Seqrite UTM vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM comparison

"It has an MDM solution."

"The dashboard is very good-looking and offers maximum features. If a customer's website has a problem, we can guide them over the phone because they can easily find the specific option on the dashboard. That's why we suggest buying Sophos."

"Web and content filtering are valuable in preventing people from abusing the network and pushing up the bandwidth price."

"User and network policies to be managed on a single screen with powerful filtering and search options."

"I find Sophos Cyberoam UTM very good. I like the feature of being able to block off Mac IDs that host users. For example, you have a Mac or Windows laptop and you created a hotspot. Other devices like mobiles and tablets e.g. iPads connected to that hotspot. We can block those devices that connected to the hotspot we created, only through Sophos. It's a good feature we didn't find in other UTMs."

"The features that I find most valuable in Sophos Cyberoam UTM is the RED, the Sophos RED, which is the SD-WAN, a very welcome feature that has made us fully transition out of the paid MPLS to SD-WANs."

"Bandwidth Management and aggregation is valuable for combining two ISPs, making switching to a secondary or redundant ISP seamless in the event that the primary ISP goes down, and for limiting heavy downloaders that may negatively impact the experience of other users."

"The tool's robust features allow for the customization of policies, objects, and firewall settings."

"Web Filtering and Application Filtering saves a lot of my bandwidth and improves the user's productivity."

"This solution is not accurate. Sometimes, the switches got hung. So sometimes, whatever policies we have deployed were not working properly."

"The product’s pricing has increased by approximately 45% in four months. This particular area needs improvement."

"Smaller CR15 units don’t have a hard disc or built in IView software. These units could do with that feature."

"SD-WAN should be included in the tool."

"The scalability needs work."

"The hardware has no user limit (the hardware is the limit) while the virtual edition has user limits (I do not like limits). It is a bit expensive, but totally worth the money."

"I don't know whether this will be included in an upgrade, but I would like to get the user utility, like seeing where the users are using more of the data."

"The product fails to provide proper reports, making it an area where improvements are required."

"It is not a scalable product. This is because if you want to increase the capacity of the solution, then you have to change the device."

"I consider Sophos Cyberoam UTM to be a competitively-priced product."

"We pay for licensing the solution. It's my understanding that it is not overly expensive. It may be somewhere around $2,000 for a license."

"It is a cheap firewall. We are not paying for any license."

"The product's pricing is a challenge."

"The solution's pricing is good since it is neither too high nor too low"

"Prices are very high."

"Sophos Cyberoam UTM needs cheaper pricing."

"Cost-wise, Sophos Cyberoam UTM is a good solution. Customers don't collapse upon hearing the price for it. My company pays for the license of Sophos Cyberoam UTM annually."