We performed a comparison between Seqrite UTM and Sophos Cyberoam UTM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sophos, Cisco, WatchGuard and others in Unified Threat Management (UTM)."It has an MDM solution."
"I find Sophos Cyberoam UTM very good. I like the feature of being able to block off Mac IDs that host users. For example, you have a Mac or Windows laptop and you created a hotspot. Other devices like mobiles and tablets e.g. iPads connected to that hotspot. We can block those devices that connected to the hotspot we created, only through Sophos. It's a good feature we didn't find in other UTMs."
"I found that the best feature of Sophos Cyberoam UTM is reporting. Its reporting feature is excellent, fast, and easy to prep and launch."
"We are using it as a security shield. It does not allow access before that in case we have restricted a few things from users, so it helps me in that."
"The best feature is the flexibility the product offers, in terms of remote access. What we had before was a decentralized mechanism in our organization, but after having this product we were able to get the remote locations into the same LAN. We were able to control the bandwidth and were able to take virtual access of those machines and give them the support, as and when required."
"We have never had to restart a firewall. The firewalls have all worked perfectly fine."
"The tool is stable."
"For a small-medium enterprise this solution is easy to manage and operate."
"The reporting features are very good."
"This solution is not accurate. Sometimes, the switches got hung. So sometimes, whatever policies we have deployed were not working properly."
"The setup is a bit complex, so we needed help from a consultant."
"Sophos Cyberoam UTM has room for improvement in specific rules-based objects and redesign. The solution also needs to improve in adding rules and policies, including renewing and finding policies."
"Technical support could be faster."
"It should have better VPN protection. Some of the VPN applications are not blocked by this firewall. Some VPNs are able to get through this firewall, which is why I am planning to replace this firewall with a good one in the near future."
"The solution could be cheaper."
"The solution's pricing could be a problem for some small businesses."
"While the security features are excellent, they could be improved."
"Sophos VPN connectivity could be improved, as it can be lengthy, and users take longer to connect"
Seqrite UTM is ranked 12th in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 1 review while Sophos Cyberoam UTM is ranked 7th in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 81 reviews. Seqrite UTM is rated 0.0, while Sophos Cyberoam UTM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Seqrite UTM writes "Discontinuation of Hardware and limited firewalling capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Cyberoam UTM writes "Stable and has a straightforward setup; reporting is fast and easy". Seqrite UTM is most compared with Sophos UTM, whereas Sophos Cyberoam UTM is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, Cisco Secure Firewall, Sophos UTM and Juniper SRX Series Firewall.
See our list of best Unified Threat Management (UTM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
