Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service vs ScienceLogic comparison

Oracle Log Analytics Cloud ...

Read 45 ScienceLogic reviews

436 Views
320 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

ScienceLogic and Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service compete in IT monitoring and analytics. ScienceLogic has the upper hand in pricing and support satisfaction, while Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service stands out with its feature set.

Features: ScienceLogic offers comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring, automated incident responses, and network performance optimization. Oracle Log Analytics provides robust data analysis, real-time log tracking, and insightful analytics for large-scale enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic provides a flexible deployment model with effective customer service, allowing quick setup and integration. Oracle Log Analytics offers cloud-based deployment but may present a learning curve. Oracle provides extensive documentation and support to assist deployment.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic offers competitive pricing with a significant ROI due to its scalable model. Oracle Log Analytics, while higher in setup cost, delivers robust ROI through advanced functionality, making it suitable for larger enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: April 2025).

Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service vs. ScienceLogic

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Log Analytics Cloud ...

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

14th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (27th), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (24th), Cloud Monitoring Software (19th), AIOps (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the IT Operations Analytics category, the mindshare of Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service is 2.3%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 4.5%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Operations Analytics

Featured Reviews

Niranjan Singh

Principal Solution Architect- Security & Privacy at Sify Technologies

Provides different types of logs, but the logs are dispersed in different layers

As per RBI's regulations, we have to perform active log collection and retention of logs for a certain period. The market is too competitive, and various technologies are being adopted. Different cloud providers are available in the market. I am an SIEM service provider. My technology should be well-versed to accommodate all kinds of landscapes from where I can actively collect and process real-time events. I might lose a customer if I miss something due to a technical glitch. Once I address a specific requirement, Oracle should consider it a universal problem. We have to secure the information assets in today's world. This information should be secure in all kinds of environments and geographies, whether deployed on-premise or on the cloud. All different types of logs are available in a unified manner in Oracle. Overall, I rate the solution a five or six out of ten.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution provides different types of logs like audit, service, and API logs."

"The most valuable feature is mapping."

"The IT analysis provides the best solution as to how the infrastructure is going."

"The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring."

"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."

"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."

"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."

"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."

"The power flow is great."

"Since it is a SaaS-based product, the setup is not very difficult."

"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"The pricing could be improved."

"The logs in the solution are dispersed in different layers, so we have to pick the logs from different areas."

"Reporting is sometimes a little slow."

"If I were a small to medium business, I probably wouldn't choose this provider. It is a heavily configurable, heavyweight, and scalable IT solution for IT infrastructure monitoring."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."

"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."

"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."

"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."

"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."

"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheap compared to its alternatives."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service?

The solution provides different types of logs like audit, service, and API logs.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service?

The solution is cheap compared to its alternatives.

What needs improvement with Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service?

We had issues getting the OCI Event and audit logs on both Azure and AWS infrastructure. The process was much more flexible with Sentinel and FortiSIEM. The logs in the solution are dispersed in di...

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services. If the knowledge for implementation could be spread...

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service

Comparisons

Compared 100% of the time

More Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 11% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 8% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

IT Operations Analytics

Download Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service product report

Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service report

Download ScienceLogic product report

Overview

Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service is a software-as-a-service solution that monitors, aggregates, indexes, and analyzes all log data from your applications and infrastructure (running on-premises or in the cloud). It enables users to search, explore, and correlate this data to troubleshoot problems faster and derive operational insight to make better decisions.

Oracle

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Sample Customers

Safexpress, Optima, Astute Business Solutions

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service vs. ScienceLogic