SharePoint vs Workplace by Facebook comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Microsoft and Meta solutions aren't in the same category. Microsoft is ranked #1 in ECM , with an average rating of 8.2, and holds a 12.1% mindshare in the category. Meta is ranked #15 in ESS , and holds a 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 79% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Meta users who would recommend it.

SharePoint

Read 166 SharePoint reviews

22,716 Views
12,721 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Workplace by Facebook

Read 5 Workplace by Facebook reviews

1,263 Views
973 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePoint

Workplace by Facebook

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SharePoint and Workplace by Facebook based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 916,956 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SharePoint

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

166

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (1st), Web Content Management (2nd), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)

Workplace by Facebook

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Social Software (15th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Messaging and Collaboration solutions, they serve different purposes. SharePoint is designed for Enterprise Content Management and holds a mindshare of 12.1%, down 14.6% compared to last year.
Workplace by Facebook, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Social Software, holds 2.8% mindshare, up 2.7% since last year.

Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SharePoint	12.1%
OpenText Documentum Content Management	7.0%
Alfresco	5.8%
Other	75.1%

Enterprise Content Management

Enterprise Social Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Workplace by Facebook	2.8%
Slack Business - Enterprise	9.8%
Atlassian Confluence	6.9%
Other	80.5%

Enterprise Social Software

Featured Reviews

AnjneyBhardwaj

Senior Market Research Analyst at IDC Corporate

Collaboration has improved through simplified document access and controlled sharing

SharePoint is definitely used to keep a record of our files and data. The capability is quite good because it is time-saving. I have used it only four or five times, but it has been very helpful to keep all my information in a consolidated manner. The search feature is one of the most beneficial factors that we use to filter out the latest data or the latest file as per our convenience and use case. When you have a large repository, this feature is particularly valuable. Role-based access control has been helpful while developing the knowledge platform. The roles were defined clearly, which made it easy for the four or five of us to work simultaneously and collaborate on our project in a similar manner.

Read full review

Aryan Singh1

Product Manager at Infozion

Offers good integration features but needs to offer more flexibility in the language option offered

There are a couple of things that can be improved in the tool. When we are talking about communications, the tool has interoperable cataloging. The only thing that needs a certain level of improvement within Meta is the vernacular, which can be dependent, as we cannot choose the process of communication that is happening in it. After I launch a bot, if I move from one country to another, and if the entire communication is happening in German, while I have just moved from France, and I need to buy a particular choice of vehicle, then I would want the entire communication to happen in my language. What Meta does not allow as of now is that if I am reaching out to you in French, then only you can have the conversation in French. You cannot select a language in the middle of a conversation. If I want to have a conversation in French, there is a very limited selection. Until and unless a conversation is triggered from a particular language, we do not have the option to choose another language. The tool gives you flexibility in the language, but that is on the business and not on the customer, which sometimes limits the approachability aspect.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The search feature is valuable."

"The access control is definitely a good feature. We also appreciate the improvements they've made to the online applications, where multiple users can work on the same documents simultaneously. Everything syncs automatically."

"Information is now available instantly to managers on all devices."

"Our staff found it simpler, as they did not have to work within a classification system."

"Its functionality is enormous."

"It has improved our productivity to a great extent with its great collaboration features."

"SharePoint has made things easier with the increased functionality for building the portals, microsites, and total integration with Microsoft categories."

"It has allowed my team to seamlessly share requirements with one another and provide feedback while working off one version."

More SharePoint pros

"The tool's integration feature benefited the workflow...it helped centralize communication."

"The product was easy to use."

"The biggest lesson we have learned from working with Workplace is that we should have made the change a lot earlier."

"A full-featured collaboration tool that is as easy to use as Facebook."

"Storage is the best thing about the solution."

"The solution is used as a knowledge platform for sharing knowledge and information that everybody can easily access."

Cons

"The pricing and licensing is one of the most crucial parts of using Microsoft SharePoint."

"One issue is that when users mistakenly hide files or set permissions incorrectly, it can lead to files becoming inaccessible, requiring intervention from Microsoft support to resolve."

"It is not really better; we use the same solution as before with Google Drive and the Google App solution."

"It has worked very well for me. It seems like they've improved everything. I don't have any cons about it as such, but I don't think they have a talk-to-text, speech-to-text, or speech-to-type. That would be cool for accessibility."

"The user profile synchronization feature is cumbersome to configure and at least initially had some stability issues."

"During uptime under our network, it is hard to find info when content is hefty."

"The product could be more intuitive both from an administrative point of view and from an end user point of view."

"Analytics and reporting is an area with room for improvement. It should provide more complex-process automation out of the box."

More SharePoint cons

"The implementation could be made easier."

"What Meta does not allow as of now is that if I am reaching out to you in French, then only you can have the conversation in French. You cannot select a language in the middle of a conversation."

"The conferencing feature does not work well with multiple parties or locations."

"There needs to be a restriction on who can download content."

"The product should allow users to assign tasks and automate processes."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is pretty reasonable. It is $5 per month per user. We have 12 users now, so it is about $60 per month."

"The solution's pricing is relatively expensive because it's bundled with other products."

"For this type of solution, it is not wise to buy it without Software Assurance."

"Any extended support from Microsoft is expensive."

"It is very expensive."

"The pricing works for us."

"SharePoint is included with our Microsoft license."

"The licensing model for SharePoint Online is based on per user, and it is monthly. The price of the solution overall is good."

More SharePoint pricing and cost advice

"The cost has become one-tenth of the cost in comparison to the old techniques. As we were able to qualify and nurture these leads, the overall cost of the entire sales process was reduced."

"The solution seemed expensive to me."

"The regular package costs us $4 per user per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8925

Developer with 51-200 employees

Aug 23, 2013

Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons

At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	84

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?

I do not know the difference between the prices of the two solutions; I did not work on this project.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SharePoint?

I don't know how SharePoint can be improved because it works effectively, so I can't think of any improvement. It exists in the background, similar to Windows, where you don't think about it, but i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SharePoint?

I have been using SharePoint for three years since I began employment at Wartsila. My main use case for SharePoint is storing documents, meeting recordings, and visiting websites created by my coll...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 16% of the time

Atlassian Confluence vs SharePoint

Compared 4% of the time

Box - Intelligent Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 3% of the time

IBM FileNet vs SharePoint

Compared 3% of the time

More SharePoint Competitors

Slack Business - Enterprise vs Workplace by Facebook

Compared 19% of the time

Liferay Digital Experience Platform vs Workplace by Facebook

Compared 8% of the time

Yammer vs Workplace by Facebook

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian Confluence vs Workplace by Facebook

Compared 8% of the time

ChatWork vs Workplace by Facebook

Compared 7% of the time

More Workplace by Facebook Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SharePoint

September 2026

Download SharePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Social Software

October 2026

Download Workplace by Facebook product report

Also Known As

SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010

Facebook Workplace, Facebook at Work

Overview

SharePoint offers document management, collaboration, and Microsoft Office integration, with a user-friendly interface supporting workflows and customization. Organizations benefit from centralized content storage, improving team coordination and efficiency.

SharePoint is tailored for document and content management, offering collaboration tools, workflow automation, and integration with Microsoft products. It supports robust search, metadata tagging, and access control. While performance and the interface require enhancements, it remains a valuable tool for organizations managing internal and external communications. Integration with Microsoft Teams and OneDrive facilitates collaboration, and SharePoint's centralized repositories and document storage enhance team efficiency. Power Platform integration allows for quick data handling and automation, boosting productivity.

What Are the Most Notable Features of SharePoint?

Document Management: Organize and manage documents efficiently.
Collaboration Tools: Enhance team collaboration and communication.
Microsoft Office Integration: Seamlessly work with Office applications.
Search Capabilities: Robust search and metadata tagging for easy retrieval.
Access Control: Protect and manage sensitive information access.
Power Platform Integration: Quick data handling and automation for improved productivity.

What Benefits Should Users Look for When Evaluating SharePoint?

Improved Team Efficiency: Enhance coordination and document sharing.
Centralized Storage: Efficient content management in a centralized repository.
Seamless Workflow Automation: Automate processes to boost productivity.
Integration Capability: Enhance functionality with external services and applications.
Customization Options: Tailor workflows and user experience to business needs.

In various industries, SharePoint is used for document and content management, supporting specific department sites and internal communications. It facilitates automation and policy management while offering integration with Microsoft Teams and OneDrive for improved collaboration and geographical team coordination.

Microsoft

Workplace by Facebook offers intuitive communication and collaboration tools for businesses, making it easy to manage conversations and projects while providing seamless integration with existing systems.

Designed for corporate communication, Workplace by Facebook features a Facebook-like interface for easy adoption. It supports storage and retrieval of past conversations and project files. While lacking direct API access, it integrates with systems like Microsoft Dynamics and Adobe Marketo through business service providers. However, it faces challenges in multi-party conferencing and language selection flexibility. An overwhelming number of groups and lack of task automation are noted concerns. Despite these, it remains popular for internal communication, HR collaboration, and client interactions utilizing Meta facilities.

What are the key features of Workplace by Facebook?

Familiar Interface: Ease of use with a design similar to Facebook.
Storage Capabilities: Efficiently stores and retrieves past conversations.
Knowledge Library: Centralized information-sharing platform.
Collaboration Tools: Posting, groups, and surveys enhance teamwork.
Integration: Compatible with systems like Microsoft Dynamics and Adobe Marketo.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Easy Adoption: Familiar interface speeds up onboarding.
Enhanced Collaboration: Tools that promote team engagement.
Flexible Integration: Adapts to legacy systems via providers.
Efficient Communication: Supports internal updates and HR tasks.

Workplace by Facebook is actively used in corporate settings for managing internal communication and project tracking. Businesses incorporate workplace software for announcements, executive blogs, and HR collaboration, often integrating it with marketing tools like WhatsApp and Adobe Marketo to improve client interaction networks.

Sample Customers

Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.

Royal Bank of Scotland, UST Global, DNB Bank, Smart, IJM Corporation, Telenor Group, Mobilink, Landmark Group, Yes Bank, BrightTALK, Kenshoo, Godrej Consumer Products

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.