We performed a comparison between Qualys VMDR and SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The reporting functionality is great."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable features are vulnerability detection and the scanning capability to enable identification of vulnerabilities across our network."
"I like Qualys because it is a very complete product, more so than Tenable."
"The solution shows us classic categories, including high, medium, and low risks. It also shows critical items, and that gives us the advantage of prioritizing things."
"The prioritization feature is great. I think it has all of the advanced features that we need."
"It's really beneficial for scanning and interacting with the agent."
"I find Qualys VM very robust, and it's very useful for vulnerability management and patch management. The value that it brings to my environment is economies of scale. There is no limitation on adding any endpoints. You go by the rule, and it's added once another endpoint is added to our environment. It's automatically installed, and it's less work from our end. It frees up my license automatically if I don't need an endpoint or if my machine is decommissioned. I like the dashboard displays because I don't see any duplication. The most important part is vulnerability management and prioritization. Unlike Symantec, it shows the kind of vulnerability I would want to patch first. It provides a holistic view of the kind of vulnerabilities and the ones I should remediate first. I don't have to do a scan; it just brings up those critical kinds of vulnerabilities like zero-day vulnerabilities and tells me to prioritize them. You have to prioritize these vulnerabilities first and go on with the rest. The dashboard shows me the ones that have been fixed, so I don't have to complete an aging report. The user experience and the graphical interface are good. As it's user-friendly and understandable on an executive level, it brings real value. We also use this solution because it's robust and flexibile."
"Although it is, in fact, a complete vulnerability management solution, the most valuable feature is the patch management functionality. Most of our customers give preference to this tool over other tools when it comes to patch management."
"Qualys VM should improve its methodology."
"Improve the user interface."
"There seems to be a lack of easy onboarding into Qualys."
"The customer support is very bad."
"Qualys should improve their customer experience. They need to improve the tech support experience and the turnaround time."
"They have integrated with other third parties, but it is still not viable."
"Finding things in management can be quite difficult."
"Make some minimal dashboard improvements."
"SanerNow has good integration with the more well known ITSM tools, but at the same time there are many other ITSM (IT Service Management) tools available in the market, including local tools here in India, and I'm not sure how SanerNow plans to integrate with them all out of the box."
More SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews while SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is ranked 6th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform writes "Advanced vulnerability Management solution with out-of-the-box integrations". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management, whereas SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, BigFix and NinjaOne.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.