No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Pivot3 vs VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Pivot3
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
HCI (26th)
VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL]
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1124199 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior IT Manager at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Stable, good technical support, and the the visual encoding works well
The most valuable feature is the visual encoding I would like to see better video compression. Snapshot notification would be a good addition. The price of this solution is high compared to the competitors, so it should be lowered. I have been using Pivot3 for between four and five years. This…
it_user335727 - PeerSpot reviewer
Deputy Director of Information Technologies at County of El Dorado, California
We've just gotten started with it. We've seen that the single interface makes it easy to manage and the expandability makes it flexible for us.
Well we've just gotten started with it so it's hard to say. What we have seen as benefits but I think that going forward, I think that the expandability is going to be absolutely crucial for us. Eventually we want to make our disaster recovery site into more of just a barebones continuity facility. We'd like to really kind of have a, full data center there that we can replicate everything and the EVO:RAIL is just I think a great way for us to get started on that path. Combination of the VMware, SRM and vSphere, makes it very manageable. I think that we're again looking forward to exploring more of the capabilities, of the box itself. It's established a kind of a really strong base for us going forward as our clients’ needs change, as our IT infrastructure requirements change, this is going to be kind of a basis for us going forward. It is easy to manage because we have a single sort of interface to it being just a hyper-converged, box I guess the real advantage would be having a single interface to manage the box.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It greatly streamlined the time it took to scale out the enterprise and it completely eliminated the need for a SAN/Storage engineer, with the simplicity the Pivot3 Stack Manager brought with it for managing storage."
"The most valuable feature is the visual encoding."
"The technical support is very good."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of implementation."
"One feature we found useful was the product's complete ability to integrate with vCenter."
"My view on EVO:RAIL has always been that it is a nice piece of technology, but it is way too expensive with a deeply flawed licensing model."
"I have put together some of my own notes from the demo and it looks like a great product with a comprehensive feature set right at launch time."
"Support was excellent, and this is key when I'm selecting new vendors."
"Technical support for EVO:RAIL has been awesome."
"Using the VSA is allowing vendors to offer deduplication, compression, backup and replication among other services."
"For sure this could awesome for customers that need to build new infrastructure and potentially could be valuable for the SMB and the Mid-size."
"EVO: RAIL Management revolutionizes management computer with live monitoring of the health of the CPU, memory, storage and use of virtual machines to complete clusters EVO: RAIL, individual appliances and individual nodes."
"I really like what VMware is doing with their Software-Defined Data Centre strategy – the idea of allowing customers to use commoditised low cost compute, storage and networking hardware for their infrastructure has got to be a good thing – we are on the verge of hopefully making IT both much simpler and cheaper."
 

Cons

"The price of this solution is high compared to the competitors, so it should be lowered."
"One of the biggest problems with HCI vendors was the lack of flexibility for adding resources."
"In the next release, I would like to see compatibility and support for critical applications, like SAP."
"Snapshot notification would be a good addition."
"Marketing needs improvement."
"So for me EVO:RAIL just does not make sense, not from a technical point of view, but commercially."
"Flexibility is probably the biggest constraint for customers – it’s a ‘fixed’ appliance and there’s limited scope for change."
"They are already addressing this, but it could be better in terms of licensing and overall costs."
"The only limit that I see is potentially the cost: the vSphere edition will be the Enterprise Plus one, where the cost is not so much SMB friendly!"
"But note that EVO:RAIL remain still with vSphere 5.5… and not on vSphere 6.0!"
"It wasn’t scalable enough for our needs – could be more scalable to add more VM clusters."
"VMware EVO:RAIL only support VMware while Nutanix support KVM or Hyper-V over VMware."
"Even though VMware had a great chance to really make things so much better they have wasted the opportunity – amazingly they are still forcing you to use Enterprise Plus whereas Essentials Plus would be more appropriate in most cases."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our fees are approximately $100,000 yearly."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which HCI solutions are best for your needs.
904,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user244362 - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Consultant with 51-200 employees
Aug 30, 2015
Nutanix vs. VMware EVO:RAIL vs. FlexPod
Originally posted at www.storagegaga.com/dont-get-too-drunk-on-hyper-converged/ I hate the fact that I am bursting the big bubble brewing about Hyper Convergence (HC). I urge all to look past the hot air and hype frenzy that are going on, because in the end, the HC platforms have to be aligned…
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
EVO:RAIL
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

SNHMC, HPD Software, The Hurlingham Club, NHS, Rochester Police Department, The Doe Run Company, 101 Casino, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport
ASAHI INTERACTIVE, Fukuoka-Hibiki Shinkin Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Nutanix, Broadcom and others in HCI. Updated: June 2026.
904,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.