Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Parascript FormXtra.AI vs Tungsten TotalAgility comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Parascript FormXtra.AI
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
23rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tungsten TotalAgility
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2024, in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category, the mindshare of Parascript FormXtra.AI is 0.7%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tungsten TotalAgility is 9.7%, up from 8.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Parascript FormXtra.AI?
Share your opinion
PrashanthR - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 1, 2022
Great with recognition and provides a high level of confidence in terms of extraction capabilities
When it comes to machine print, this is an excellent solution with features you don't find in other tools. When dealing with handwritten text they have provided some A2iA locators that require a separate license. Even after implementing that, the handwritten text extraction was not great. Microsoft Azure does better at text extraction. If an organization is looking for OCR without the need to extract anything, then I would suggest a product such as Textract or another free software. If data extraction is needed for additional processes then I would recommend Kofax. I rate this solution eight out of 10

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The licensing cost for Kofax TotalAgility is very expensive, though I'm unable to give you the range, the sales representatives of my company say that the product is quite expensive."
"It is slightly more expensive than other tools."
"Kofax TotalAgility is very expensive."
"The price of this solution is less than some of the competition."
"It has a perpetual license. You pay once in a lifetime for the volume of scans you will do and the number of users you will have. You can have participants or regular users, and you can have developers and administrators. So, once you purchase it, it is for a lifetime, and then every year, you have to pay for the maintenance. There is an annual maintenance cost, which is about 18% of the licensing cost."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions are best for your needs.
812,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Kofax TotalAgility?
The product is really good, and it is easy to use. It comes with multiple integrations. The solution keeps up with the trend of Microsoft Copilot and AI.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kofax TotalAgility?
The price of this solution is less than some of the competition.
What needs improvement with Kofax TotalAgility?
The product's console version is old. It should also improve its forum.
 

Also Known As

FormXtra.AI
Kofax TotalAgility, TotalAgility, Singularity IDP, Capture Enabled BPM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IBM, Hp, BancTec, Siemens, Philips
AETNA, American Express, BNP Paribas, Citi, CommerzBank, Dexia, GoldmanSachs, HSBC, ING, JP Morgan, Raymond James
Find out what your peers are saying about ABBYY, UiPath, Automation Anywhere and others in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP). Updated: September 2024.
812,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.