Splunk Observability Cloud vs Stackify comparison

Splunk and Stackify are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Splunk is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.7, while Stackify is ranked #60. Splunk holds a 1.7% mindshare in APM, compared to Stackify’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Splunk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Stackify users who would recommend it.

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 56 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

2,960 Views
1,374 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Stackify

Read 6 Stackify reviews

480 Views
276 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Splunk Observability Cloud

Stackify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Stackify and Splunk Observability Cloud compete in the observability solutions category, particularly excelling in monitoring applications and infrastructure. Stackify has an edge in catering to small to mid-sized organizations with its ease of deployment and user-friendly features, while Splunk Observability Cloud is preferred for larger enterprises due to its extensive data analytics and scalability.

Features: Stackify supports application performance monitoring, error tracking, and log management, with an emphasis on ease of use. This makes it highly suitable for small to mid-sized businesses. Splunk Observability Cloud offers extensive data processing capabilities, advanced real-time metrics, trace analytics, and comprehensive log management features, making it ideal for more complex, larger environments.

Room for Improvement: Stackify could enhance its data processing capabilities and scalability to better serve larger enterprises. It should also include advanced real-time metrics and trace analytics to provide deeper insights. Splunk Observability Cloud could simplify its deployment process to be more accessible and user-friendly for smaller teams. It may also benefit from offering a more competitive pricing structure to attract mid-sized businesses. Additionally, enhancing out-of-the-box user-friendly features would be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Stackify offers a straightforward deployment process with comprehensive support, ideal for teams with limited resources, ensuring quick setup. Splunk Observability Cloud, while more complex to deploy, provides robust customer support and detailed documentation, better suited for enterprises willing to invest time in configuration for long-term benefits.

Pricing and ROI: Stackify generally involves lower setup costs and provides attractive ROI for smaller businesses due to its affordable pricing structure and immediate operational benefits. In contrast, Splunk Observability Cloud requires higher initial costs but justifies this with an extensive feature set and scalability, offering significant ROI over time for larger organizations seeking comprehensive data insights.

To learn more, read our detailed Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Stackify Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Stackify

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,545 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

9th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (6th), Cloud Monitoring Software (8th), Container Management (7th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (2nd)

Stackify

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

60th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

58th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (64th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 1.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stackify is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Lakshmi Padaga

Java Developer at U.S. Bank

Collaborates performance metrics with log data to pinpoint the exact cause of issues and offers error detection

Splunk APM is a robust tool with many capabilities. There are always areas for potential improvement to enhance its functionality and user experience. For Splunk APM, there could be simplified navigation, like streamlining the user interface to make navigation more intuitive for our users, especially those new to APM, which can enhance usability. We can provide more customization options for dashboards and visualizations to help users tailor the platform to their specific needs. There could be more integration capabilities with a wider range of third-party tools and platforms would also be beneficial. By focusing on these areas, Splunk APM can enhance its value proposition, improve user satisfaction, and better meet the evolving needs of organizations monitoring their application performance.

Read full review

Moses Arigbede

Head of DevOps at Partsimony

Easy to set up with great custom dashboards but needs to improve non-.NET infrastructure

They need to improve non-.NET infrastructure. We always had difficulty when it comes to reporting or metrics that come from Linux operating systems and Docker containers. For anything that runs within the Unix environment, we always had problems with them, however, if it was a document-based application, Stackify was 100%, it gave everything. Now, the aggregation agent, the metric agent for Stackify for Linux, collects everything. When I say everything, I mean, everything. It collects so much information that we now started to term it as useless data as all that ingestion will just come in and overwhelm your log retention limit for the month and really this spike up your cost at the end of the month. You'll need to do a lot in order to train down the data coming in from all your Linux environments, to get to what you really need, which actually takes some time as well. I would like to be able to see metrics about individual running containers on the host machines. Stackify has not really gotten that right, as far as I'm concerned. Netdata has done a better job and New Relic has also done a better job. They need to improve on that. We need to be able to see the individual resource usage of containers running within a particular host.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup of Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM) was easy."

"The most valuable features are troubleshooting and optimizing application performance."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to customize dashboards based on my queries or any other customization I may need."

"It supports proactive management, enhances security, and improves operational efficiency."

"The most valuable thing that we have seen within our group is the ability to ingest all this raw data and have it organized in a certain way so that different groups can get effective alerting from this massive amount of raw data that is out there."

"It's beneficial for monitoring performance and infrastructure, especially when deploying applications with multiple versions with Git."

"I like the fact that Splunk APM makes it easy to connect to the application database and run queries against the data."

"I manage six tools, but Splunk Observability Cloud is one of my favorites, and I aspire to build my career specializing in it because it has great features, more attention in the market, and is a relatively new tool with promising growth."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pros

"The deployment is very fast."

"The performance dashboard and the accurate level of details are beneficial."

"The filter feature on Stackify is one of the features I found valuable. It's awesome. When I want to get the application logs, the solution gives me many filters. For example, if I want to get logs from my test environment, the option is there for me to select the environment from Stackify, and you can also select the particular application, and you'll see the information you need there. The filter feature alone and the fact that Stackify offers a lot of different filters is what I like the most about the solution because I've used other tools with the filter feature, but the filtering was very difficult, versus Stackify that has good filtering. On Stackify, you can filter the information by the last one hour, or the last four hours, and you can also select the date range and specify the timestamp, then the solution will give you the information based on the date range you specified. Another feature I found valuable on Stackify is its rating feature because it tells you how your application is faring. For example, a rating of A means excellent, while a rating of F means very bad, or that your application is not doing well at all. The ratings are from A to F. I also like that Stackify helps you in terms of load management because the solution gives you information on overutilized resources. These are the most valuable features of the solution."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the alerting system, which is complicated and has less documentation available."

"The implementation can be more user-friendly."

"In future updates, I would like to see more predefined monitoring query solutions, which could be more effective."

"There is a lot of room for improvement with the automation."

"In the next release, I would like to see more integration with other solutions."

"It does not have a user-friendly interface and it is difficult to use."

"The UI enhancements could be a way to improve the solution in the future."

"I would like to see an improvement and some innovation in the customer interface."

More Splunk Observability Cloud cons

"It should be easily scalable and configurable in different instances."

"I've not used Stackify for a while, and I'm currently using a solution now that's not as good as Stackify. Among the solutions I've been using so far, Stackify has been one of the best for me, but there's always room for improvement. For example, I don't know if it's just me, but when I try to get the log from Stackify, sometimes it doesn't appear in real-time. It takes a few minutes before the logs appear. When I redeploy my solution and the application starts, I don't see the logs immediately, and it would take two to three minutes before I see the logs. I don't know if other customers have a similar experience. It's the wait time for the logs to appear that's a concern for me, could be improved, and is what the Stackify team should be looking into. In terms of any additional feature that I'd like added to the solution, I'm not sure if Stackify has a way to export logs out. I've been trying to do it. On the solution, you can click on a spiral-like icon and it shows you the entire error, and I'd prefer an export button that would let me download the error and save that into a text file, for example, so it'll be available on my local machine for me to reference it, especially because the log keeps going and as you're using the solution, the system keeps pushing messages on to Stackify, so if I'm looking at a particular error at 12:05 PM, for example, by the time I go back to my system and would like to revisit the error at 12:25 PM, on Stackify, the logs would have gone past that level and I won't see it again which makes it difficult. When you now go back to that timestamp, you don't tend to see it immediately, but if the solution had an export feature for me to save that particular error information on my local machine for reference at a later time, I won't have to go back to Stackify. I just go to that log, specifically to that particular export that I've received on my local machine. I can get it and review it, and it would be easier that way versus me going back to Stackify to find that particular error and request that particular information."

"I would like to be able to see metrics about individual running containers on the host machines."

"The search feature could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Splunk's infrastructure monitoring costs can be high because our billing is based on data volume measured in terabytes, rather than the number of devices being monitored."

"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is an expensive solution."

"Splunk APM is a very cost-efficient solution."

"Splunk APM is expensive."

"The price of Splunk APM is less than some of its competitors."

"Splunk has been fairly expensive, but it has been predictable."

"It is expensive."

"The solution's pricing is costly."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice

"The price is variable. It depends on how much data we have received in that particular month. Usually, it goes up to $2,000, or, at times, $3,000 USD per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,545 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Media Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SignalFx?

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

SigNoz vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

New Relic vs Stackify

Compared 43% of the time

Dynatrace vs Stackify

Compared 38% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Stackify

Compared 18% of the time

More Stackify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

June 2025

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Stackify

June 2025

Download Stackify product report

Also Known As

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

No data available

Overview

Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.

What are the key features?

Log Searching: Efficiently search and analyze logs from various sources.
Data Integration: Seamlessly integrate with multiple environments.
Dashboard Customization: Tailor dashboards to specific monitoring needs.
Monitoring Capabilities: Provides comprehensive insights into application performance.
Security Features: Analyze and address security threats across systems.
Visualization Tools: Enhance data analysis and system performance optimization.

Why consider this for ROI?

Comprehensive Visibility: Gain complete insights into IT infrastructure.
Performance Optimization: Improve overall system performance and efficiency.
Rapid Deployment: Quick setup to meet organization demands swiftly.
Enhanced Security: Strengthen security measures through detailed analytics.

In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.

Splunk

Stackify is an application performance management (APM) solution that combines application performance monitoring with logs, errors, and reporting. It is a SaaS solution that is developer-focused. Users can quickly scan, identify, and repair issues with applications. Stackify APM offers valuable tools, such as Prefix and Retrace, which help to make it a comprehensive and valuable APM solution. Stackify is now part of the Netreo family of IT Infrastructure Management (ITIM), which is considered one of the fastest-growing IT organizations in the marketplace today.

Stackify Prefix

Stackify Prefix helps developers write better code, faster. The tool examines, tests, and approves code as it is being written. Almost every new application is code-perfect, negating the need for exhausting troubleshooting and frustrating time-consuming code review.

Prefix is able to discover poor-performing SQL queries, ORM queries, potential bottlenecks, and concealed exceptions prior to moving the application into production.

Prefix offers Summary Dashboards, intuitive suggestions, integrated logs, and distributed tracing. Distributed tracing expands visibility to cloud-native applications, microservices, and containers and can also provide additional transparency to cache services, web services, third-party services, and more. Users are able to easily move from logs to traces and back.

This valuable tool ensures developers are able to consistently release the best code possible in the least amount of time, while improving performance, productivity, and profitability.

Prefix is a very robust and easy-to-use tool. It can be used seamlessly with Linux, macOS, and Windows. Prefix integrates well with numerous languages, such as Java, Python, Ruby, PHP, Node.js, .Net, and .Net Core.

Stackify Retrace

Stackify Retrace is a user-friendly, trusted APM solution used in more than fifty countries worldwide. Users know that Retrace is able to ensure they can complete quicker, more efficient application development and consistently enhance overall application performance by suggesting important intuitive suggestions users need.

This solution is beneficial to both developers (Dev) and operations (Ops) personnel to learn to improve code and immediately finetune issues by:

Establishing effortless collaboration between Dev and Ops personnel via an easy-to-use GUI dashboard.
Delivering complete transparency of all stages of the application development process, from pre-development to production.
Utilizing performance protocols, such as error tracking, application logs, and code profiling, in real time in order to thoroughly understand how long a code will take to complete various tasks.
Improving overall efficiency and productivity by immediately discovering and repairing application issues.

Retrace Real User Monitoring (RUM) uses both front-end and back-end monitoring to give users a complete picture of what is going on with the applications. This intuitive dashboard displays performance with a complete breakdown of resource usage and integrates the server-side and client traces into one engaging, user-friendly, extensive view.

Retrace is an out-of-the-box solution that works seamlessly with Java stacks, PHP, Node.js, Ruby, Python, .Net, and .Net Core. It is also compatible with many of today’s popular frameworks, such as AWS, Azure, Elasticsearch, MongoDB, MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL, Redis, and SQL Server. Additionally, Retrace will work effectively with many cloud providers, containers, and languages, and offers excellent and easy integration with today's favorite tools such as Jira, Slack, Jenkins, and more.

Stackify

Sample Customers

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

MyRacePass, ClearSale, Newitts, Carbonite, Boston Software, Children's International, Starkwood Media Group, Fewzion

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Stackify

May 2025

Free Report: Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Stackify

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Stackify and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,545 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Stackify report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.