Seqrite UTM vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM comparison

"It has an MDM solution."

"The tool's robust features allow for the customization of policies, objects, and firewall settings."

"The solution's interface is user-friendly, and the web protection is good. The tool is highly stable. The product is scalable. The technical support is good. We chose Sophos Cyberoam UTM because their focus on security research is higher compared to other brands. It's an all-in-one solution with antivirus, EDR, wireless protection, and web protection integrated into one box. The initial setup was straightforward."

"The port forwarding is good."

"The VPN is excellent on the solution."

"I found that the best feature of Sophos Cyberoam UTM is reporting. Its reporting feature is excellent, fast, and easy to prep and launch."

"I like Sophos Cyberoam UTM as a security component or device for organizations. Performance-wise, it's a satisfactory solution, and it works okay. It also has good features."

"The solution works perfectly without any users."

"The product is easy to maintain."

"This solution is not accurate. Sometimes, the switches got hung. So sometimes, whatever policies we have deployed were not working properly."

"There is a lot or room for improvement, because it is still not a fourth or fifth generation firewall. It lacks security features."

"I have problems with the email filtering. Emails pass through without any filtering affecting them. When I get back to them and tell them this is the issue, they check everything and say it is not in their database signature and they have to update it. But you know, by that time, my user has already opened it."

"SD-WAN should be included in the tool."

"We have had some issues with technical support, which is an area that needs improvement."

"It should have a better VPN client. We decided to find something different than Cyberoam because of the VPN client software. It would be nice to have a user interface not only in English but also in different languages."

"Needs a mail alert/notification when the device loses any of its connections, during ISP redundancy implementation."

"The product fails to provide proper reports, making it an area where improvements are required."

"What needs improvement in Sophos Cyberoam UTM is openness in the competition among Sophos partners or any other Sophos product. Another area for improvement in the solution is pricing. It could be cheaper."

"It is worth the value."

"The solution comes with a yearly licensing fee."

"Cost-wise, Sophos Cyberoam UTM is a good solution. Customers don't collapse upon hearing the price for it. My company pays for the license of Sophos Cyberoam UTM annually."

"The solution’s pricing is average. The product is worth the money."

"The price is very competitive and the licensing is easy."

"The product has a very low price compared to other solutions."

"We paid for a two-year FullGuard license that includes support."

"Licensing is very good value for the money."