackify Retrace is a user-friendly, trusted APM solution used in more than fifty countries worldwide. Users know that Retrace is able to ensure they can complete quicker, more efficient application development and consistently enhance overall application performance by suggesting important intuitive suggestions users need.

This solution is beneficial to both developers (Dev) and operations (Ops) personnel to learn to improve code and immediately finetune issues by:

Establishing effortless collaboration between Dev and Ops personnel via an easy-to-use GUI dashboard.
Delivering complete transparency of all stages of the application development process, from pre-development to production.
Utilizing performance protocols, such as error tracking, application logs, and code profiling, in real time in order to thoroughly understand how long a code will take to complete various tasks.
Improving overall efficiency and productivity by immediately discovering and repairing application issues.

Retrace Real User Monitoring (RUM) uses both front-end and back-end monitoring to give users a complete picture of what is going on with the applications. This intuitive dashboard displays performance with a complete breakdown of resource usage and integrates the server-side and client traces into one engaging, user-friendly, extensive view.

Retrace is an out-of-the-box solution that works seamlessly with Java stacks, PHP, Node.js, Ruby, Python, .Net, and .Net Core. It is also compatible with many of today’s popular frameworks, such as AWS, Azure, Elasticsearch, MongoDB, MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL, Redis, and SQL Server. Additionally, Retrace will work effectively with many cloud providers, containers, and languages, and offers excellent and easy integration with today's favorite tools such as Jira, Slack, Jenkins, and more.

Stackify

Wazuh offers comprehensive security features like MITRE ATT&CK correlation, log monitoring, and cloud-native infrastructure. It ensures compliance and provides intrusion detection with high scalability and open-source flexibility, ideal for businesses seeking robust SIEM capabilities.

Wazuh stands out in security information and event management by providing efficient log aggregation, vulnerability scanning, and event correlation against MITRE ATT&CK. Its capability to integrate seamlessly with environments, manage compliance, and monitor files makes it suitable for cloud-native infrastructures and financial sectors. Despite its technical support needing enhancement and opportunities for improving AI integration and threat intelligence, its open-source nature and cost-effectiveness make it appealing. Users can leverage custom dashboards powered by Elasticsearch for precise data analysis, even though there is a desire for a more user-friendly interface and better enterprise solution integration. Deployment may be complex, but its features contribute significantly to fortified security postures.

What are the essential features of Wazuh?

MITRE ATT&CK Correlation: Aligns events with recognized adversary tactics and techniques.
Log Monitoring: Collects and analyzes logs for threat detection.
Cloud-Native Infrastructure: Supports modern cloud environments.
Vulnerability Scanning: Identifies potential security weaknesses.
File Integrity Monitoring: Ensures the integrity of sensitive files.
Open-Source Flexibility: Customizable and adaptable code base.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-Effectiveness: Offers a budget-friendly security solution.
Ease of Use: Simplified setup and management.
Comprehensive Compliance Management: Aids in meeting regulatory requirements.
High Scalability: Grows with businesses and adapts to different environments.
Extensive Third-Party Integrations: Connects to various existing systems.

Industries like finance and cloud infrastructure heavily utilize Wazuh for its security strengths. By monitoring endpoints and ensuring compliance with frameworks, companies can improve security posture and swiftly detect anomalies. The platform's focus on event correlation and alerts for security incidents is particularly beneficial.

Wazuh

Sample Customers

MyRacePass, ClearSale, Newitts, Carbonite, Boston Software, Children's International, Starkwood Media Group, Fewzion

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Stackify vs. Wazuh

September 2025

Free Report: Stackify vs. Wazuh

Find out what your peers are saying about Stackify vs. Wazuh and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Stackify vs. Wazuh report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.