PractiTest vs QMetry Test Management comparison

PractiTest and QMetry are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. PractiTest is ranked #17, while QMetry is ranked #14 with an average rating of 6.0. PractiTest holds a 3.0% mindshare in TMT, compared to QMetry’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of PractiTest users are willing to recommend the solution.

PractiTest

Read 7 PractiTest reviews

723 Views
405 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QMetry Test Management

Read 1 QMetry Test Management review

364 Views
357 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

PractiTest

QMetry Test Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between PractiTest and QMetry Test Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,667 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PractiTest

Ranking in Test Management Tools

17th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (22nd)

QMetry Test Management

Ranking in Test Management Tools

14th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of PractiTest is 3.0%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QMetry Test Management is 2.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
QMetry Test Management	2.0%
PractiTest	3.0%
Other	95.0%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Dave Carter

Test Team Lead at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat

It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for different projects. As an example, if you connect PractiTest to Jira for one project, that's the one you have to use for all projects. We had a requirement to connect with Jira for one project, and a different tool for another, project but it was unable to accommodate that unfortunately. I would therefore like to see it easier to integrate with bug tracking tools at project level which would give each project the opportunity to use a different bug tracker if required.

Read full review

VinayKumar17

Team Lead at Graebert India

Helped with agile testing, provides exploratory testing and screen capture capabilities but visibility of test cases could be improved

QMetry has different aspects. It provides exploratory testing and screen capture capabilities while running tests. It has a recorder integrated. If you run a test on an application, it will record every aspect of it. For example, if you execute a user scenario, it will record what the user does within the application and generate a script. This can also be used for quick automation. Moreover, if we have an automation framework, QMetry can integrate with it. QMetry can also handle load testing in web-based applications. We have integrated it with a bug-tracking system, but not for automation. It was not difficult to integrate it. This integration was mainly for reporting purposes, such as creating reports directly from QMetry.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

"Helped organise the manual test cases so they were documented correctly, which was invaluable as it allowed for reviewing and improving of test scripts so they could be followed by a number of different people which helped with resourcing."

"Since we started using this product, our organization's testing functionality has really improved."

"This is a good solution for a global transnational company."

"In addition, we found PractiTest very user-friendly and customizable."

"Technical support of PractiTest is awesome. They are always ready to help in any time zone, which makes them stand out from others."

"PractiTest gives us the opportunity to control the testing process efficiently and saves us a lot of time that we had to spend while using other tools."

"Converting a couple of these test plans into PractiTest was amazing and made a world of difference."

"The best benefit was for new hires. We used to write our test cases in simple English within QMetry, so anyone who knew English could understand them. This helped with training new hires."

Cons

"Needs to improve adding the ability to run tests multiple times and setting different parameters."

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time."

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

"PractiTest practically requires a lot of sandboxing, demos with their team, and online tutorials."

"It does not offer server installation, only software as a service."

"Yes, there are times when server is very slow in response."

"There are some features that I would like added: an option to export a part of tests with steps."

"For me, the visibility could be improved. When executing a test case, you needed to open it separately to read the steps."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

"QMetry was cheaper than Xray, which was based on the number of users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

10%

Construction Company

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	1

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QMetry Test Management?

QMetry was cheaper than Xray, which was based on the number of users. It was around $10d per user, while QMetry was closer to $4 per user. So it's about half the price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QMetry Test Management?

QMetry team upgrade features based on the number of users experiencing certain problems. If fewer users encounter an issue, they may not address it. They have a different concept where feature deve...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for QMetry Test Management?

We use it for test case management. We used it to define valid and invalid inputs and to create tests for both scenarios. This involved manual testing, such as boundary value analysis and exceeding...

See all answers

Comparisons

TFS vs PractiTest

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest

Compared 10% of the time

Parasoft Development Testing Platform vs PractiTest

Compared 9% of the time

Jira vs PractiTest

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest

Compared 8% of the time

More PractiTest Competitors

TestRail vs QMetry Test Management

Compared 24% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs QMetry Test Management

Compared 22% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs QMetry Test Management

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs QMetry Test Management

Compared 13% of the time

Sealights vs QMetry Test Management

Compared 13% of the time

More QMetry Test Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

March 2026

Download PractiTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

March 2026

Download QMetry Test Management product report

Overview

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing.

Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
Release your products with confidence and control.

PractiTest

QMetry is a suite of most comprehensive test management products to provide agile testing teams innovative technology platforms to deploy better Quality Software faster with confidence. It has more than 20 integrations. QMetry brand is trusted by 400+ customers globally across many industries including Finance, Healthcare Services, Travel & Hospitality, Retail, Education and High Technology.

QMetry

Sample Customers

Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman

Healthland, Stanford University, Solid Fire, Proteus, Epocrates, Cognifide, Exo, Holmes Corporation, Global Communication, University of Sydney

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.