Splunk Observability Cloud vs TruView comparison

Splunk and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Splunk is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.7, while NETSCOUT is ranked #72 with an average rating of 5.0. Splunk holds a 0.9% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Splunk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 57 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

5,348 Views
1,390 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

TruView

Read 17 TruView reviews

437 Views
393 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Splunk Observability Cloud

TruView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

TruView and Splunk Observability Cloud compete in the observability space. While TruView offers economic value with low costs and strong customer support, Splunk Observability Cloud stands out for its comprehensive features and analytical capabilities, offering significant value for larger enterprises despite a higher cost.

Features: TruView provides real-time insights, intuitive monitoring tools, and is ideal for smaller scale operations. Splunk Observability Cloud is recognized for advanced analytics, extensive integration capacities, and scalable infrastructure, making it suited for enterprises handling extensive data.

Room for Improvement: TruView could enhance its real-time monitoring capabilities, integrate more advanced performance features, and offer broader data integration options. Splunk Observability Cloud could simplify its deployment process, improve cost transparency, and offer more user-friendly interfaces for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TruView is known for simple deployment and responsive customer service, making it appealing for quick operational readiness. Splunk Observability Cloud, with a more complex setup due to its broad features, provides substantial documentation and support for large organizations focused on features.

Pricing and ROI: TruView offers a low-cost setup with strong short-term ROI and straightforward pricing. Splunk Observability Cloud, while initially more expensive, delivers long-term ROI through its rich features and scalability, suitable for companies prioritizing detailed data analysis and growth potential.

To learn more, read our detailed Splunk Observability Cloud vs. TruView Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud vs. TruView

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,576 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (8th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (7th), Container Management (6th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (2nd)

TruView

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

72nd

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TruView is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Lakshmi Padaga

Java Developer at U.S. Bank

Collaborates performance metrics with log data to pinpoint the exact cause of issues and offers error detection

Splunk APM is a robust tool with many capabilities. There are always areas for potential improvement to enhance its functionality and user experience. For Splunk APM, there could be simplified navigation, like streamlining the user interface to make navigation more intuitive for our users, especially those new to APM, which can enhance usability. We can provide more customization options for dashboards and visualizations to help users tailor the platform to their specific needs. There could be more integration capabilities with a wider range of third-party tools and platforms would also be beneficial. By focusing on these areas, Splunk APM can enhance its value proposition, improve user satisfaction, and better meet the evolving needs of organizations monitoring their application performance.

Read full review

Zotex

Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Monitors traffic, analyzes flows, tracks packets, and measures bandwidth across our network

We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The company has many systems that the customer is paying to access. Splunk APM issued via AppDynamics helps find problems in the feed. It reduces the risk of supervising all the devices. I can supervise the flow and simulate the conditions of the repository across several dashboards to show what's happening at the moment."

"The product's deployment phase is good and very easy because it is done with OpenTelemetry for most of the parts."

"It supports proactive management, enhances security, and improves operational efficiency."

"Dashboards help the application support teams to have a quick look at how their systems are running. It helps other teams as well."

"It is a great resource for us because we have so many different data sources and to be able to aggregate that and put it through a concise dashboard or an alert really helps."

"I like the fact that Splunk APM makes it easy to connect to the application database and run queries against the data."

"It is a good tool. It allows you to set alerts for application and infrastructure monitoring, and it allows you to create dashboards."

"Splunk APM provides a holistic view of the application. Unlike other APMs, Splunk's service map is quite effective."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pros

"We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights."

"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."

Cons

"The UI enhancements could be a way to improve the solution in the future."

"They can improve the flow system and the keyword language. It has predefined keywords, but they can be improved."

"Splunk isn't an ideal tool for application performance management due to the extensive setup required."

"Technical support is good but could be improved, particularly concerning the time taken for ticket resolution."

"The solution's stability is an area that has room for improvement. It needs to provide constant stability to its users."

"Splunk APM should include a better correlation between resources and infrastructure monitoring."

"The implementation can be more user-friendly."

"Once you see the issues related to the scalability part, you need to understand that it is a warning triangle. After seeing the warning triangle, you need to realize that you cannot trust any of the numbers you see in the chart because it is not a complete, full data set."

More Splunk Observability Cloud cons

"We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service."

"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It appears to be expensive compared to competitors."

"Splunk's infrastructure monitoring costs can be high because our billing is based on data volume measured in terabytes, rather than the number of devices being monitored."

"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is an expensive solution."

"The product is a bit expensive considering the competition but the company may negotiate the price."

"The solution's pricing is competitive. I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten. The price of the solution could be cheaper."

"Splunk Observability Cloud is expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"This is an expensive solution."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SignalFx?

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with TruView?

We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TruView?

We use TruView to monitor traffic, analyze flows, track packets, and measure bandwidth across our network. This helps us gain insights into our network's performance, detect any anomalies or attack...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TruView?

Overall, I would rate TruView a nine out of ten. I would recommend it for mid-sized organizations, particularly those with fewer than two thousand people, as it offers flexible licensing without de...

See all answers

Comparisons

Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Cribl vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

SigNoz vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs TruView

Compared 100% of the time

More TruView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

July 2025

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

TruView

July 2025

Download TruView product report

Also Known As

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

No data available

Overview

Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.

What are the key features?

Log Searching: Efficiently search and analyze logs from various sources.
Data Integration: Seamlessly integrate with multiple environments.
Dashboard Customization: Tailor dashboards to specific monitoring needs.
Monitoring Capabilities: Provides comprehensive insights into application performance.
Security Features: Analyze and address security threats across systems.
Visualization Tools: Enhance data analysis and system performance optimization.

Why consider this for ROI?

Comprehensive Visibility: Gain complete insights into IT infrastructure.
Performance Optimization: Improve overall system performance and efficiency.
Rapid Deployment: Quick setup to meet organization demands swiftly.
Enhanced Security: Strengthen security measures through detailed analytics.

In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.

Splunk

Visual TruView by Fluke Networks is a unified solution for Application Aware Network Performance Management (AANPM). TruView embeds the most important data sources such as packet, transaction, NetFlow/IPFIX, and SNMP to present analytics in a time-correlated single dashboard view. These correlated views help you quickly see how well the infrastructure is transporting applications and how well those applications are performing in the context of end-user experience. And, TruView’s integrated 10 Gbps full line rate stream-to-disk packet capture ensures you’ll never miss an important event again.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

FloraHolland, Miami-Dade Public Library System, Southeastern Freight Lines, Valdosta State University, Everett Clinic, Bioreference, Key Information Systems, ACER, Odeabank A.S.

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud vs. TruView

July 2025

Free Report: Splunk Observability Cloud vs. TruView

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk Observability Cloud vs. TruView and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Splunk Observability Cloud vs. TruView report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.