We performed a comparison between Oracle GoldenGate and Quest SharePlex based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution has a well-known procedure for troubleshooting and tuning the performance, providing for smooth operation."
"The solution's existing SaaS platform for data integration gives us an edge."
"This solution provides us with real-time replication and it does not affect the performance of other operations, which is very important to us."
"Since the world is going towards open source, the solution's heterogeneous data migration feature is very useful."
"The replication of the data table is one of the best features."
"It is a scalable solution."
"When we are replicating data between similar databases then it is straightforward."
"Oracle GoldenGate features work fine, which is what I like about it. I also like that it's scalable, easy to set up, and has good technical support."
"The core features of the solution we like are the reliability of the data transfer and the accuracy of data read and write. The stability of the solution is also excellent."
"I like SharePlex's Compare and Repair tool."
"There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync, there are ways to find them and fix the problem on the spot. Since these are very common issues, we can easily fix these types of problems using utilities, like compare and repair. So, if you find something is out of sync, then you can just repair that table. It basically syncs that table from source to target to see if there are any differences. It will then replicate those differences to the target."
"Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously."
"The core replication and its performance. Performance is crucial, and SharePlex is by far the fastest. The way it handles replication to multiple targets along with basic filtering, as well as from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."
"What needs improvement in Oracle GoldenGate is the support. Another feature that needs to be improved in the solution is its GUI. It would be useful for programmers or users to be able to work from the GUI, not just from the command line. Simplifying how Oracle GoldenGate is used would also make the solution better."
"The solution is quite costly, and if they could reduce their pricing, it would be more economical to implement."
"Oracle GoldenGate can enhance its functionality by enabling the merging of multiple migrations into one."
"The tool's connections are disconnected at times. The tool needs to integrate other databases."
"Troubleshooting issues is not always the easiest. It should be easier to troubleshoot. Their support can also be improved. They don't read your problem statement and waste a lot of time. GoldenGate for big data is actually a separate license. It is sort of a separate product, but it might fall underneath your GoldenGate category. If we're talking about big data, its interaction with big data sources is poorly documented."
"A clean and user-friendly graphical interface based on common design principles would be beneficial."
"There are a lot of bugs in the solution."
"It should be easier to integrate this solution with non-Oracle databases, including cloud-based solutions hosted on Azure."
"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."
"The reporting features need improvement. It would be very good for users to have a clear understanding of the status of replication."
"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities. Often, if we want to improve the performance of posting, we have to bump up a parameter. That means we need to stop the process, come up with a figure that we want to bump the parameter up to, and then start SharePlex. Machine learning and AI capabilities for these kinds of improvement would tremendously help boost productivity for us."
"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training."
"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market. That would be a considerable improvement."
Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews while Quest SharePlex is ranked 24th in Data Integration with 5 reviews. Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2, while Quest SharePlex is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest SharePlex writes "It reduces the downtime and migration time exponentially". Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Azure Data Factory, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) and IBM InfoSphere DataStage, whereas Quest SharePlex is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Oracle Enterprise Manager, Fivetran and JumpMind SymmetricDS. See our Oracle GoldenGate vs. Quest SharePlex report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.