We performed a comparison between RiskSense and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable Network Security, Qualys, Morphisec and others in Vulnerability Management."Out of all the features, the one item that has been most valuable is the fact that Wiz puts into context all the pieces that create an issue, and applies a particular risk evaluation that helps us prioritize when we need to address a misconfiguration, vulnerability, or any issue that would put our environment into risk."
"Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it."
"The initial setup is not complex."
"They are on a good trajectory as a company and investing in R&D in the right ways."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"The initial setup is mostly straightforward."
"The initial setup is straightforward so long as your infrastructure, components, and networks are in place."
"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."
"The vulnerability scanning is the most important aspect of the solution for us."
"There is no burden of updating or upgrading this solution."
"We wish there were a way, beyond providing visibility and automated remediation, to wait on a given remediation, due to a critical aspect, such as the cost associated with a particular upgrade... We would like to see preventive controls that can be applied through Wiz to protect against vulnerabilities that we're not going to be able to remediate immediately."
"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."
"The price could be lower."
"I'd like to see them improve their support."
"The one drawback that we have found is the reports."
"We'd like to see a bit more user-friendliness."
"The pricing of the solution could be more reasonable."
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management could be improved with an increased number of dashboards and MSSP integration."
"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."
"It can have more integration."
More Tenable.io Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
RiskSense is ranked 19th in Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is ranked 4th in Vulnerability Management with 13 reviews. RiskSense is rated 9.0, while Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of RiskSense writes "Useful for vulnerability management with many integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management writes "Very mature and quite stable but could use a better user interface". RiskSense is most compared with Tenable.sc, Kenna.VM, Rapid7 InsightVM, Qualys VM and Tenable Nessus, whereas Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable.sc, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Qualys VM and Snyk.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
