Stackify vs Wazuh comparison

Stackify and Wazuh are both solutions in the Log Management category. Stackify is ranked #58, while Wazuh is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8. Stackify holds a 0.7% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Wazuh’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 71% of Stackify users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Wazuh users who would recommend it.

Stackify

Read 6 Stackify reviews

2,142 Views
793 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Wazuh

Read 50 Wazuh reviews

33,805 Views
19,269 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Stackify

Wazuh

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Stackify and Wazuh are competing in the application performance monitoring and security analytics space. Stackify is preferred for its intuitive interface and customer support, whereas Wazuh is favored for its robust features and open-source model, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive security tools.

Features: Stackify provides application performance monitoring, error tracking, and real-time logs, designed for developers to enhance workflow. It allows custom dashboards and integrations, streamlining the user experience. Wazuh offers extensive security features like threat detection, compliance management, and incident response, ideal for enterprises requiring intensive security measures. Its open-source nature allows users to modify features based on their needs.

Room for Improvement: Stackify could enhance its security features and expand its integration capabilities. Additional customization options for its monitoring tools would also improve its flexibility. Wazuh can work on streamlining its deployment process and improve its user interface for easier navigation. Enhanced customer support would benefit users seeking quick resolutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Stackify offers an effortless deployment with solid integration and reliable customer support, enabling rapid utilization by developers. Wazuh, being open-source, requires more effort in deployment and configuration. However, it benefits from a supportive community, which aids in maintenance and troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: Stackify operates on a subscription pricing model, striking a balance between cost and functionality, which can lead to significant improvements in development efficiency and ROI. Wazuh, as a free open-source solution, minimizes up-front costs, appealing to cost-conscious organizations. While hidden costs in setup and management might impact its ROI, its no-cost aspect supports broad security adoption.

To learn more, read our detailed Stackify vs. Wazuh Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Stackify vs. Wazuh

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,858 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Stackify

Ranking in Log Management

58th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (64th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (65th)

Wazuh

Ranking in Log Management

1st

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (2nd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Stackify is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wazuh is 6.1%, down from 15.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Wazuh	6.1%
Stackify	0.7%
Other	93.2%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Idoko Emmanuel

Senior Software Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has good filtering and rating features and helps with resource and load management

I've not used Stackify for a while, and I'm currently using a solution now that's not as good as Stackify. Among the solutions I've been using so far, Stackify has been one of the best for me, but there's always room for improvement. For example, I don't know if it's just me, but when I try to get the log from Stackify, sometimes it doesn't appear in real-time. It takes a few minutes before the logs appear. When I redeploy my solution and the application starts, I don't see the logs immediately, and it would take two to three minutes before I see the logs. I don't know if other customers have a similar experience. It's the wait time for the logs to appear that's a concern for me, could be improved, and is what the Stackify team should be looking into. In terms of any additional feature that I'd like added to the solution, I'm not sure if Stackify has a way to export logs out. I've been trying to do it. On the solution, you can click on a spiral-like icon and it shows you the entire error, and I'd prefer an export button that would let me download the error and save that into a text file, for example, so it'll be available on my local machine for me to reference it, especially because the log keeps going and as you're using the solution, the system keeps pushing messages on to Stackify, so if I'm looking at a particular error at 12:05 PM, for example, by the time I go back to my system and would like to revisit the error at 12:25 PM, on Stackify, the logs would have gone past that level and I won't see it again which makes it difficult. When you now go back to that timestamp, you don't tend to see it immediately, but if the solution had an export feature for me to save that particular error information on my local machine for reference at a later time, I won't have to go back to Stackify. I just go to that log, specifically to that particular export that I've received on my local machine. I can get it and review it, and it would be easier that way versus me going back to Stackify to find that particular error and request that particular information.

Read full review

Rajin Sandira

Engineer Information Security at N-Able (Pvt) Ltd

Has faced limitations in AI capabilities and pricing flexibility

Pricing-wise, Wazuh stands out, along with deployment flexibility and its documentation which is extremely good in comparison to Forti. The community support is also incredible. They have helped quite a bit because previously, we had a separate tool and management dashboard to do our compliance. With Wazuh, we receive that information without having to do anything extra. We just set up the SIEM and all of that information was automatically populated. The dashboards are very easy to understand and very quick with no lag or delay. I have experienced delays on Forti's dashboards, but not with Wazuh. Wazuh is quite good. In comparison to Forti, they are quite similar. They are very good at detection.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The performance dashboard and the accurate level of details are beneficial."

"We switched from New Relic and Loggly as it provides us more info at a lower price."

"What stood out to us were the metrics and granular details we received."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"My advice to anyone who wants to use Stackify is to go for it because my experience with it is good."

"The deployment is very fast."

"The filter feature on Stackify is one of the features I found valuable. It's awesome. When I want to get the application logs, the solution gives me many filters. For example, if I want to get logs from my test environment, the option is there for me to select the environment from Stackify, and you can also select the particular application, and you'll see the information you need there. The filter feature alone and the fact that Stackify offers a lot of different filters is what I like the most about the solution because I've used other tools with the filter feature, but the filtering was very difficult, versus Stackify that has good filtering. On Stackify, you can filter the information by the last one hour, or the last four hours, and you can also select the date range and specify the timestamp, then the solution will give you the information based on the date range you specified. Another feature I found valuable on Stackify is its rating feature because it tells you how your application is faring. For example, a rating of A means excellent, while a rating of F means very bad, or that your application is not doing well at all. The ratings are from A to F. I also like that Stackify helps you in terms of load management because the solution gives you information on overutilized resources. These are the most valuable features of the solution."

"It is very simple and very easy to configure."

More Stackify pros

"Wazuh's most valuable features include file monitoring and compliance reporting, which do not require excessive costs."

"I find the PCI DSS feature the most valuable, along with the feature that monitors the compliance of Windows and the CIS benchmarks on other devices like Unix or Linux systems."

"The solution is easy to maintain."

"I like Wazuh because it is a lot like ELK, which I was already comfortable with, so I didn't have to learn from scratch."

"Wazuh has very flexible and robust features."

"I find the PCI DSS feature the most valuable, along with the feature that monitors the compliance of Windows and the CIS benchmarks on other devices like Unix or Linux systems."

"Wazuh's most valuable features include file monitoring and compliance reporting, which do not require excessive costs."

"Wazuh automatically scans the host for CIS benchmarks for the latest updates and vulnerabilities and gives a host score. It provides a percentage of perceived risk due to of non patches or any missing patches on that work."

More Wazuh pros

Cons

"I'm looking to see more performance tools, but heard that they are going to release some."

"I would like to be able to see metrics about individual running containers on the host machines."

"Better mobile support."

"When I redeploy my solution and the application starts, I don't see the logs immediately, and it would take two to three minutes before I see the logs."

"It should be easily scalable and configurable in different instances."

"The search feature could be improved."

"I've not used Stackify for a while, and I'm currently using a solution now that's not as good as Stackify. Among the solutions I've been using so far, Stackify has been one of the best for me, but there's always room for improvement. For example, I don't know if it's just me, but when I try to get the log from Stackify, sometimes it doesn't appear in real-time. It takes a few minutes before the logs appear. When I redeploy my solution and the application starts, I don't see the logs immediately, and it would take two to three minutes before I see the logs. I don't know if other customers have a similar experience. It's the wait time for the logs to appear that's a concern for me, could be improved, and is what the Stackify team should be looking into. In terms of any additional feature that I'd like added to the solution, I'm not sure if Stackify has a way to export logs out. I've been trying to do it. On the solution, you can click on a spiral-like icon and it shows you the entire error, and I'd prefer an export button that would let me download the error and save that into a text file, for example, so it'll be available on my local machine for me to reference it, especially because the log keeps going and as you're using the solution, the system keeps pushing messages on to Stackify, so if I'm looking at a particular error at 12:05 PM, for example, by the time I go back to my system and would like to revisit the error at 12:25 PM, on Stackify, the logs would have gone past that level and I won't see it again which makes it difficult. When you now go back to that timestamp, you don't tend to see it immediately, but if the solution had an export feature for me to save that particular error information on my local machine for reference at a later time, I won't have to go back to Stackify. I just go to that log, specifically to that particular export that I've received on my local machine. I can get it and review it, and it would be easier that way versus me going back to Stackify to find that particular error and request that particular information."

"One thing that happens as a new user on Stackify is when you install the agent it pulls everything and if you're not careful, your log allowance will just be exhausted as you are actually pulling too much data."

More Stackify cons

"Scalability is a constraint in the on-prem version of Wazuh in terms of the volume of logs we can manage."

"There is room for improvement by integrating more AI into Wazuh. It requires constant nurturing, as I have to provide it with code and specific requirements."

"Its user interface for sure can be improved. It is not so comfortable to use if you're looking for specific logs."

"Adding the flexibility to integrate various plug-ins or modules into its core system would enhance functionality."

"There's not much I like about Wazuh. Other products I've used were a lot more functional and user friendly. They came with reports and use cases out of the box. We need to configure Wazuh's alerts and monitoring capabilities manually. It'd be nice if we could select from templates and presets for use cases already built and coded."

"They need to go towards integrating with more cloud applications and not just OS like Windows and Linux."

"However, in the long term, if you want to build a SOC center on Wazuh, I do not recommend it because it's not stable."

"Wazuh has a drawback with regard to Unix systems. The solution does not allow us to do real-time monitoring for Unix systems. If usage increases, it would be a heavy fall on the other SIEM solutions or event monitoring solutions."

More Wazuh cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is variable. It depends on how much data we have received in that particular month. Usually, it goes up to $2,000, or, at times, $3,000 USD per month."

"Wazuh has a community edition, and I was using that. It's free and open source."

"It is a free-of-cost solution."

"The solution's pricing is very competitive."

"Wazuh is totally free and open source. There are no licensing costs, only support costs if you need them."

"We use the free version of Wazuh."

"Wazuh is a good tool, but the open-source version has scalability limitations."

"The solution's cost is above the average."

"Wazuh is open-source, but you must consider the total cost of ownership. It may be free to acquire, but you spend a lot of time and effort supporting the product and getting it to a point where it's useful."

More Wazuh pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Media Company

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Wazuh?

Wazuh is its flexibility and open-source nature, which allows us to tailor threat detection and response across diverse client environments. Its integration capabilities with SOAR, cloud platforms,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Wazuh?

Regarding compliance, I find it not stable. I do not recommend it for that purpose. It can comply with Wazuh NCA, which we have here in Saudi Arabia. Wazuh NCA has many frameworks starting with ECC...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Wazuh?

I have been working with Wazuh for two years, and I can explain how I use Wazuh. I did not use Wazuh as a SIEM solution. I use Wazuh as a tool for services we provide. This service is called compro...

See all answers

Comparisons

New Relic vs Stackify

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Stackify

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Stackify

Compared 5% of the time

DX Spectrum vs Stackify

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs Stackify

Compared 5% of the time

More Stackify Competitors

Security Onion vs Wazuh

Compared 7% of the time

Elastic Stack vs Wazuh

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Wazuh

Compared 4% of the time

Elastic Security vs Wazuh

Compared 4% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Wazuh

Compared 4% of the time

More Wazuh Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Stackify

March 2026

Download Stackify product report

Buyer's Guide

Wazuh

March 2026

Download Wazuh product report

Also Known As

No data available

Wazuh All-In-One Deployment

Overview

Stackify is an application performance management (APM) solution that combines application performance monitoring with logs, errors, and reporting. It is a SaaS solution that is developer-focused. Users can quickly scan, identify, and repair issues with applications. Stackify APM offers valuable tools, such as Prefix and Retrace, which help to make it a comprehensive and valuable APM solution. Stackify is now part of the Netreo family of IT Infrastructure Management (ITIM), which is considered one of the fastest-growing IT organizations in the marketplace today.

Stackify Prefix

Stackify Prefix helps developers write better code, faster. The tool examines, tests, and approves code as it is being written. Almost every new application is code-perfect, negating the need for exhausting troubleshooting and frustrating time-consuming code review.

Prefix is able to discover poor-performing SQL queries, ORM queries, potential bottlenecks, and concealed exceptions prior to moving the application into production.

Prefix offers Summary Dashboards, intuitive suggestions, integrated logs, and distributed tracing. Distributed tracing expands visibility to cloud-native applications, microservices, and containers and can also provide additional transparency to cache services, web services, third-party services, and more. Users are able to easily move from logs to traces and back.

This valuable tool ensures developers are able to consistently release the best code possible in the least amount of time, while improving performance, productivity, and profitability.

Prefix is a very robust and easy-to-use tool. It can be used seamlessly with Linux, macOS, and Windows. Prefix integrates well with numerous languages, such as Java, Python, Ruby, PHP, Node.js, .Net, and .Net Core.

Stackify Retrace

Stackify Retrace is a user-friendly, trusted APM solution used in more than fifty countries worldwide. Users know that Retrace is able to ensure they can complete quicker, more efficient application development and consistently enhance overall application performance by suggesting important intuitive suggestions users need.

This solution is beneficial to both developers (Dev) and operations (Ops) personnel to learn to improve code and immediately finetune issues by:

Establishing effortless collaboration between Dev and Ops personnel via an easy-to-use GUI dashboard.
Delivering complete transparency of all stages of the application development process, from pre-development to production.
Utilizing performance protocols, such as error tracking, application logs, and code profiling, in real time in order to thoroughly understand how long a code will take to complete various tasks.
Improving overall efficiency and productivity by immediately discovering and repairing application issues.

Retrace Real User Monitoring (RUM) uses both front-end and back-end monitoring to give users a complete picture of what is going on with the applications. This intuitive dashboard displays performance with a complete breakdown of resource usage and integrates the server-side and client traces into one engaging, user-friendly, extensive view.

Retrace is an out-of-the-box solution that works seamlessly with Java stacks, PHP, Node.js, Ruby, Python, .Net, and .Net Core. It is also compatible with many of today’s popular frameworks, such as AWS, Azure, Elasticsearch, MongoDB, MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL, Redis, and SQL Server. Additionally, Retrace will work effectively with many cloud providers, containers, and languages, and offers excellent and easy integration with today's favorite tools such as Jira, Slack, Jenkins, and more.

Stackify

Wazuh offers an open-source platform designed for seamless integration into diverse environments, making it ideal for enhancing security infrastructure. Its features include log monitoring, compliance support, and real-time threat detection, providing effective cybersecurity management.

Wazuh stands out for its ability to integrate easily with Kubernetes, cloud-native infrastructures, and various SIEM platforms like ELK. It features robust MITRE ATT&CK correlation, comprehensive log monitoring capabilities, and detailed reporting dashboards. Users benefit from its file integrity monitoring and endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities, which streamline compliance and vulnerability assessments. While appreciated for its customization and easy deployment, room for improvement exists in scalability, particularly in the free version, and in areas such as threat intelligence integration, cloud integration, and container security. The platform is acknowledged for its strong documentation and technical support.

What are the key features of Wazuh?

MITRE ATT&CK Correlation: Streamlines threat analysis by correlating security data with known attack patterns.
Log Monitoring: Provides continuous oversight of log data to enhance security insights.
SIEM and ELK Integration: Simplifies centralization of security events and analytics.
Kubernetes Support: Ensures security measures align with containerized environments.
File Integrity Monitoring: Alerts on unauthorized changes to critical files.
Endpoint Detection and Response: Identifies and mitigates endpoint threats efficiently.
Compliance and Benchmarking: Built-in rules assist in meeting regulatory standards.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Cost-Effectiveness: Offers an affordable open-source security solution tailored for extensive customization.
Customization: Users can adjust features to fit unique security requirements.
Scalability: Facilitates growth by adapting to expanding security needs.
Comprehensive Support: Backed by detailed documentation and technical expertise.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps maintain adherence to industry-specific regulations.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Wazuh is utilized for its capabilities in log aggregation, threat detection, and vulnerability management. Companies often implement its features to ensure compliance with stringent regulations and to enhance security practices across cloud environments. By leveraging its integration capabilities, organizations can achieve unified security management, ensuring comprehensive protection of their digital assets.

Wazuh

Sample Customers

MyRacePass, ClearSale, Newitts, Carbonite, Boston Software, Children's International, Starkwood Media Group, Fewzion

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Stackify vs. Wazuh

April 2026

Free Report: Stackify vs. Wazuh

Find out what your peers are saying about Stackify vs. Wazuh and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Stackify vs. Wazuh report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.