Red Canary and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform are cybersecurity products. Based on data, users appreciate Red Canary's pricing and customer support, while ThreatLocker's advanced features make it a preferred choice for robust security solutions.
Features: Red Canary provides advanced threat detection, real-time monitoring, and automation for response actions. ThreatLocker focuses on zero trust with application control, allowlisting, and elevation control for secure access. Its application control and ringfencing technology emphasize comprehensive security measures.
Room for Improvement: Red Canary could enhance its feature sets to match ThreatLocker's complexity. ThreatLocker's setup complexity and initial configuration process could be streamlined to reduce challenges faced during deployment. Improving integration flexibility with existing tools can further enhance both solutions.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Canary is known for simple integration and strong customer support, which aids rapid deployment. ThreatLocker's deployment is more complex due to its robust security configuration. Both offer responsive customer support, but ThreatLocker's initial setup requires greater effort.
Pricing and ROI: Red Canary has a straightforward pricing model focused on quick ROI, suitable for cost-sensitive organizations. ThreatLocker entails higher initial costs due to its comprehensive security model, which promises long-term ROI through enhanced protection.
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
Based on what we use ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform for with the same functionalities and packaging, it was around 13 or 14 hours.
We have the MDR package as well, and just knowing someone is watching those endpoints at 3:00 a.m. is a lifesaver that you cannot put a dollar figure on.
In emergencies, there is an on-call person available to resolve issues immediately.
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Their support is world-class.
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform scales very smoothly with our growing needs.
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
Red Canary's pricing spectrum may not be ideal for smaller financial institutions.
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform could improve by being a little more hands-off, perhaps by having a team inside ThreatLocker that does all the vetting of patches; having one person hired by ThreatLocker to check out patches means that a million other industries using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform do not have to vet the same patch, ultimately saving time and money around the world.
This feedback would help us understand what is learned in real-time, especially during a one-hour learning mode setup, ensuring we remain aware of potentially unnecessary learned items.
The services are higher priced.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
Money is saved because it is not costly, and I would suggest it for other companies.
Red Canary detects threats and attack patterns, allowing us to assess any significant damage caused to the banking environment, particularly if protected data has been damaged or corrupted.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
It protects our customers.
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform | 2.6% |
| Red Canary | 1.9% |
| Other | 95.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 51 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Red Canary Managed Detection and Response (MDR) offers robust threat detection, rapid response capabilities, continuous security monitoring, and seamless integration with existing tools. Valued for its actionable reporting and proactive threat intelligence, it streamlines operations and enhances organizational efficiency and security.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform employs a deny-by-default approach to enhance security and operational efficiency, focusing on precise application control and streamlined access management without administrative rights.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform offers advanced application control, allowlisting, and elevation control, significantly reducing unauthorized software activities. Its granular controls improve security, while ringfencing enhances application monitoring. Elevation requests allow users to gain administrative access without IT intervention. The platform's ease of policy management and real-time threat visibility contribute to reduced help desk tickets and operational costs, ensuring protection against ransomware and unauthorized applications.
What are the key features of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform?Organizations often deploy ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform for ensuring endpoint security in industries requiring stringent application control and administrative access management. Its functionalities are critical for managing Shadow IT, creating policies, and overseeing software installation approvals. Common usage spans sectors demanding robust security and compliance, such as finance and healthcare, where maintaining high security and efficiency is crucial.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
