Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs Threat Hunting Framework comparison

Palo Alto Networks and Group-IB are both solutions in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #20 with an average rating of 6.0, while Group-IB is ranked #39. Palo Alto Networks holds a 1.2% mindshare in TIPT, compared to Group-IB’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Group-IB users who would recommend it.
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Read 7 Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus reviews
  • 1,260 Views
  • 1,058 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
Threat Hunting Framework
Read 1 Threat Hunting Framework review
  • 291 Views
  • 279 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and Threat Hunting Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Recorded Future, VirusTotal and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Threat Intelligence Platforms Report (Updated: August 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
August 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
20th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Threat Hunting Framework
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
39th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Threat Hunting Framework is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Threat Intelligence Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus1.2%
Threat Hunting Framework0.9%
Other97.9%
Threat Intelligence Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

RichPhillips - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a centralized dashboard for reporting threats and anomalies
The tool along with other suite of products provides us with threat and alert information.  The solution has provided us with a centralized dashboard for reporting threats and anomalies.  I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.  I…
Read full review
JR
High fidelity cyber incident detection is near in real-time, enabling proactive & timely mitigation efforts
The nature of the system means it has to be implemented throughout the organizations. You need to implement it on the network layer, the email layer, the web proxy layer, and also the endpoints. Nevertheless, endpoint monitoring is very challenging due to the lack of automated method to install the endpoint agents. In one of our customer case, we have about 40,000 endpoints and we need to have a simplified method of deployment if we're going to implement the endpoint monitoring effectively. Product features also need some improvement in creating custom signatures for detection because that is not open to customers.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus has had a positive impact on my company as we can reduce the cost for the SOC investment, and we can also get good feedback on how to strengthen our network from the expertise people available."
"I would rate Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security."
"The feature that I like best is the dashboard."
"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."
"The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic."
"Great automatic correlation of all internal activities."
 

Cons

"I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate."
"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."
"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."
"It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."
"Monitoring the endpoint could be improved, it requires a huge effort."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is reasonably priced."
"It is expensive."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Performing Arts
13%
Insurance Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
I feel that Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus can improve, especially since most of the OEMs are implementing MDR, Managed Service feature, which is still not available with Palo Alto. The MDR feature i...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
I use Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus for threat monitoring, and it is provided by the OEM itself. I use the threat data correlation feature, which correlates with Cortex. We can use it for data corre...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
As a partner with Palo Alto Networks, my email is Sarvajit at bsrgroup.in. My job title is Technical Manager. I confirm that we will publish these reviews on peerspot.com in written or audio format...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Anomali vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Logo
Anomali vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Compared 54% of the time
Recorded Future vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Logo
Recorded Future vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Compared 46% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Competitors
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Threat Hunting Framework Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Threat Hunting Framework
Compared 54% of the time
Cognyte Threat Intelligence Analytics vs Threat Hunting Framework Logo
Cognyte Threat Intelligence Analytics vs Threat Hunting Framework
Compared 46% of the time
More Threat Hunting Framework Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
August 2025
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus reportDownload Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus product report
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
August 2025
Threat Hunting Framework reportDownload Threat Hunting Framework product report
 

Also Known As

Palo Alto Threat Intelligence Management
No data available
 

Overview

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

Palo Alto Networks

Group-IB is a Singapore-based provider of solutions aimed at the detection and prevention of cyberattacks and online fraud. The company also specializes in high-profile cyber investigations and IP protection services. Group-IB’s Threat Intelligence & Attribution system has been named one of the best in class by Gartner, Forrester, and IDC, while its Threat Hunting Framework has been recognized as one of the leaders in Network Detection and Response.
Group-IB’s technological leadership is built on the company’s 18 years of hands-on experience in cybercrime investigations around the world and 65 000 hours of cybersecurity incident response accumulated in one of the biggest forensic laboratory and a round-the-clock center providing a rapid response to cyber incidents — CERT-GIB.
Group-IB is a partner of INTERPOL, Europol, and has been recommended by the OSCE as a cybersecurity solutions provider.

Group-IB
 

Sample Customers

Telkom Indonesia
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
August 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Recorded Future, VirusTotal and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: August 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.