We performed a comparison between Oracle Java DB and SQL Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools."The additional value of having Java inside the Oracle database is all the security that is applied to an Oracle database will be enforced on Java's stored procedures as well."
"It's very clever."
"The most valuable feature is automation."
"The solution is stable."
"Able to write queries more efficiently and the management of data has become better and easier."
"It has a programming language so anything that we require for Selenium is all available there."
"There have been no issues in relation to stability. We've never really had do to any recoveries. It is very stable."
"We've found it to basically be pretty problem-free."
"I use the menu on the management view credit section to get information from the database."
"Managing database is very good."
"It's a good learning environment, it's easy enough to learn and understand. Anybody that picks up the language early on will be able to develop in it."
"It integrates well with other platforms."
"For me, the initial setup is very easy as I have years of experience with the product."
"I have found that SQL Server works very well in the Microsoft Dynamics environment."
"I have found the most valuable features to be the flexibility and the vast amount of features available."
"In terms of improvement, I'd like an automation tool that is lower priced. The core prices are very high."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"It'll be better if Oracle Java supports open source technologies, like Node.js."
"Needs improvement in consistency issues with respect to timeframes."
"The solution should continue to keep updating and improving the Java language."
"The biggest lesson that I have learned from using Oracle products is vendor lock-in."
"The configuration process can be a little complex."
"Since this is a relational order system, scalability has a limit. If your system is very big, you need bigger servers and you have to spend more money. We scale a system up to a certain level, and then we move or shift data to the warehouse, which is NoSQL. We then do not have any bottleneck in scaling. For using this technique we are happy with it."
"The pricing could be more affordable."
"I would like to see better integration between their link server and other platforms, such as IBM."
"Linux-based editions are not yet proven to be on par with Windows deployments."
"SQL Server could improve by providing something similar to an interface or dashboard where a developer can do debugging, this would make a developer's work easier. Additionally, the optimization could be better. If there was an interface showing information needed for the optimization it would help because there can be some data loss making it difficult to optimize the SQL Server."
"In the next releases, I would only like more enhanced backups and more restore points."
"The Management Studio is a pretty heavy piece of software, and it's sometimes slow. I would recommend making an express version of the Management Studio, which is lighter and has fewer features but is a little faster."
Oracle Java DB is ranked 23rd in Relational Databases Tools with 7 reviews while SQL Server is ranked 1st in Relational Databases Tools with 259 reviews. Oracle Java DB is rated 8.2, while SQL Server is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Java DB writes "Ability to handle large volumes and data sets but could be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Server writes "Easy to use and provides good speed and data recovery". Oracle Java DB is most compared with MySQL, Oracle Database, Apache Derby, SAP HANA and MariaDB, whereas SQL Server is most compared with MariaDB, SAP HANA, Oracle Database, LocalDB and IBM Db2 Database.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.