No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

SmartRecruiters vs Workday Recruiting comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SmartRecruiters
Ranking in Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software
3rd
Ranking in Talent Acquisition
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Workday Recruiting
Ranking in Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software
43rd
Ranking in Talent Acquisition
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
AI-Recruiting (7th)
 

Featured Reviews

SUMANTA  GHOSH - PeerSpot reviewer
Regional Recruitment Lead at IQ-EQ
A user-friendly tool that functions without any glitches
With SmartRecruiters, compatibility with other HRIS systems is an area with certain shortcomings that require improvement. SmartRecruiters is a tool that we use as an ATS platform in our company, but we manage the employee lifecycle with the help of SAP, and I don't see the integration of SmartRecruiters with SAP happening quite seamlessly, making it an area where improvements are required.
ManishGupta9 - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Director & CEO at Talenton Global
Unified hiring workflows have transformed recruiting into a data-driven talent strategy
While Workday Recruiting provides a strong enterprise recruiting platform, I would still see there are several areas where it could be improved to make recruitment a bit more faster, more intelligent decision-making, very candidate-centric and more effective for recruiters and hiring managers. Improvements have already been made on a few aspects like improving the AI powered candidate matching, but it could make AI matching more sophisticated by going beyond the resume keywords and just the job title. For example, potential improvements could include matching the candidates based on transferable skills, career trajectory, and potential, identifying hidden talent who do not have the exact job title but still possess the right capabilities and skills and experience, and explaining why a candidate is recommended with at least some summary providing confidence scores and eliminating the potential bias. There are a few other aspects to strengthen the passive candidate sourcing as well. This could be their biggest opportunity. Many of the best candidates, particularly senior executives and specialist talent, do not actively apply for jobs. Improvements could include external talent discovery, passive candidate identification, talent market mapping, competitor talent mapping as well, executive talent intelligence, and making the candidate experience more personalized where they can receive more personalized career recommendation, job suggestions, and real-time application updates. Recruiters still can benefit from more reduction of the recruiter administrative task because recruiters still spend a significant time on operational tasks in terms of screening, coordination for interviews, follow-ups, status updates and reminders, recruiting reports, and so recruiters should spend more time talking to candidates rather than managing the system alone. In terms of the analytics, better recruiting analysis and predictive intelligence, moving from just descriptive analytics to predictive recruiting intelligence, is where Workday could add a lot more value. Instead of just simply reporting time to fill is, let's say, 70 days, Workday could still say that position is likely to take maybe 80 days, 75 days to fill because the available talent pool is limited and consider expanding the geography or adjustment in the compensation or expand the search reach, whatever. Those kinds of analytics would be helpful. Improvements could go higher, but some improvement areas need Workday to make a few improvements to make skill-based recruiting even more powerful. It could develop a more dynamic enterprise skills graph as well. For example, current employee skills or adjacent skills, potential career paths, future roles, or reskilling opportunities could be included. This would connect the whole recruiting team with internal mobility, workforce planning, learning, reskilling, succession planning, and retention of the existing employees. Improving the diversity bias and monitoring is important. If Workday can do this, AI recruiting creates an additional responsibility around the fairness and companies and everybody have the responsibility to be fair. Workday could provide a stronger real-time monitoring of candidate sourcing diversity, funneling the conversion by demographic groups, potential algorithmic bias, interview score patterns, and selection rate differences. Those are a few things Workday can improve on and can achieve a higher score.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a reliable system, and you can use it for the full cycle of recruitment, easily configuring and adapting it to your processes while everything is tracked in one place."
"It has a lot of good features. We post all of our jobs through the system, and they have a marketplace where you can share the job post with the job boards they're working with. It is integrated with all the records about from where the applications are coming. We have all of our candidates gathered there. We can set up our own hiring processes depending on the type of job and then move them through the process there. It is also possible to involve hiring managers and give them access so that they can also track the candidates and have a look at TBE and interact in the system, which is very useful. We also use SmartRecruiters for job approvals before posting the job as well as for offer approvals before sending an offer. We have everything in the system itself, and everything is being tracked, which is very good for us. It is a reliable system, and you can use it for the full cycle of recruitment. You can really adapt it to your processes. When it comes to the configuration, it is easy to configure. Something that is good with SmartRecruiters is that they are always working on improvements. Every quarter, they have different enhancements or product releases, which is something that we appreciate."
"It has a neat functionality built in where it rates candidates. So, before you even look at the resume, you see a rating, and it is based on keywords. For example, it will tell you that an applicant is a frontend engineer and has used React, Angular, etc. It gives you a heads up so that you don't have to go through a hundred resumes on Monday morning eliminating applicants. It will tell you that this applicant's skills match 87%, which is pretty neat. You can skip the ones that are rated 25% or something."
"The all-encompassing ability to manage the process cohesively out of the SmartRecruiter system was valuable."
"The candidate experience was better because the whole process was there."
"It is a really user-friendly tool, and its implementation is quite wide. It is very easy to manage users and build your workflows. Overall, it works very well for the customization of the workflows for us. The recruitment team has generally found the whole platform useful. We were looking to kind of expand it by using the CRM functions that it has. However, with COVID and recruitment being on the freeze, we weren't really able to make the most of the tool. They are, however, finding it useful to actually build up their talent pools and client candidates to be able to contact them when we kind of have this freeze off."
"It is a really user-friendly tool, and its implementation is quite wide."
"Once we implemented SmartRecruiters, it meant that we were able to have a consolidated global overview of all the recruitment activities."
"Workday definitely helps transform the whole recruiting from an administrative function into a lot more data driven talent management process with analytics."
 

Cons

"I don't see the integration of SmartRecruiters with SAP happening quite seamlessly, making it an area where improvements are required."
"Around 2015 and into '17, I worked at a federal contractor. I had to switch to a different applicant system as I didn't know if SmartRecruiters was OFCCP compliant, which is something that, as a US-based federal contractor, you have to ensure. They should work to appeal to the contractor industry and get the product OFCCP compliant."
"Some features are not as straightforward or user friendly to implement."
"We ran into some serious issues related to language barriers."
"The major improvement area is how it integrates with other systems; that's where we've had some sort of pain points."
"The solution needs to work on a single sign-on."
"The filters are not accurate. The results are inaccurate when filtering multiple criteria, such as country and hiring manager."
"One thing that has been a bit of a struggle is getting tech support."
"Workday Recruiting's pricing experience is reasonable for a large enterprise company, but a bit more complex and potentially expensive for SMEs and smaller organizations because it is an enterprise-level recruiting platform."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There were implementation costs in the first year to get everything set up and running, and then they have various modules on top, which are optional and available at an extra charge."
"Back in 2018, when I engaged with their sales, they wanted to charge around $10,000 for an annual subscription. Depending on your organization, that either could or couldn't be expensive. I personally think it's a fair price. However, I engaged them and negotiated a lower price with them. I think I got closer to $6,000. It came with a commitment of three years."
"They are pretty competitive. As the product matures, it has much more functionality and different pricing models. It can relatively cost a lot more if you want to use additional features, but, in general, it is competitive in the industry. We work on a yearly license agreement based on the company size. There are the support costs, which are a part of the additional cost based on the percentage of the licensing fee. So, it has a license plus support cost. Then, of course, there are other add-on options that we can purchase and procure whenever we want to based on certain negotiated arrangements."
"I haven't been so involved with pricing, so I don't have all details, but I know that we are paying per head when it comes to different countries. There is an additional fee for new features that they release. If it is something that we would like to use, we need to pay some extra for it."
"SmartRecruiters is an expensive solution."
"I wasn't involved in its acquisition, but I would assume that SmartRecruiters is pretty pricey."
"SmartRecruiters is much better than its competitors. Considering the type of features and services it provides, it is probably one of the best solutions in the market. Others may offer a similar price, but their services won't be that good or the user-friendliness won't be that great. The licensing works based on how many users are there in a company. If you are using other functionalities, like CRM and HRS, the price increases."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software solutions are best for your needs.
919,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise8
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workday Recruiting?
Workday Recruiting's pricing experience is reasonable for a large enterprise company, but a bit more complex and potentially expensive for SMEs and smaller organizations because it is an enterprise...
What needs improvement with Workday Recruiting?
While Workday Recruiting provides a strong enterprise recruiting platform, I would still see there are several areas where it could be improved to make recruitment a bit more faster, more intellige...
What is your primary use case for Workday Recruiting?
I have several main use cases for Workday Recruiting: workforce planning and requisitions, candidate sourcing applications, recruiter and hiring manager workflow, selection, offer management, candi...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Atlassian, Aol, IBM, Napa, Skechers
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about iCIMS, Zoho, SmartRecruiters and others in Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software. Updated: October 2026.
919,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.