SAP Process Orchestration vs SWIFTnet FIN comparison

SAP and SWIFT are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. SAP is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.8, while SWIFT is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. SAP holds a 5.7% mindshare in BBM, compared to SWIFT’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SWIFT users who would recommend it.

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 35 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

2,555 Views
971 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

SWIFTnet FIN

Read 2 SWIFTnet FIN reviews

579 Views
579 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

SWIFTnet FIN

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAP Process Orchestration and SWIFTnet FIN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP Process Orchestration vs. SWIFTnet FIN Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration vs. SWIFTnet FIN

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAP Process Orchestration

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SWIFTnet FIN

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of SAP Process Orchestration is 5.7%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SWIFTnet FIN is 4.5%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SAP Process Orchestration	5.7%
SWIFTnet FIN	4.5%
Other	89.8%

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

Vasanth Kumar Sabaapathi

Senior Lead Architect at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Simplified integrations bring flexibility and efficiency to diverse industries through comprehensive features and robust support

SAP is already trying to make improvements for SAP Process Orchestration by releasing updates every quarter, including patches and modules, and from a security standpoint, while it's a tightly coupled tool, they are introducing a lot of enhancements aligned with current market trends. There are standard contents readily available for starting integrations, which suit around 90% of every industry across verticals including pharma, manufacturing, and employee data central with SuccessFactors integration. Regarding functionality-wise improvements in SAP Process Orchestration, they are now incorporating the Salesforce system. Previously, we needed to rely on a third-party adapter for integration within SAP, but now they are building their own adapters to connect with Salesforce. Additionally, there are options like data connectors using Ariba coming up with SAP Process Orchestration. There's much more to explore, especially as they release new patches, enhancements, and adapters each quarter.

Read full review

Viktor Kelemen

Swift Administrator at OTP Bank Hungary

Reliability and support ensure secure financial messaging over decades

The most valuable feature of SWIFTnet FIN is its reliability. For a bank, reliability is the most critical aspect. We also appreciate the extensive support facilities available worldwide. SWIFTnet FIN's services provide us with reliable connections to entities like European Central Bank, and we plan to join CLS as a direct member through SWIFTnet FIN. The store and forward feature, along with real-time messaging services, are crucial for our operations. Their security measures and compliance with CSP program ensure the highest safety standards. Audits and assessments by companies like KPMG and Ernst & Young further validate SWIFTnet FIN's reliability.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In my opinion, SAP PO is the most mature suite of tools to integrate processes across SAP environments at this moment. It's really unbeatable because it allows you to integrate whatever scenarios you can imagine."

"The most valuable feature of SAP Process Orchestration is its flexibility in being able to build integrations with SAP systems and non-SAP systems."

"The performance of data processing has increased."

"SAP Process Orchestration is middleware where we are able to manage and interact with everything from a single location. One of the most beneficial areas is monitoring which is very easy because it is all in one place. There are many adapters added recently that can be used for new functionality. The solution is easy to operate and it is more mature than the cloud solution provided by SAP."

"The initial setup is easy...The solution gets automatically connected. The deployment takes six months. I rate its setup phase a ten out of ten."

"The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity."

"Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework."

"It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

"It provides the ability to interact with financial institutions and apply the same rules."

"The most valuable feature of SWIFTnet FIN is its reliability."

Cons

"In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them."

"I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible."

"The usability is an area where it can be improved upon."

"Its administration management feature needs to be simpler to use."

"The product roadmap suggests it will approach the end of support in several years, and a lot of innovations are now implemented by SAP not in SAP PO, but in SAP Integration Suite, hence, the platform is stable, but doesn't receive a lot of new features in recent updates."

"It's very difficult to find errors in a simple way."

"Process Orchestration doesn't provide authentication for data sent to us, meaning we have to rely on client certificate-based or basic authentication."

"It is not a scalable solution for the cloud. I would not recommend this for the cloud."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

"I would like for them to work in real-time."

"While SWIFTnet FIN is a robust system, there is room for minor improvements in scalability and installation complexity."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."

"My company deals with different pricing models of the product, according to which we don't pay for the solution directly, but we do pay for the maintenance part."

"It is a very expensive solution. We only pay for the license."

"There are fees in addition to the licensing."

"It's not an expensive solution."

"The pricing for this solution is fine."

"The solution is highly-priced."

"The fee for maintenance is costly."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

53%

Manufacturing Company

Non Tech Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	26

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

The price for SAP Process Orchestration is a little high when compared to market trends, which is just how the business is. I would rate it an eight.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

See all answers

What needs improvement with SWIFTnet FIN?

While SWIFTnet FIN is a robust system, there is room for minor improvements in scalability and installation complexity. Simplifying installation processes, especially for new users, could enhance i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SWIFTnet FIN?

We use SWIFTnet FIN ( /products/swiftnet-fin-reviews ) for almost everything, including international payments and sending files. It's essential for various financial messaging, such as file act, e...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SWIFTnet FIN?

Overall, SWIFTnet FIN is a highly reliable system with excellent support and security measures. While it's not perfect in scalability and installation, the system aligns well with our needs. I rate...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 11% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 8% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Data Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 6% of the time

IBM App Connect vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 6% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

SWIFT InterAct vs SWIFTnet FIN

Compared 45% of the time

Tieto Business Information eXchange vs SWIFTnet FIN

Compared 25% of the time

IBM B2B Cloud Services vs SWIFTnet FIN

Compared 11% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SWIFTnet FIN

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SWIFTnet FIN

Compared 9% of the time

More SWIFTnet FIN Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

January 2026

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

January 2026

Download SWIFTnet FIN product report

Also Known As

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

No data available

Overview

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

SAP

FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

FIN value-added processing includes:

Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
Message storage and retrieval.

It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

SWIFT

Sample Customers

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration vs. SWIFTnet FIN

December 2025

Free Report: SAP Process Orchestration vs. SWIFTnet FIN

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Process Orchestration vs. SWIFTnet FIN and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP Process Orchestration vs. SWIFTnet FIN report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.