We performed a comparison between Prometheus and VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Prometheus stands out for its wide array of APIs and libraries, giving users a broad scope of options. Meanwhile, VMware Tanzu excels in its straightforward deployment process and seamless integration with other solutions. Prometheus offers adaptability and the ability to tailor to specific needs, whereas Tanzu guarantees the ability to handle growth, reliability, and robust technical assistance.
Users of Prometheus have identified areas for improvement in areas such as the language used for queries, the setup process, the DSL and analysis tools, customization and visualization features, stability, and documentation. Users of VMware Tanzu have requested enhancements in cost predictability, ease of redeployment, customizable dashboards, documentation, and the setup process.
Service and Support: Prometheus depends on available resources and a thriving online community for assistance, whereas VMware Tanzu has received varied feedback regarding its customer service. Certain users have reported satisfactory encounters, while others have encountered difficulties with support.
Ease of Deployment: Some users found the setup for Prometheus to be straightforward, while others faced a learning curve. The deployment time for Prometheus can range from one hour to days or even weeks. In contrast, reviewers had mixed opinions about the setup process for VMware Tanzu. Some found it to be easy and quick, while others found it complex, especially when setting up clusters.
Pricing: Prometheus is a budget-friendly choice with no setup cost or licensing fees, while VMware Tanzu can be pricey due to high licensing costs and additional expenses for integrations and add-ons. In terms of setup cost, Prometheus is a more cost-effective option compared to VMware Tanzu Observability.
Comparison Results: Based on user feedback, Prometheus emerges as the preferred choice when compared to VMware Tanzu. Users appreciate Prometheus for its wide range of APIs and libraries, its ability to seamlessly integrate with various programming languages and operators, and its valuable dashboard for log collection and comparison. Additionally, Prometheus is commended for its scalability and customization capabilities.
"The most valuable feature of Prometheus is its ability to collect metrics."
"Prometheus is an open-source product that helps mold and improve it per our requirements. It is a lightweight solution that gives you many different metrics you can use in your application. The product offers complete granularity of your infrastructure. It integrates seamlessly with other tools like Grafana, which offers dashboard visibility. Prometheus is an extensively used product. I haven't seen any organization that is not using it."
"The sky is the limit because the solution is a flexible open box that can be used vastly to do anything you need to monitor applications."
"Prometheus is a great solution for monitoring."
"The solution can be deployed in thirty minutes."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It is a scalable solution."
"It has lots of APIs and libraries to integrate with any kind of language."
"VMware comes with a support team, and if you have trouble, you can easily create a ticket, and VMware will help you. Therefore, the best aspect is the support."
"For us, the ease of deployment in combination with TMZ was the most important part because we don't have to manually deploy a complex monitoring solution. We can more or less do that with the click of a button, and we are not dependent on the developers to provide us with all the necessary features and functions to make that work. We can just deploy it on a workload cluster and monitor at least a good part of the workload. If we want to go into detail, we clearly need to make changes, but for a good part of application monitoring, it gives us good insights."
"This solution allows me to have true visibility for any metrics when it comes to my cloud, and private."
"People are very pleased with the implementation."
"The features I find most valuable is the querying and alerting capabilities."
"Tanzu itself, integrated with multiple solutions, bestows support and security upon a container platform, especially when it comes to managing open-source container platforms such as Kubernetes."
"The solution is great for virtualization and preparing the infrastructure in Tanzu to test products. It's very fast and has good visibility."
"No issues with stability."
"The product must improve its documentation."
"They could provide efficient logs in terms of clarity and ease of access similar to Datadog’s paid version."
"I would like to see improvement in the analysis tools and customization features."
"There is a need for a more comprehensive overview of exporters, especially when dealing with many of them."
"One potential area for improvement would be fixing the occasional glitches and bugs."
"Prometheus' UI color can improve. Using the Prometheus UI for configuration or analyzing queries is a horrible experience."
"Setting up the rules in Prometheus can be confusing, making it an area where improvements are required."
"Lacks the ability to clusterize."
"In the new version, I would love to see more prediction capabilities. It would be great if one could see the alerts get a little more enriched with information and become more human-friendly instead of the technical stuff that they put in there. I think those would be really awesome outcomes to get."
"The documentation and integration with Kubernetes could be improved."
"The initial setup should be easier and more seamless."
"Its billing model is consumption-based. I understand the consumption-based model, but it is not necessarily easy to estimate and guess how many points or how much we are going to consume on a specific application up until we get to that point. So, for us, it would be helpful to have more insights or predictability into what we can expect from a cost perspective if we are starting to use specific features. This can potentially also drive our consumption a bit more."
"They could make it more easy to plug-in data so that a nontechnical person will be able to use it, like accountants or finance people. That way they don't have to ask us."
"The main problem I have is that the license cost is very high."
"The implementation is a long process that should be improved."
"I would like to see integration with Kubernetes cluster and APIs so that you can manage the entire stack."
More VMware Aria Operations for Applications Pricing and Cost Advice →
Prometheus is ranked 9th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 32 reviews while VMware Aria Operations for Applications is ranked 32nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 9 reviews. Prometheus is rated 8.4, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Prometheus writes "A very flexible open box that can be used vastly to do anything you need". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Aria Operations for Applications writes "Easy to deploy, worth the money, and helpful for uptime monitoring and performance insights". Prometheus is most compared with Azure Monitor, New Relic, Dynatrace, Sentry and ManageEngine Applications Manager, whereas VMware Aria Operations for Applications is most compared with Grafana, Dynatrace, Datadog, Zabbix and AppDynamics. See our Prometheus vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
