Apica vs Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service comparison

Apica and Oracle are both solutions in the IT Operations Analytics category. Apica is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7, while Oracle is ranked #15. Apica holds a 1.7% mindshare in IOA, compared to Oracle’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Apica

Read 11 Apica reviews

169 Views
6 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Oracle Log Analytics Cloud ...

Read 3 Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service reviews

287 Views
17 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Apica

Oracle Log Analytics Cloud ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Apica and Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service compete in the application performance monitoring and log analytics category. Oracle appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, despite Apica's flexibility in pricing and customer support.

Features: Apica focuses on monitoring with real-time analytics, synthetic testing, and alerting capabilities. Oracle provides advanced log data visualizations, integration with other Oracle cloud services, and machine learning-based analysis.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apica offers a straightforward deployment model with responsive support, making integration efficient. Oracle has a more complex setup due to comprehensive capabilities but benefits from extensive Oracle Cloud Platform support.

Pricing and ROI: Apica has a cost-effective setup with a flexible pricing strategy, offering quick returns appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Oracle requires a higher initial outlay, offering more value over time through features catering to enterprise-level needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apica

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (17th), Log Management (17th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)

Oracle Log Analytics Cloud ...

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

15th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the IT Operations Analytics category, the mindshare of Apica is 1.7%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service is 2.2%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Operations Analytics

Featured Reviews

Punith H K

Senior Systems Engineer at Infosys

Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features

It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.

Read full review

Niranjan Singh

Principal Solution Architect- Security & Privacy at Sify Technologies

Provides different types of logs, but the logs are dispersed in different layers

As per RBI's regulations, we have to perform active log collection and retention of logs for a certain period. The market is too competitive, and various technologies are being adopted. Different cloud providers are available in the market. I am an SIEM service provider. My technology should be well-versed to accommodate all kinds of landscapes from where I can actively collect and process real-time events. I might lose a customer if I miss something due to a technical glitch. Once I address a specific requirement, Oracle should consider it a universal problem. We have to secure the information assets in today's world. This information should be secure in all kinds of environments and geographies, whether deployed on-premise or on the cloud. All different types of logs are available in a unified manner in Oracle. Overall, I rate the solution a five or six out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We see the benefit almost every day. It allows us to be alerted whenever there is a store that is not responding properly around the world. We do have a network operation center (NOC) who receives these alerts, immediately checking if everything is okay."

"What I like the most is that Apica can simulate different browsers and different versions of desktop or mobile browsers."

"Our application SREs do script checks in such a way that closely mimic our customers' actions using the platform. Because there are so many different ways and options to be able to configure checks to closely mirror your applications' capabilities, it provides a lot of optionality for teams to create the right type of check that can notify when there are any issues. At the end of the day, we want our monitoring tools to be able to catch any outage before our customers do. This is where Apica Synthetic does a great job."

"The solution captures all our requests and responses."

"APICa allows me to record APIs easily and enhances scripts through options like auto-correlation, enabling me to access dynamic fields."

"As always, within the IT industry, everybody's always looking to upgrade and update everything else like that. Apica has been one of those things but it's really hard to replace because it offers us the unique capability to see what the customer is seeing. A lot of other ones can do Selenium script and things like that, but there's a lot in Apica that we use right now. We utilize a lot of the scenario options in Apica right now, and there's a lot of other ones that do parts of it, but it doesn't do everything that Apica does."

"The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery."

"It uses a basic scripting language, which is easy to learn and customize as needed. Compared to LoadRunner, I found writing and customizing code much easier in Apica."

More Apica pros

"The most valuable feature is mapping."

"The solution provides different types of logs like audit, service, and API logs."

"The IT analysis provides the best solution as to how the infrastructure is going."

Cons

"Apica was a relatively new tool when I started using it. Although Apica had good documentation, it still felt less developed or advanced than a tool like LoadRunner."

"There are some components of the user interface that are not up to date. Just to give you an idea, today we have web applications that are called single-page applications that are much faster than the old style of web application. If we can move faster into the flow of the graphic user interface, and in a more effective way, it will save us a lot of time."

"The reporting part that we use for our executives needs a bit more customization capabilities. Right now, you can use only the three main templates for reporting. We would like to be able to customize them."

"Learning the tool has always been a little difficult from a scripting perspective because the framework is proprietary and unique. Once we became used to what it does and how to perform it, then it became easier for my team and me. I would like to see some of the testing steps be part of a more well-known language, like Java or Python. That would be a big improvement."

"Apica should add more features and integrations with different tools and certain ticketing systems, like ServiceNow."

"Alerting needs improvement. It's a little noisy. It needs some better options. Currently, they have an issue, when you set up a synthetic monitor, you can set up where it's monitoring from, a data center that Apica owns."

"We have been focused on reducing polling times for synthetic checks. We have gone from 10 minutes down to five minutes for a pretty broad swath, but there is some appetite to reduce that further, which could be an improvement."

"When it comes to the way the internal agent is installed, because you can install an application on a server, I would love to see the application Docker-ized. If you could install internal agents using Docker or using containers, it would be easier for us to manage them and spin up internal agents."

More Apica cons

"The logs in the solution are dispersed in different layers, so we have to pick the logs from different areas."

"Reporting is sometimes a little slow."

"The pricing could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"License management is another area that Apica could do better. We have already had these conversations with our account teams. This is something that they are looking at largely improving in upcoming releases. I believe that this is already on their roadmap."

"The product is less expensive compared to LoadRunner."

"The pricing and licensing are very reasonable. At the end of the day, you are using their technology/software and getting X amount of checks for a very decent value. As for discounts, they try to meet your budgets as much as they can. For example, if you need 100 checks and you have X amount of budget for it, then they will try and get down to that price. Costing-wise, it is a reasonably cost product. They will always try and come down to your price if you need them to come down to it by knocking off certain areas."

"Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."

"Apica is pretty cost-effective if you buy both solutions together: Synthetic and LoadTest. If you are going for one solution, the cost is on par with any tool in the market."

"I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides."

"The level of alerting accuracy has saved us time and money in operational costs. Overall, it has automated a lot of the manual efforts which have been more complex with some of our other scripting tools or monitors. So, it brings things together by doing things faster and saves us money."

More Apica pricing and cost advice

"The solution is cheap compared to its alternatives."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

10%

Media Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?

The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?

I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?

Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica

Compared 28% of the time

Cribl vs Apica

Compared 21% of the time

Datadog vs Apica

Compared 16% of the time

AlertSite vs Apica

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Apica

Compared 12% of the time

More Apica Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service

Compared 100% of the time

More Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apica

June 2025

Download Apica product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Operations Analytics

June 2025

Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service report

Download Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service product report

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic

No data available

Overview

Apica offers a unified platform to remove complexity and cost associated with data management. You collect, control, store, and observe your data and can quickly identify and resolve performance issues before they impact the end-user. Apica Ascent swiftly analyzes telemetry data in real-time, enabling prompt issue resolution, while automated root cause analysis, powered by machine learning, streamlines troubleshooting in complex distributed systems. The platform simplifies data collection by automating and managing agents through the platform’s Fleet product. Its Flow product simplifies and optimizes pipeline control with AI and ML to help you easily understand complex workflows. Its Store component allows you to never run out of storage space while you index and store machine data centrally on one platform and reduce costs, and remediate faster. Observe offers modern observability data management, helping you with MELT data, effortless dashboarding, and seamless integration of synthetic and real data.

Experience the Apica Ascent Platform

Apica

Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service is a software-as-a-service solution that monitors, aggregates, indexes, and analyzes all log data from your applications and infrastructure (running on-premises or in the cloud). It enables users to search, explore, and correlate this data to troubleshoot problems faster and derive operational insight to make better decisions.

Oracle

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo

Safexpress, Optima, Astute Business Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service

June 2025

Free Report: Apica vs. Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apica vs. Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service report.

See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.