Oracle CRM vs SugarCRM Platform comparison

Oracle and SugarCRM are both solutions in the CRM category. Oracle is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.6, while SugarCRM is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.5. Oracle holds a 3.1% mindshare in CRM, compared to SugarCRM’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of SugarCRM users who would recommend it.

Oracle CRM

Read 39 Oracle CRM reviews

1,399 Views
878 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

SugarCRM Platform

Read 12 SugarCRM Platform reviews

390 Views
145 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Oracle CRM

SugarCRM Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Oracle CRM and SugarCRM are competitors in the CRM space, offering various features tailored to different business needs. Oracle CRM has the upper hand in terms of comprehensive solutions and advanced capabilities, whereas SugarCRM is favored for cost-effectiveness and ease of use.

Features: Oracle CRM provides a comprehensive integration framework for sales, service, marketing, and cloud solutions. Its industry-specific solutions cater to diverse business needs, with notable predictive analytics capabilities. Oracle CRM stands out for its strong data management system and broad customization options. SugarCRM emphasizes foundational CRM functionalities like lead, account, and opportunity creation. It enhances customization and flexibility with marketing automation and case management at a more affordable price point. The improved user interface and adaptability are key strengths of SugarCRM.

Room for Improvement: Oracle CRM requires enhancement in usability, particularly in mobile functionality and integration with non-Oracle applications. The user experience could benefit from a modernized interface with less manual intervention. SugarCRM could improve its data visualization and user interface for better engagement. Limitations in system administration tools and mobile integration are areas where SugarCRM can advance. Both platforms face delays in support response times, with Oracle CRM needing improvements in UI design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle CRM offers deployment flexibility across private, public, and hybrid clouds but is commonly used on-premises. SugarCRM supports on-premises and public cloud deployment, noted for its straightforward implementation. Oracle provides a stratified support system with slower response times, while SugarCRM is known for faster, friendlier customer service, though Oracle's network benefits complex issues.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle CRM targets larger enterprises with higher pricing justified by its extensive functionalities and scalability, though prohibitive for smaller businesses. SugarCRM provides a budget-friendly approach, with affordable licensing and easy CRM usage entry. Oracle delivers significant ROI for complex needs, whereas SugarCRM offers solid ROI for businesses seeking straightforward CRM with lower overhead costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle CRM vs. SugarCRM Platform Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle CRM vs. SugarCRM Platform

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,957 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle CRM

Ranking in CRM

8th

Ranking in Marketing Automation

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SugarCRM Platform

Ranking in CRM

24th

Ranking in Marketing Automation

7th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CRM Customer Engagement Centers (8th), Sales Force Automation (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the CRM category, the mindshare of Oracle CRM is 3.1%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SugarCRM Platform is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

CRM

Featured Reviews

Omair Bokhari

Head of IT Operations at Fatima Group

Helps business track their customers, sales leads, and opportunities

An area for improvement is the vendors' inability to understand the customers' requirements and communicate them to Oracle. When we started to implement the tool, and during the very initial phases of the product, when Oracle launched it, our company opted for it. We faced a few challenges related to the product speed associated with some functionalities that were not available when the tool was just launched, but later on, it became available, and right now, we are actually using it. The tool is fulfilling our requirements. There were no major hiccups or challenges due to the tool. The solution's mobile app needs to be enriched with more functionalities in the future.

Read full review

Styliana Araouzou

Senior Operations Analyst at Etoro

Customizable, easy to configure, and reliable

My company is considered a customer and an end-user. I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using right now. It's a company that offers lots of user manuals and you can find most of your stuff there before starting development. I'd advise potential new users to go through everything. I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. By default, it comes with a really good model where you can start working with it without having a lot of developers in your team. It's a system that includes everything related to the client and you can see everything under one screen without having a different product or system. It's been great, for the most part.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Oracle CRM helped us better understand the customer journey."

"It is one of the most proficient CRM tools out there. It is comprehensive and scalable. It covers most of the CRM activities, business lines, and business requirements."

"We are able to take back control of our client sales information and analyze it for the future to improve."

"Everything related to insights and dashboards is valuable. It is great for tracking all the effort and generating reports."

"For the most part, the solution is straightforward."

"The most valuable feature of Oracle CRM is the organization it provides."

"It is very simple."

"It has a wide variety of use cases."

More Oracle CRM pros

"The most valuable features of the SugarCRM platform include its flexibility in customizing fields, layouts, and dashboards."

"The most valuable feature is relation capability, which allows us to relay customers with invoice orders."

"It has sales email campaigns, plus integration with Active Directory."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is its low cost."

"The most valuable features of Sugar Enterprise are the exports of graphics, statuses, complaints, and tasks."

"It works well with Jira. You can customize it to fit your needs."

Cons

"The configuration requires a lot of technical intervention."

"It’s complex to customize the tool."

"I'd like to see more feature enhancements."

"The interface could be more user friendly. It is currently not intuitive, and it can be better. The onboarding process for the end users of this solution could be easier, and there should be a few more things for user knowledge and training. It takes a lot of technical knowledge to get used to it."

"I would like to see the UI improved ."

"Customization is an area in the solution that takes too much time. So, it needs to be improved."

"I would like to remove all manual work and get the benefits of the function that Oracle provides without any manual interference or paperwork."

"The user interface and performance could be better."

More Oracle CRM cons

"It lacks customization, and this is the main reason that we are switching to a different solution."

"Sugar Enterprise could improve by removing bugs and glitches. For example, a comment was made but in the comment section, it was never displayed. However, the problems we faced might not be the fault of the solution."

"You cannot include all your entities under one instance at the moment."

"In the next release, I would like to see personalization of information about customers or specific businesses or opportunities."

"I would appreciate it if SugarCRM could support us in on-premise implementation."

"I would like to see more integration on a mobile platform in the next release."

"While it is already user-friendly, a slight enhancement in UI design, especially in terms of color combinations, could make the platform more visually appealing and comfortable to use."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product’s pricing is very high."

"Compared to alternative solutions Oracle CRM is expensive."

"Oracle is very expensive, but you have to pay to get this kind of scalability and database flexibility."

"Every year, we have new users, and we get new licenses. It depends on various things such as the number of users and expansion of our business lines."

"The solution is expensive."

"Shifting from traditional licensing and monthly maintenance fees to a subscription-based, pay-as-you-use model offers several advantages. This approach only charges me for my transactions, aligning costs with business performance. As my company grows, the software provider's revenue grows proportionally to the increased usage. The cost and suitability of Oracle CRM depend on factors like location, industry, and compliance needs. It may be more common for US companies to use Oracle CRM and European ones to use SAP."

"The costing for this solution is very high. It targets top tier companies. This solution can be split up into multiple modules to cater to the low tier customers."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis."

More Oracle CRM pricing and cost advice

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CRM solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

11%

Government

11%

Engineering Company

17%

Educational Organization

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle CRM?

The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically enrich deals by connecting to APIs. This allows me to gather additional information about companies, number of employees, and data from the...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle CRM?

The price of Oracle CRM in Vietnam is high, which is a concern. Clients must buy the license once, and if there are updates in the year, they need to buy the new version.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle CRM?

Oracle CRM should improve in terms of AI capabilities and user interface design. Compared to Salesforce, it lacks advanced features in these areas and is not as user-friendly.

See all answers

What do you like most about Sugar Enterprise?

The most valuable features of the SugarCRM platform include its flexibility in customizing fields, layouts, and dashboards.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sugar Enterprise?

All are almost the same pricing. Maybe the cheapest is Salesforce, I believe.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sugar Enterprise?

The only challenge was that we implemented it in our on-premise data center instead of using it in the cloud. That was a little bit of a challenge. But it was overcome with the help of SugarCRM com...

See all answers

Comparisons

Siebel CRM vs Oracle CRM

Compared 34% of the time

SAP CRM vs Oracle CRM

Compared 30% of the time

Salesforce Sales Cloud vs Oracle CRM

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics CRM vs Oracle CRM

Compared 11% of the time

Zoho CRM vs Oracle CRM

Compared 5% of the time

More Oracle CRM Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle CRM

June 2025

Download Oracle CRM product report

Buyer's Guide

SugarCRM Platform

June 2025

Download SugarCRM Platform product report

Also Known As

Market2Lead

No data available

Overview

On demand CRM with contextual intelligence, adaptive business planning, and analytics. Supports cloud integration with Outlook and mobile devices, as well as sales and marketing applications. Multi-tenancy or single-tenancy options available.

Oracle

SugarCRM is a versatile CRM solution that facilitates communication and organization within a company. Its primary use case includes call and comment logging, account relation, customer detail storage, verification handling, transaction tracking, marketing material management, and payment transaction handling. The most valuable functionalities include customizable exports of graphics, statuses, complaints, and tasks, as well as its scalability, stability, and low cost. It integrates well with Jira and can be easily configured. The platform improves efficiency, productivity, collaboration, communication, and coordination within organizations, while also providing valuable insights and data analytics for informed decision-making.

SugarCRM

Sample Customers

Turk Telekom, yoo Ltd , Mobilitec, Sanipex Group, ec4u expert consulting AG, Hover Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., Lawn Tennis Association, Geodis, Freedom Technology

Redglaze Group, TengoInternet, Hilco, Bancvue, Vet Adivsor

Buyer's Guide

Oracle CRM vs. SugarCRM Platform

May 2025

Free Report: Oracle CRM vs. SugarCRM Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle CRM vs. SugarCRM Platform and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle CRM vs. SugarCRM Platform report.

See our list of best CRM vendors and best Marketing Automation vendors.

We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.