SnapLogic vs TIBCO Scribe comparison

"An important tool for building prototypes and MVPs than can seamlessly turn into production jobs"

"I would tell others looking into using SnapLogic to use it, take it, use it, and use it, because you can't go beyond SnapLogic and SnapLogic is not going to give you any kind of bad experience, definitely."

"It's more developer-friendly, and development can be done at a faster phase."

"The API architecture makes it easy for orchestration."

"The solution is great due to the fact that it is really flexible."

"They are very good at building out new aspects according to customer requirements."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The vendor handles the maintenance of the solution"

"The most valuable feature of TIBCO Scribe is the connectors available to various products."

"We'd like there to be more ways for users to get more comfortable and have more experience with the solution to make it easier to use."

"Connecting to data behind enterprise firewalls has been tricky."

"The dashboards regarding scheduled tasks need further improvement."

"Ultra Pipelines provides real-time ingestion but it needs some adjustment."

"We'd like zero downtime in the future."

"SnapLogic sits somewhere in the middle. It doesn’t offer enough easy canned integrations for its users like some of the easier to use integration apps."

"What could be improved in SnapLogic is that it was not capable in terms of processing a large number of datasets, but at that point, SnapLogic was evolving. It didn't give a lot of Snaps. I heard recently there are a lot of Snaps getting added and the solution was being enhanced, particularly to connect different data sources. When I was working with SnapLogic six months to one year back, I faced the issue of it not being capable of handling a huge volume of datasets or didn't have much of Snaps, and that was the drawback. If there is any large number of data sets, that's based on or depends on your configuration. If it is a huge volume of data, other traditional ETL tools such as Informatica and Talend can process millions and billions of records, while in SnapLogic, the Snaplex fails or it returns an error in terms of processing that huge volume of data. Informatica, Talend, or any other ETL tool can run for hours in terms of jobs, while SnapLogic jobs fail when the threshold is reached. SnapLogic isn't able to withstand processing, but I don't know if that's still an issue at present, because the solution is getting enhanced and it's been more than six months to one year since I last worked with SnapLogic. There are now a lot of Snaps getting added to the solution, and if it can overcome the limitations I mentioned, SnapLogic could be the go-to tool because currently, it's not being used as much in organizations. It's being used comparatively less compared to other retail tools."

"They should expand in terms of features for SaaS-based market requirements in different sectors."

"The solution should provide better documentation and scenario-based samples."

"When comparing it with solutions like Apigee or MuleSoft, it still offers better value."

"The cost with SnapLogic is an annual license and better than Informatica."

"The pricing is okay."

"By scaling the solution incrementally the cost is controlled and more beneficial to the client."

"It is a higher initial cost than other easy-to-use integration apps."

"The license model is based on consumption."

"SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."

"From the ROI perspective, the price is extremely high"