SAP Process Orchestration vs SWIFTnet FIN comparison

SAP and SWIFT are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. SAP is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while SWIFT is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. SAP holds a 8.0% mindshare in BBM, compared to SWIFT’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SWIFT users who would recommend it.

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 33 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

2,198 Views
941 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

SWIFTnet FIN

Read 2 SWIFTnet FIN reviews

626 Views
473 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

SWIFTnet FIN

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAP Process Orchestration and SWIFTnet FIN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP Process Orchestration vs. SWIFTnet FIN Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration vs. SWIFTnet FIN

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAP Process Orchestration

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SWIFTnet FIN

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of SAP Process Orchestration is 8.0%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SWIFTnet FIN is 5.0%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

Laxman Molugu

Chief Executive Officer at Saanvi systems inc

Enhances operational efficiency with valuable prepackaged content and cost-effective pricing

For organizations that operate within an SAP ecosystem, SAP Process Orchestration is recommended due to its cost-effectiveness and the availability of valuable prepackaged content. It is important to consider the needs of your industry, as SAP Process Orchestration may not meet all requirements in consumer-oriented sectors. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Read full review

Viktor Kelemen

SWIFT Administrator at OTP Bank Hungary

Reliability and support ensure secure financial messaging over decades

The most valuable feature of SWIFTnet FIN ( /products/swiftnet-fin-reviews ) is its reliability. For a bank, reliability is the most critical aspect. We also appreciate the extensive support facilities available worldwide. SWIFTnet FIN's services provide us with reliable connections to entities like European Central Bank, and we plan to join CLS as a direct member through SWIFTnet FIN. The store and forward feature, along with real-time messaging services, are crucial for our operations. Their security measures and compliance with CSP ( /products/threat-stack-cloud-security-platform-eol-reviews ) program ensure the highest safety standards. Audits and assessments by companies like KPMG and Ernst & Young further validate SWIFTnet FIN's reliability.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity."

"Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework."

"The standard adapter with EBA abilities is the most valuable feature. It has good process integration."

"The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced."

"With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"SAP Process Orchestration is middleware where we are able to manage and interact with everything from a single location. One of the most beneficial areas is monitoring which is very easy because it is all in one place. There are many adapters added recently that can be used for new functionality. The solution is easy to operate and it is more mature than the cloud solution provided by SAP."

"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are the standard APIs that we can use."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

"It provides the ability to interact with financial institutions and apply the same rules."

"The most valuable feature of SWIFTnet FIN is its reliability."

Cons

"SAP Process Orchestration breaks down sometimes."

"The solution could improve by making it more user-friendly by limiting the code required. We have to add some code in some cases where we need complex logic or some other functions. If this was able to be done in a more simplified manner then it would save a lot of effort and time."

"The solution is not very scalable because it is at the end of its life."

"It is scalable, but there can be performance issues with high data volume or traffic, especially during month ends."

"SAP needs to improve a lot in terms of the orchestration part so that more adapters can be provided to users, which are areas where the solution has downsides."

"It requires some maintenance."

"Its administration management feature needs to be simpler to use."

"The user interface of SAP Process Orchestration should be more modern to enhance its appeal. It can seem complicated and outdated to new users."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

"While SWIFTnet FIN is a robust system, there is room for minor improvements in scalability and installation complexity."

"I would like for them to work in real-time."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is highly-priced."

"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."

"There are fees in addition to the licensing."

"Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."

"The pricing for this solution is fine."

"Normally, you will have to choose CPU-based licensing...I rate the tool price a five out of ten."

"The fee for maintenance is costly."

"We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

56%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

The main concern is the cost. If additional help is needed due to lack of skill, we have to pay for SAP support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

There are two main areas for improvement: performance and cost. The cost is quite high, and if it were reduced, it might also improve the performance, potentially allowing us to access a more effic...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SWIFTnet FIN?

While SWIFTnet FIN is a robust system, there is room for minor improvements in scalability and installation complexity. Simplifying installation processes, especially for new users, could enhance i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SWIFTnet FIN?

We use SWIFTnet FIN ( /products/swiftnet-fin-reviews ) for almost everything, including international payments and sending files. It's essential for various financial messaging, such as file act, e...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SWIFTnet FIN?

Overall, SWIFTnet FIN is a highly reliable system with excellent support and security measures. While it's not perfect in scalability and installation, the system aligns well with our needs. I rate...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Data Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 14% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 12% of the time

Workato vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

SWIFT InterAct vs SWIFTnet FIN

Compared 100% of the time

More SWIFTnet FIN Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

April 2025

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

March 2025

Download SWIFTnet FIN product report

Also Known As

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

No data available

Overview

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

SAP

FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

FIN value-added processing includes:

Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
Message storage and retrieval.

It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

SWIFT

Sample Customers

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration vs. SWIFTnet FIN

April 2025

Free Report: SAP Process Orchestration vs. SWIFTnet FIN

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Process Orchestration vs. SWIFTnet FIN and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP Process Orchestration vs. SWIFTnet FIN report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.