We performed a comparison between SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis NeoLoad based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well."
"The initial setup is pretty easy and it's quick to deploy."
"Selenium integration."
"It is a strong automation tool for desktop, browser, and API testing."
"The ease-of-use and quality of the overall product are above average."
"It's cross platform automation capabilities specially ranging across web, UNIX (via putty), and other systems."
"Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution."
"I like the cross browser compatibility. It saves a lot of time re-writing scripts to accommodate different browsers."
"The dashboards give extensive statistics, which help with quick report preparation and analysis."
"In my opinion, correlation of dynamic data is the most important advantage of this tool."
"It offered us an easy to use, limited code option for end-to-end performance testing."
"The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good."
"The stability is okay."
"I feel that the codeless part, the dynamic value capture part is quite easy in NeoLoad compared to other tools."
"NeoLoad is actually really good, mainly because they have a world-class support service."
"It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty."
"This solution could be improved by making it easier to visualize where there is a failure without having to look at it in detail."
"If that engine could better identify more XPaths automatically and make the process more flexible, that would be better."
"The solution needs to extend the possibilities so that we can test on other operating systems, platforms and publications for Android as well as iOS."
"TestComplete gives support to do requests to a SOAP web service but has no support to do HTTP requests on Restful services."
"We were testing handheld barcode scanners running WindowsCE with many menus of warehouse functions, and our biggest problem was the timing between input and responses."
"The pricing is the constraint."
"The integration tools could be better."
"Product is not stable enough and it crashes often."
"Tricentis NeoLoad crashes if an application contains more than 1,000 scripts."
"It needs improvements in the UI. It's currently not as friendly as it should be."
"It needs improvement with post-production."
"The solution’s pricing is higher compared to other tools. Though the product’s reports are accurate, it needs to be more detailed like other tools."
"Regular and strong support has to be made available by Tricentis during the solution's implementation and initial setup."
"There is room for improvement with the support and community documentation as it can be difficult to find answers to questions quickly."
"An area for improvement in Tricentis NeoLoad is its price, as it has a hefty price tag."
"I would like to see support for auto-correlations."
SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 8th in Test Automation Tools with 70 reviews while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 57 reviews. SmartBear TestComplete is rated 7.6, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "A stable product that needs to improve its integration capabilities with other test management tools". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Supports SAP and non-SAP applications and helps identify performance issues before production deployment". SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, Ranorex Studio, OpenText UFT One and froglogic Squish, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Tricentis Tosca and BlazeMeter.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.