Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs Threat Hunting Framework comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Palo Alto Networks Logo
1,164 views|388 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Group-IB Logo
381 views|242 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and Threat Hunting Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Threat Intelligence Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is alerting.""It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats.""The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic.""I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.""The feature that I like best is the dashboard."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pros →

"Great automatic correlation of all internal activities."

More Threat Hunting Framework Pros →

Cons
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it.""It is a completely cloud-based product at present.""I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring.""I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate.""It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Cons →

"Monitoring the endpoint could be improved, it requires a huge effort."

More Threat Hunting Framework Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is expensive."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced."
  • More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.
    Top Answer:I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate.
    Top Answer:The tool along with other suite of products provides us with threat and alert information.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    1,164
    Comparisons
    388
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    354
    Rating
    7.5
    Views
    381
    Comparisons
    242
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

    Group-IB is a Singapore-based provider of solutions aimed at the detection and prevention of cyberattacks and online fraud. The company also specializes in high-profile cyber investigations and IP protection services. Group-IB’s Threat Intelligence & Attribution system has been named one of the best in class by Gartner, Forrester, and IDC, while its Threat Hunting Framework has been recognized as one of the leaders in Network Detection and Response.
    Group-IB’s technological leadership is built on the company’s 18 years of hands-on experience in cybercrime investigations around the world and 65 000 hours of cybersecurity incident response accumulated in one of the biggest forensic laboratory and a round-the-clock center providing a rapid response to cyber incidents — CERT-GIB.
    Group-IB is a partner of INTERPOL, Europol, and has been recommended by the OSCE as a cybersecurity solutions provider.

    Sample Customers
    Telkom Indonesia
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government12%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Threat Intelligence Platforms
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
    769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 10th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 5 reviews while Threat Hunting Framework is ranked 25th in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 7.8, while Threat Hunting Framework is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Impressive performance and monitoring capabilities but lacks in documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Threat Hunting Framework writes "High fidelity cyber incident detection is near in real-time, enabling proactive & timely mitigation efforts". Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Anomali ThreatStream, VirusTotal, LogRhythm SIEM and Cisco Threat Grid, whereas Threat Hunting Framework is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, DomainTools Iris and Cognyte Threat Intelligence Analytics.

    See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.