OpenText Identity Manager vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle comparison

OpenText and RSA are both solutions in the Identity Management (IM) category. OpenText is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0, while RSA is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 2.1% mindshare in IAM, compared to RSA’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 60% of RSA users who would recommend it.

OpenText Identity Manager

Read 18 OpenText Identity Manager reviews

1,564 Views
1,173 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

RSA Identity Governance and...

Read 10 RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle reviews

854 Views
675 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

OpenText Identity Manager

RSA Identity Governance and...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and OpenText Identity Manager compete in the identity management category. RSA appears to have the upper hand due to its favorable pricing and ease of deployment, although OpenText offers advanced features.

Features: RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle enables streamlined identity processes with its policy automation, audit capabilities, and access request management. OpenText Identity Manager offers advanced role management, identity lifecycle optimization, and comprehensive integration options.

Room for Improvement: RSA can improve its customization capabilities and integration options. OpenText requires easier implementation and a more user-friendly interface. Both products could enhance scalability to cater to larger organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: RSA provides a straightforward deployment process with comprehensive support, facilitating seamless integration without extensive technical expertise. OpenText requires a more complex deployment and initial training due to its extensive customization options. RSA's responsive support is a highlight, while OpenText's customization potential yields long-term benefits.

Pricing and ROI: RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is cost-effective, appealing to budget-conscious buyers with a clear path to ROI due to its efficient features. OpenText Identity Manager demands a higher initial investment but offers substantial ROI through advanced capabilities and reduced operational costs over time.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Identity Manager vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Identity Manager vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Identity Manager

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

17th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (9th)

RSA Identity Governance and...

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

22nd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the mindshare of OpenText Identity Manager is 2.1%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity Management (IM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Identity Manager	2.1%
RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle	1.2%
Other	96.7%

Identity Management (IM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2401464

Architect at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

Updates systems quickly and does not have a limit on the number of users

NetIQ does not have a limit on the number of users. The tool is secure by nature. It can have more than one billion users. Event-based systems know what has to be changed. SQL-based systems can only change using time and date. Event-based systems provide immediate results, while SQL-based systems need time to sync. It is totally different from a security perspective. Event-based systems can update all the systems in seconds or minutes. Other systems do it within 24 hours. The basic event-based system is AI-driven. It has some kind of robotics and programming. Other tools need programming. I like systems that have prebuilt ideas of security. NetIQ has been in the market for a long period. It has all the systems and connectors. There is not much coding. We just need to configure the products. We need not do any programming. I haven't seen any other product that needs only configuration to do the job. Most products in the market are SQL-based. They need programming. Some service providers who sell other products to customers do not sell NetIQ because they can make more money by selling solutions that need more consultancy and programming. More hours lead to more money.

Read full review

Harshul Nayak

Senior Project Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Streamline identity lifecycle management with intuitive interfaces and robust policy features

The functions of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle, especially the IGA, are quite strong with their custom forms and workflows integrated. The user interface is very friendly and easy to use, making it a good product overall. However, it still has to be on-premise and the cloud version is not easily accessible, as dedicated instances are required and machines cannot be shared as multi-tenant for various customers. The advanced policy features of RSA definitely help in defining certain policies such as segregation of duties. That's particularly useful along with creating different access reviews. Regarding access control in simplifying access management, RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle has strong foundations of groups and roles, which help in defining all policies very easily. This makes it very easy to integrate with other access management tools or privileged access management tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the eDirectory feature."

"The most valuable feature of NetIQ Identity Manager for identity synchronization is the ability to provide users with all necessary access on day one through automated provisioning, facilitated by approval workflows."

"The most valuable features are Password Reset Alerts, Password Sync, and SQL connectors."

"The access request management has improved significantly in terms of its user interface. What sets it apart from competitors like SailPoint is that it's an event-based solution rather than schedule-based. That's a key differentiator."

"It's a very flexible tool, so you can synchronize multiple sources of data and you have multiple connections to various kinds of systems."

"The most valuable feature of this solution has been the ability for us to integrate a lot of external systems, and the automatic transfer of a lot of identity information. Additionally, the customization is very good."

"The most valuable features of NetIQ Identity Manager are the synchronization of different directories, such as Active Directory. We have many Active Directory systems, not only one."

"The product is easy to use."

More OpenText Identity Manager pros

"The most valuable feature is the security, in particular, the One Time Password support."

"Roles, connectors for provisioning and re-accreditation or reviews help greatly to govern user access."

"RSA Identity Governance and lifecycles are good for the access certification and auditing sections."

"The user interface is very friendly and easy to use, making it a good product overall."

"The data collection is excellent and easy to do. It does not require a lot of configuration nor does it require rules to be written like other competitors do."

"With the tool in place, you need to hire fewer people to provide access, and you have control over your processes."

Cons

"Areas for improvement are further enhancing the access granting process to reduce time and improve accuracy."

"The integrations must be made easier."

"We have another system that is using the SAML system, and we also integrate with Active Directory only. If NetIQ Identity Manager can integrate directly, we would not need to use the Active Directory directory."

"It needs some modern features. They should improve and modernize their management interface. It has been created over years and by different persons. You can see different applications, different management consoles for different things. There should be an integrated interface."

"The solution architecture is somewhat complex. For some components, the necessary resilience is not inherent."

"NetIQ Identity Manager could improve by updating the user portal, it is out of date."

"The interface is old and outdated, and the design software seems archaic."

"There's no huge thing missing, because it's already comprehensive. Now and then, however, there might be a minor issue."

More OpenText Identity Manager cons

"Technical support in Pakistan can be improved."

"RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle could improve out-of-the-box customization."

"The user interface and workflow need improvement, and more connectors would help."

"Every connector that you have in the product needs to be custom-built, so there are not a lot of standard connectors available in the product, because of which there are a lot of hidden consultancy costs."

"There are scalability issues. This product does not scale very well. It is not a good product for load balancing / active–active architecture."

"If you use the appliance version then it won't handle a huge database volume."

"This product is missing a lot of features which other competitors are providing. One of the key features that are missing right now is risk scoring. Additionally, there is not much scope for customization - everything is hard-coded and predefined, so it does not allow the developers to make many modifications."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is a bit high and could be reduced."

"You just need to be aware that the more systems you connect, the more license fees you have to pay."

"Micro Focus is flexible when it comes to price. The cost varies from customer to customer. There are no additional costs, though. Everything is included."

"I would rate the pricing a two out of ten, with one being low price and ten being high price. It is significantly more cost-effective than the major players in the market."

"It would easily help them in getting more market and more customers if more consultants knew about their software. If they could keep it free for schools for teaching purposes, it would be good. I had to pay myself to get it and use it for training. Their competitors are giving it for free. I had to pay for it myself. They are losing market to their competitors."

"The solution is quite affordable."

"Pricing varies based on user count/number of modules you need."

"We are using the cloud platform, but we don't find it compatible to be served as a multi-tenant platform. This is a large drawback. It becomes expensive because it is then an all-dedicated solution. You have to have a separate tenant for each client, which increases the cost. The overall unit pricing can be less expensive than how it is right now."

"I rate the product's price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetIQ Identity Manager?

The most valuable feature of NetIQ Identity Manager for identity synchronization is the ability to provide users with all necessary access on day one through automated provisioning, facilitated by ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetIQ Identity Manager?

The pricing depends on whether we buy the solution as a service or a license. The license is expensive. If we buy it as a service for a large number of users, it is the cheapest tool we can get. Th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetIQ Identity Manager?

The tool is used mostly in big systems to understand what is happening. There are not many technicians who know how to use the product. The vendor must provide an easier console for configuring thi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

There is room for improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle. As the size becomes larger, the collections and unifications of the IDs process become quite slow, which can be improved fu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

We provide RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle as a service, mainly to oversee the digital identity lifecycle, from the initiation to the off-boarding at the end of that digital identity. Our cli...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

Overall, I would rate RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle at an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs OpenText Identity Manager

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs OpenText Identity Manager

Compared 12% of the time

One Identity Manager vs OpenText Identity Manager

Compared 8% of the time

EVOLVEUM midPoint vs OpenText Identity Manager

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Identity Management vs OpenText Identity Manager

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Identity Manager Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 52% of the time

One Identity Manager vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 22% of the time

Saviynt vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Identity Governance vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 6% of the time

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Identity Manager

January 2026

Download OpenText Identity Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

January 2026

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle report

Download RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle product report

Also Known As

Novell Identity Manager

SecurID

Overview

OpenText Identity Manager provides event-driven capabilities with real-time synchronization and integration across multiple systems. Known for its flexibility, it offers features like password sync, access management, and directory synchronization.

OpenText Identity Manager is a comprehensive identity management platform, designed to support role-based provisioning and seamless integration of external systems. Its notable features include the Designer and Analyzer tools and robust self-service password management, enhancing its usability. Organizations leverage its event-driven architecture for real-time synchronization and detailed tracing, facilitating efficient identity management across different data sources. However, enhancements in Windows OS compatibility, user interface modernization, and cloud support are needed. Training remains crucial, given the system's complexity and unique language.

What are the Key Features of OpenText Identity Manager?

Real-time Synchronization: Event-driven architecture enables instant updates across systems.
Role Based Provisioning: Streamlines managing roles and permissions within organizations.
Flexible Integration: Connects with multiple data sources, enhancing system interoperability.
Password Synchronization: Simplifies password management across platforms.
Access Management: Offers tools to manage permissions and security with ease.

Why Consider OpenText Identity Manager in Reviews?

Comprehensive Support: Offers identity lifecycle management, enhancing user experience.
Security Enhancements: Improves compliance management and access control.
Scalability: Efficiently supports large-scale enterprise environments.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with existing infrastructure.

In industries ranging from large corporations to local banks, OpenText Identity Manager supports account provisioning and access management, primarily through Active Directory integration. By connecting with applications like Oracle, PeopleSoft, and Office 365, it facilitates lifecycle and compliance management. Its deployment aids training and real-world application with single sign-on options for internal applications, providing a comprehensive identity management solution for diverse environments.

OpenText

RSA SecurID provides world-leading two-factor authentication, protecting 25,000 organizations and 55 million users. RSA SecurID extends security to bring your own device (BYOD), cloud, and mobile as well as traditional virtual private network (VPN) and web portals. RSA SecurID solutions comprise three primary components: authenticator, platform, and agents.

RSA

Sample Customers

Sheetz

NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Identity Manager vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Identity Manager vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Identity Manager vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Identity Manager vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle report.

See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.