No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Rapid7 InsightVM vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Rapid7 InsightVM
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
66
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (12th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (5th)
SentinelOne Singularity Hol...
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2775840 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Manages vulnerabilities effectively over time but needs improvement in web coverage and dashboard flexibility
Most of the dynamic asset tagging we use is manual, not dynamic. To manage the assets, we employed the manual approach because we have a limitation regarding the license, so we don't use the dynamic approach much. I don't know how the configuration assessment has assisted with meeting compliance standards. The product that we use is the on-premise solution where we configure assets and dynamically scan them. However, we use the default policies more, the template, so Rapid7 InsightVM on-premise version is not that effective in the web-related systems. However, it is best on the OS to identify and discover the OS-related vulnerabilities, more of open ports and the discovery of vulnerable ports or services. It would be better to improve Rapid7 InsightVM by including or working better to add web-related templates because it's not that effective in regard to web. I don't know if they may have a separate product regarding the web, but for the on-premise type, they are not strong in this area. I would prefer to see web-related templates in addition to improving the dashboard-related things because the dashboard has been constant for a very long time. It would be better to see various kinds of, perhaps a flexible type of dashboard. If it's not customizable at all, I would want to see the risk and asset over time with more flexibility. The current dashboard is not flexible in this regard; I have to dig down every day, so they should work on this as well, in addition to the web.
Graham Peck - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Security Manager at Leeds United FC
Lockdown devices and ports on endpoints so that you can stop propagation of any virus if it's detected but performance utilization can be better
It's scalable in the form of it now covers mobile devices as well as a number of other different types of devices, not just Windows. Also, there's no limit as to how many devices you can install it on. We plan to expand the number of devices/users as we get more people onboard or upgrade to more mobile devices; we will then increase the number of licenses for mobile devices. We've got 450 licenses, but we've got about 375 devices and users currently. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. There's not a product yet that I've found that I can't put it on, especially now that they've got the new release, which was the mobile agents.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most important aspect of the solution is that it rarely gives false positives, especially compared to other products. It provides very clear reports for our IT teams to look at."
"Rapid 7 is a leading solution that has been implemented in many companies."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the agent and the scanning."
"We can create our own templates."
"The solution scales well."
"The ease of deployment and configuration allows users to onboard quickly."
"We feel the interface is very good. It is very easy to use, even a nontechnical person can use it."
"The discovery and prioritization of vulnerabilities."
"The automated response capability in SentinelOne enhances security operations. It means I don't have to worry about having too many security people watching it because you can automate a lot of the tasks."
 

Cons

"The solution should include a tighter integration with third-party threat modeling and threat intelligence tools."
"They should integrate the solution with multiple products."
"Some of our customers want to be completely cloud based, and Rapid7 doesn't offer this as an option."
"We have some issues with how it scans patches."
"Within InsightVM, there is no feature to assign a ticket. If we can have more API calls, we can do that from InsightVM."
"It gives false positives at times, and this a problem. It causes problems with reporting."
"Technical support does not respond quickly."
"The InsightVM cannot scan if we connect to our customer by the VPN."
"The performance utilization on the device that it's monitoring. This aspect needs improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is expensive, but it's fine for us as we have an open budget for security solutions. Protection and having the system secured is more important."
"The price of the solution is less than the competitors."
"The solution is a bit more reasonably priced than other products."
"Our licensing costs are somewhere around $40,000 annually. There are no additional fees."
"The licensing is asset-based and very straightforward."
"I do not have experience with the pricing of the solution."
"Its pricing depends on the number of users per month."
"The tool's price is neither too high nor too low. My company needs to pay 65,000 per year. There are no additional costs apart from the licensing fees attached to the solution."
"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten; one is very expensive, and ten is an absolutely cheap product."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
896,387 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Construction Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business29
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise25
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Nessus?
You have full visibility across cloud, network, virtual, and containerized infrastructures with Rapid7 Insight VM. You can easily prioritize vulnerabilities using attacker analytics. Overall, Rapid...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 InsightVM?
My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that both the setup cost and licensing are great.
What needs improvement with Rapid7 InsightVM?
To improve Rapid7 InsightVM, I wish to have integration with patching systems, which would be useful to us. The usability of Rapid7 InsightVM is excellent, and the reporting module is one of the mo...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SentinelOne Singularity Hologram?
It's obviously increased my cost when it comes to security management because I didn't have it before, and it isn't the cheapest one on the market. But at the same time, it has brought down my cybe...
What needs improvement with SentinelOne Singularity Hologram?
The performance utilization on the device that it's monitoring. This aspect needs improvement.
What advice do you have for others considering SentinelOne Singularity Hologram?
Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. I won't give it a ten. I've seen some others that I may next time decide to go with rather than SentinelOne.
 

Also Known As

InsightVM, NeXpose
Attivo Networks
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ACS, Acosta, AllianceData, amazon.com, biogen idec, CBRE, CATERPILLAR, Deloitte, COACH, GameStop, IBM
NSS Labs., Fierce IT security, FireEye
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Horizon3.ai, Tenable and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: May 2026.
896,387 professionals have used our research since 2012.