Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

Broadcom and Zenoss are both solutions in the Event Monitoring category. Broadcom is ranked #13, while Zenoss is ranked #14. Broadcom holds a 3.4% mindshare in EM, compared to Zenoss’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.
OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...
Read 27 OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence reviews
  • 481 Views
  • 260 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
Zenoss Cloud
Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews
  • 1,336 Views
  • 160 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Zenoss Cloud and OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence are prominent competitors in IT monitoring and automation. Zenoss Cloud seems to hold an advantage with its comprehensive monitoring capabilities tailored to modern infrastructure needs, while OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence stands out with robust automation features essential for mainframe environments.

Features: Zenoss Cloud provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities, scalability across diverse environments, and advanced analytics. This includes dynamic service modeling and unified monitoring across both cloud and on-premise systems. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence excels with extensive automation routines, integration capabilities suited for mainframe environments, and features like System State Manager (SSM) and OPSLOG for enhanced automation and operations monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Zenoss Cloud could improve its integration with niche legacy systems, expand its customization options for advanced users, and enhance real-time alerting mechanisms. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence may benefit from simplifying its initial deployment process, improving user interface for easier operation, and offering more flexible reporting tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zenoss Cloud offers easy deployment with a cloud-native approach and responsive customer support suitable for rapid implementation. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence provides specialized support essential for mainframe environments, albeit with a more complex deployment process requiring specialized knowledge for intricate automation setups.

Pricing and ROI: Zenoss Cloud presents a cost-effective setup with a predictable pricing model, enabling manageable ROI for scalable solutions. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence, with higher upfront costs, promises significant ROI through reduced manual interventions, proving cost-effective for firms prioritizing automation efficiency.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. Zenoss Cloud
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...
Ranking in Event Monitoring
13th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.3
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Mainframe Management (7th)
Zenoss Cloud
Ranking in Event Monitoring
14th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (31st), Network Monitoring Software (77th), Server Monitoring (26th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (53rd), Container Monitoring (10th), Cloud Monitoring Software (39th), AIOps (25th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 3.4%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 2.1%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Event Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

GP
It automates responses, preventing issues from becoming more severe
I just installed version 12.3, which actually already has a number of new features. It's going to make it easier for some of our new users. I'm old-school, I learned it the old way. I actually want to go back and implement it and start doing things the new way. As I need to train people, it's going to make it easier for them and make the learning curve much shorter. The new release addressed some shortcomings of the product. It was old-school. The learning curve was a little bit long in the beginning, but it's really come a long way.
Read full review
ClaudiaChen - PeerSpot reviewer
Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features
As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's very flexible. You can customize what you need to, which is good. For example, you can do your own coding inside the tool, make your own scripting tooling."
"Valuable features include: SSM, which provides for orderly startup and shutdown; OPSLOG, which enables filtering by message-id, and/or jobname(s); Rules, as OPS/REXX interface streamlines deployment, interfaces easily with JES2 and z/OS."
"OPS/REXX is valuable because it allows us almost unlimited flexibility in automating our system."
"It reduces the number of repetitive motions required by a human to respond to the system."
"Once automatic IPL has been defined, anyone can perform an IPL with very little intervention. We know that all of the components will be started correctly."
"It alerts the operators when it is time to repair the communications and the IPLs."
"Stability is probably the best out-of-the-box. Put it in, set it up, and you leave it alone. It works wonderfully."
"The documentation is simple, easy to follow, and use. A limited, first-time systems programmer can do it, in that it is out-of-the-box almost functional."
More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros
"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper."
"Its Docker Container concept is mind blowing. It is the first monitoring tool which comes with Docker features."
"It's easy to use."
"What I like most about Zenoss Service Dynamics is that it monitors the devices and gives close to real-time alerts. For example, in case the device is not available, Zenoss Service Dynamics generates an alert so my team can resolve the issue."
"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."
"The product offers good documentation that helps with initial training."
"The most valuable feature is the flexible discovery mechanism."
 

Cons

"Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions."
"Scalability is zero. It cannot be scaled because of its age."
"Some of the command sequences are too long."
"The further expansion of the mainframe teamcenter interface. Also, the web services support is something that I am looking into."
"One thing that comes to mind is the MQ interface. The last time we tried to use it, it seemed a little clunky."
"The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script.​"
"The interfaces to USS, CA UIM could be better. CA Common Services interfaces - namely Zdata Mover, Zmessage Service, Zdatacolletcor - are poorly documented."
"The GUI interface could be improved, but that is coming. They are working on that."
More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons
"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."
"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."
"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."
"The AI aspect needs to improve."
"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"
"Now it is stable, but they should design threshold parameters in percentage instead of raw values."
"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."
"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."
"It depends on the customer, what he wants."
"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Logistics Company
20%
Educational Organization
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Computer Software Company
16%
Performing Arts
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SCOM vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Logo
SCOM vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence
Compared 20% of the time
IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Logo
IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence
Compared 20% of the time
BMC AMI Ops Monitoring vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Logo
BMC AMI Ops Monitoring vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence
Compared 17% of the time
IBM OMEGAMON vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Logo
IBM OMEGAMON vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence
Compared 15% of the time
CA Automation Point vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Logo
CA Automation Point vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence
Compared 15% of the time
More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors
Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud Logo
Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud
Compared 26% of the time
Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud Logo
Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud
Compared 24% of the time
Nagios Core vs Zenoss Cloud Logo
Nagios Core vs Zenoss Cloud
Compared 10% of the time
SolarWinds AppOptics vs Zenoss Cloud Logo
SolarWinds AppOptics vs Zenoss Cloud
Compared 9% of the time
Centreon vs Zenoss Cloud Logo
Centreon vs Zenoss Cloud
Compared 7% of the time
More Zenoss Cloud Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence
August 2025
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence reportDownload OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report
Buyer's Guide
Zenoss Cloud
July 2025
Zenoss Cloud reportDownload Zenoss Cloud product report
 

Also Known As

CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation
Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics
 

Overview

z/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.
Broadcom
Zenoss Cloud revolutionizes IT infrastructure monitoring with a service-centric approach, prioritizing the overall health of services and applications. Harnessing the power of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AIOps), Zenoss Cloud offers end-to-end visibility across servers, networks, storage, and applications. Real-time monitoring, event correlation, and automated remediation ensure immediate insights and efficient issue resolution. The customizable dashboards empower users to tailor visualizations to their needs, while scalability accommodates diverse infrastructures. Zenoss Cloud guarantees improved application performance, reduced downtime, and enhanced IT efficiency, making it an ideal choice for businesses of all sizes, from small enterprises seeking simplicity to large corporations requiring advanced scalability. Experience unified monitoring and proactive management with Zenoss Cloud, a comprehensive solution that transforms IT infrastructure optimization in today's complex environments.
Zenoss
 

Sample Customers

Tieto
2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation
Buyer's Guide
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. Zenoss Cloud
July 2025
Free Report: OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. Zenoss Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. Zenoss Cloud report.
See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.