We performed a comparison between OneTouch AT Network Assistant and Wireshark based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetAlly, Wireshark, Auvik and others in Network Troubleshooting."OneTouch is easy to set up. You just plug it in, enter your details, and off you go. It only takes a few minutes as long as you've got Link-Live access or network access."
"The product is simple to implement."
"The solution is easy to install and use."
"Wireshark helps us to understand network traffic."
"Setup is very easy. It's also possible to change source code and compile if you want to change something in the code, because it's free."
"Wireshark is a good tool to start with network analyzing and packet capturing."
"The ability to decrypt traffic and the abundance of filters available are both valuable features."
"The initial setup is simple."
"The most valuable feature of Wireshark is the ability to choose a destination of flow that has not been working as expected."
"It is also limited in the number of IP targets you can test. If you want to test how many hops or different sites, you should be able to hit a test button and say, "Right then, test these 20 IP addresses to see if I can reach them." It only does up to 10. Most of NetAlly's other devices, like the G2, can do unlimited addresses."
"Wireshark is restricted when any sort of encryption is involved, such as XSL encryption or DLX."
"With Wireshark, you cannot download and utilize the packet in automation."
"Wireshark could make the filtering rules easier to apply and offer a drag-and-drop option as opposed to type and text."
"You need good network connectivity to download during the setup, otherwise, it might take a while."
"Wireshark could be improved with a delay option when getting data automatically."
"We'd like to be able to extract the output into an Excel table."
"The decryption of encrypted packets could be better."
"Wireshark is similar to an OS defense tool, meaning that it runs on an OS such as Ubuntu and Fedora, but I'm unsure if it's compatible with Windows or if it's a straightforward process to run it on Windows. Right now, my team needs to run Wireshark from a dongle to use it, so it's an OS-dependable tool, and that's an area for improvement. I was unable to use Wireshark on Windows, and I couldn't capture it, as I'm unsure how to configure the wireless card into monitoring mode on Windows. The process was straightforward on Linux, but it wasn't the case on Windows OS. It seems Wireshark isn't compatible with all OS. For example, you can analyze the log, and you can analyze it on the Windows server, but you can't do a capture in Windows. Configuring Wireshark for Windows isn't as easy as configuring it for Linux."
OneTouch AT Network Assistant is ranked 12th in Network Troubleshooting with 6 reviews while Wireshark is ranked 3rd in Network Troubleshooting with 61 reviews. OneTouch AT Network Assistant is rated 9.0, while Wireshark is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of OneTouch AT Network Assistant writes "It's a simple entry-level tool that's easy to set up, but it has some limitations on speed and IP targets". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wireshark writes "User-friendly with an easy setup and a nice interface". OneTouch AT Network Assistant is most compared with LinkRunner, whereas Wireshark is most compared with Zabbix, Nagios XI, SolarWinds NPM, ClearSight Analyzer and Microsoft Network Monitor.
See our list of best Network Troubleshooting vendors.
We monitor all Network Troubleshooting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
