Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs Threat Hunting Framework comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and Threat Hunting Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, NetWitness, Recorded Future and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Threat Intelligence Platforms Report (Updated: October 2022).
655,465 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is alerting.""It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pros →

"Great automatic correlation of all internal activities."

More Threat Hunting Framework Pros →

Cons
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it.""It is a completely cloud-based product at present."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Cons →

"Monitoring the endpoint could be improved, it requires a huge effort."

More Threat Hunting Framework Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
655,465 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:At times in AutoFocus, when you have a homegrown application or you check another threat intelligence feed, it's not malicious but is still categorized as gray. We need to request a change in the… more »
Top Answer:We are using AutoFocus with my playbooks. We use it on a daily basis. We receive alerts on the Playbook. We receive alerts for threat intelligence, malware alerts, and virus alerts. We use Autofocus… more »
Top Answer:Great automatic correlation of all internal activities.
Top Answer:The solution is provided on a subscription basis. In terms of pricing, there are several options offered depending on company size, whether it's a a high tier or low tier bank, so a smaller… more »
Top Answer:The nature of the system means it has to be implemented throughout the organization. You need to implement it on the network layer, the email layer, the web proxy layer, and also the endpoint tunnel… more »
Ranking
Views
1,421
Comparisons
794
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
398
Rating
8.0
Views
443
Comparisons
253
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,083
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

Group-IB is a Singapore-based provider of solutions aimed at the detection and prevention of cyberattacks and online fraud. The company also specializes in high-profile cyber investigations and IP protection services. Group-IB’s Threat Intelligence & Attribution system has been named one of the best in class by Gartner, Forrester, and IDC, while its Threat Hunting Framework has been recognized as one of the leaders in Network Detection and Response.
Group-IB’s technological leadership is built on the company’s 18 years of hands-on experience in cybercrime investigations around the world and 65 000 hours of cybersecurity incident response accumulated in one of the biggest forensic laboratory and a round-the-clock center providing a rapid response to cyber incidents — CERT-GIB.
Group-IB is a partner of INTERPOL, Europol, and has been recommended by the OSCE as a cybersecurity solutions provider.

Offer
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Learn more about Threat Hunting Framework
Sample Customers
Telkom Indonesia
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company13%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Comms Service Provider10%
Government9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm12%
Government11%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise64%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise74%
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
October 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, NetWitness, Recorded Future and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: October 2022.
655,465 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 14th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews while Threat Hunting Framework is ranked 6th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 1 review. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 8.0, while Threat Hunting Framework is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Identifies critical attacks, easy to use, stable, and integrates well ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Threat Hunting Framework writes "High fidelity cyber incident detection is near in real-time, enabling proactive & timely mitigation efforts". Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with Cisco Threat Grid, Mandiant Advantage, Recorded Future, Anomali ThreatStream and IBM X-Force, whereas Threat Hunting Framework is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Cognyte Threat Intelligence Analytics, IBM X-Force and Intel 471.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.