SharePoint vs Workplace by Facebook comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
7,894 views|6,463 comparisons
77% willing to recommend
Meta Logo
668 views|550 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SharePoint and Workplace by Facebook based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It improved transparency around work products.""Information is much more readily available.""The security feature is valuable.""The ability to take Excel files and make them dynamic SharePoint lists with instant reporting capabilities has been a major benefit.""We can now share to team members by MS Teams and assign planners to follow and update statuses in a single platform.""We can arrange all our documents on one platform and see the document's changes and edits.""​Combined reports and data with timeline tracking.""It is well supported by Microsoft."

More SharePoint Pros →

"Storage is the best thing about the solution.""The solution is used as a knowledge platform for sharing knowledge and information that everybody can easily access.""The product was easy to use.""A full-featured collaboration tool that is as easy to use as Facebook."

More Workplace by Facebook Pros →

Cons
"It has worked very well for me. It seems like they've improved everything. I don't have any cons about it as such, but I don't think they have a talk-to-text, speech-to-text, or speech-to-type. That would be cool for accessibility.""I would like it to be more compliant with global regulations. There are certain features which could be included that currently are not there, such as compliance and record management capabilities.""SharePoint sometimes cannot handle the amount of co-editing that we do.""Emails stored now do not display metadata in native format.""This solution would benefit from the implementation of enhanced online forms and template development capabilities.""The management of the product/back-end is complex.""It is too heavy. MS should not have paid foreign coders dollars per each row of code. They wasted the stability and reliability in the end.""It should have more user-friendly customization, as it still requires developers to get engaged and build sites."

More SharePoint Cons →

"The implementation could be made easier.""There needs to be a restriction on who can download content.""The conferencing feature does not work well with multiple parties or locations.""The product should allow users to assign tasks and automate processes."

More Workplace by Facebook Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "As usual, Microsoft’s licensing structures don’t really seem to fit the needs of their products. This leads to always paying for a project you will never use fully or always be adding to."
  • "Licensing can be by server or by seat."
  • "It is very expensive.​"
  • "The data classification and search elements are cheap."
  • "The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."
  • "We have purchased add-ons to handle multiple site collections, form creation, and design."
  • "The cost is expensive, but worthwhile."
  • "The pricing works for us."
  • More SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The regular package costs us $4 per user per month."
  • "The solution seemed expensive to me."
  • More Workplace by Facebook Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a round-up of a couple of the more well known platforms and compare their products to Drupal. In this roundup we will be comparing Jive, Sharepoint and Drupal Commons. Drupal Commons is a popular distribution created by Acquia to compete with some of these other proprietary platforms. There are many other options out there, commercial and otherwise, to compare with Drupal but I want to focus on Jive and Sharepoint for a couple of reasons. I chose Jive because it is one of the leading competitors in this space in respect to market share. Next, I chose Sharepoint because I have some history with Sharepoint. This experience dates back to when I built www.adhe.edu with Sharepoint 2007 a few years ago. I subsequently wrote this blog entry about my experience shortly after joining Mediacurrent. This roundup will also act as a refresher for those who read my original “Drupal vs. Sharepoint” blog. Yammer, which was recently bought by Microsoft and is the tool we currently use for office communication will also get some mentions throughout this article. As I went through and tested each of these tools I used three main criteria in my evaluation Cost Ability to Customize Overall features… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Alfresco scores are high on all features of an ECM solution and tools.   Back office processing, rated as 3.36 good.  Business Process Application 3.55 Good to excellent.  Document Management 4.12… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is competitive. That's why almost all the companies are using SharePoint. I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. When we buy the license, the person buying must be well-educated on how the… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is used as a knowledge platform for sharing knowledge and information that everybody can easily access.
    Top Answer:There needs to be a restriction on who can download content. You don't want people to download organization documents from the system, and currently, there's no restriction to that. There should also… more »
    Top Answer:We use the solution for collaboration and information sharing.
    Ranking
    Views
    7,894
    Comparisons
    6,463
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    562
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    668
    Comparisons
    550
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    389
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
    Facebook Workplace, Facebook at Work
    Learn More
    Overview

    SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

    Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

    Facebook Workplace is a dedicated and secure space for companies to connect, communicate and collaborate. Organizations of all sizes can use familiar Facebook features such as News Feed, groups, messages and events to get things done.

    Sample Customers
    Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
    Royal Bank of Scotland, UST Global, DNB Bank, Smart, IJM Corporation, Telenor Group, Mobilink, Landmark Group, Yes Bank, BrightTALK, Kenshoo, Godrej Consumer Products
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    University8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Insurance Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 146 reviews while Workplace by Facebook is ranked 9th in Enterprise Social Software with 4 reviews. SharePoint is rated 7.8, while Workplace by Facebook is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Workplace by Facebook writes "A scalable and easy-to-use solution that can be used for internal communication and storage". SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and WordPress, whereas Workplace by Facebook is most compared with Yammer.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.