Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

E2E Bridge vs SWIFTnet FIN comparison

Scheer and SWIFT are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. Scheer is ranked #22, while SWIFT is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Scheer holds a 0.5% mindshare in BBM, compared to SWIFT’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Scheer users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SWIFT users who would recommend it.
E2E Bridge
Read 2 E2E Bridge reviews
  • 36 Views
  • 24 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
SWIFTnet FIN
Read 2 SWIFTnet FIN reviews
  • 575 Views
  • 408 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between E2E Bridge and SWIFTnet FIN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed E2E Bridge vs. SWIFTnet FIN Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
E2E Bridge vs. SWIFTnet FIN
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

E2E Bridge
Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware
22nd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SWIFTnet FIN
Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of E2E Bridge is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SWIFTnet FIN is 4.5%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business-to-Business Middleware
 

Featured Reviews

it_user651531 - PeerSpot reviewer
You can build your model with a graphical interface using UML. Apart from some scripting, there is no coding.
An area of improvement is the stopping and starting of services from the Bridge server console. The only way to test services on the Bridge is to have them scheduled so that they run at a specific moment in time. It is, at this time, not possible to trigger this by hand from the console. It is possible to trigger it via the analyze tool, which is used to trace the service. It would be nice to have a simple way to test services without having to schedule them. This is no problem for a developer, but from the functional consultant point of view, the functional consultant needs to test the service and determine if it meets the requirements. It's not a big issue, but it would be nice to have.
Read full review
VK
Reliability and support ensure secure financial messaging over decades
The most valuable feature of SWIFTnet FIN ( /products/swiftnet-fin-reviews ) is its reliability. For a bank, reliability is the most critical aspect. We also appreciate the extensive support facilities available worldwide. SWIFTnet FIN's services provide us with reliable connections to entities like European Central Bank, and we plan to join CLS as a direct member through SWIFTnet FIN. The store and forward feature, along with real-time messaging services, are crucial for our operations. Their security measures and compliance with CSP ( /products/threat-stack-cloud-security-platform-eol-reviews ) program ensure the highest safety standards. Audits and assessments by companies like KPMG and Ernst & Young further validate SWIFTnet FIN's reliability.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
55%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Computer Software Company
5%
Retailer
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with SWIFTnet FIN?
While SWIFTnet FIN is a robust system, there is room for minor improvements in scalability and installation complexity. Simplifying installation processes, especially for new users, could enhance i...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for SWIFTnet FIN?
We use SWIFTnet FIN ( /products/swiftnet-fin-reviews ) for almost everything, including international payments and sending files. It's essential for various financial messaging, such as file act, e...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering SWIFTnet FIN?
Overall, SWIFTnet FIN is a highly reliable system with excellent support and security measures. While it's not perfect in scalability and installation, the system aligns well with our needs. I rate...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

iWay EIM Suite vs E2E Bridge Logo
iWay EIM Suite vs E2E Bridge
Compared 100% of the time
More E2E Bridge Competitors
SWIFT InterAct vs SWIFTnet FIN Logo
SWIFT InterAct vs SWIFTnet FIN
Compared 100% of the time
More SWIFTnet FIN Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
June 2025
E2E Bridge reportDownload E2E Bridge product report
Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
June 2025
SWIFTnet FIN reportDownload SWIFTnet FIN product report
 

Overview

The E2E Bridge is the first "business" middleware. It facilitates rapid process and systems integration by helping technical and non-technical stakeholders to communicate effectively.
Scheer

FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

FIN value-added processing includes:

  • Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
  • Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
  • Message storage and retrieval.

It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

SWIFT
 

Sample Customers

Agri Retail, dodenhof, PKZ, Nikon, Ypsomed, EVN, Landwirtschaftsverlag Mªnster, Intrum Justitia, UBS, B2BNet, Ammann, Antalis, Apareoo, Coutts, Franke, Swissgrid, UPC Cablecom, Vontobel
Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo
Buyer's Guide
E2E Bridge vs. SWIFTnet FIN
June 2025
Free Report: E2E Bridge vs. SWIFTnet FIN
Find out what your peers are saying about E2E Bridge vs. SWIFTnet FIN and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our E2E Bridge vs. SWIFTnet FIN report.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.