OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #37, while Oracle is ranked #23. OpenText holds a 0.7% mindshare in FT, compared to Oracle’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

350 Views
284 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

1,532 Views
858 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText Business Process Testing and Oracle Application Testing Suite are leading competitors in the testing and automation market. Oracle Application Testing Suite generally has the upper hand due to its comprehensive test management and automation features, contributing to a complete solution.

Features: OpenText Business Process Testing allows non-technical users to participate in test automation and offers scalability and cross-technology diversity. It supports seamless integration with existing systems, enhancing workflow management with simplicity for non-technical testers. Oracle Application Testing Suite includes advanced automation and load testing capabilities, with strong integration for Oracle applications. It provides features like OpenScript for automation, Oracle Load Testing, and a centralized management tool, offering detailed reporting and script reuse.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Business Process Testing could enhance its automation capabilities and may improve in areas requiring less technical investment compared to competitors. It might also expand its feature set for more comprehensive testing. Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by offering a simpler setup process, especially for organizations not deeply embedded in Oracle ecosystems. It could provide more user-friendly features for non-Oracle environments and refine its resource-intensive nature.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Business Process Testing is known for straightforward deployment due to its efficient integration with current business processes. Its deployment is typically quick, allowing users to implement tests efficiently. Oracle Application Testing Suite may present a more complex deployment initiative; however, it benefits from extensive Oracle support, balancing its complexity with in-depth customer service options.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Business Process Testing is often perceived as more cost-effective upfront, appealing to businesses focused on rapid integration rather than extending automation capabilities. Oracle Application Testing Suite, although associated with higher initial costs, is seen as delivering a better long-term ROI through its expansive features and comprehensive testing capabilities, making the investment worthwhile over time.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

37th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

23rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (15th), Load Testing Tools (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Application Testing Suite	1.6%
OpenText Business Processing Testing	0.7%
Other	97.7%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"The graphics are very intuitive and it's very easy to get scale of development."

"OpenScript has many features that make it useful, including the ability to record and playback."

"We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

"The solution is scalable."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

"The most valuable feature is the object identification feature."

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

"User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"Licensing policies could be more intuitive."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite does encounter some lag. When I am trying to record something, the tool gets stuck."

"I would like to see better dashboards."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

"Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac."

"If there's a feature we want in OATS that's missing and we report that to Oracle, it takes a long time."

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Government

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 50% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 50% of the time

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 6% of the time

SoftLogica WAPT Pro vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 6% of the time

Perfecto vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

January 2026

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

January 2026

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

OATS

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

OpenText

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

January 2026

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.