

Parasoft SOAtest and Panaya Test Dynamix compete in the field of testing solutions. Parasoft SOAtest has a technical edge with its strong integration capabilities, suitable for complex environments, while Panaya Test Dynamix's intuitive interface and advanced analytics favor those new to testing automation.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest provides advanced integration with a variety of platforms, extensive automation capabilities, and support for a range of protocols. Panaya Test Dynamix features strong analytics, user-friendly dashboards, and the ability to efficiently manage a large volume of tests.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance its user interface to improve accessibility for users less experienced with integration-heavy environments and simplify initial setup processes. Panaya Test Dynamix might improve by expanding integration options with other enterprise tools, enhancing support for complex test scenarios, and offering more advanced customization options in analytics.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest requires more initial configuration, which is beneficial for environments with custom requirements, and offers robust customer support. Panaya Test Dynamix simplifies deployment with straightforward processes and provides efficient customer support for rapid initial setup.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest involves a higher upfront cost, justified by long-term returns from its extensive capabilities. Panaya Test Dynamix offers competitive pricing, appealing to smaller teams looking for quick ROI through rapid deployment and efficient analytics.
Tasks that previously took four or five minutes can now be completed in 20 to 30 seconds with the help of the tool.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it.
In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
The best feature of Parasoft SOAtest is the extension tool where we can write our custom scripts.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Parasoft SOAtest | 1.1% |
| Panaya Test Dynamix | 1.7% |
| Other | 97.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.
With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.