LinkRunner vs OneTouch AT Network Assistant comparison

LinkRunner and OneTouch AT Network Assistant are both solutions in the Network Troubleshooting category. LinkRunner is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0, while OneTouch AT Network Assistant is ranked #13. LinkRunner holds a 17.3% mindshare in NT, compared to OneTouch AT Network Assistant’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of LinkRunner users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OneTouch AT Network Assistant users who would recommend it.

LinkRunner

Read 20 LinkRunner reviews

2,398 Views
256 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OneTouch AT Network Assistant

Read 6 OneTouch AT Network Assistant reviews

187 Views
82 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LinkRunner

OneTouch AT Network Assistant

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 11, 2024

OneTouch AT Network Assistant and LinkRunner are two competing network diagnostic tools. LinkRunner appears to have the upper hand due to its superior features, despite its higher cost.

Features:OneTouch AT Network Assistant is recognized for its comprehensive diagnostic capabilities, real-time troubleshooting, and budget-friendly nature. LinkRunner is known for its detailed network visibility, integration with other diagnostic tools, and bonus advanced features.

Room for Improvement:OneTouch AT Network Assistant could improve speed, add more advanced diagnostic tools, and offer better real-time responsiveness. LinkRunner needs better battery life, more intuitive data interpretation features, and refinement in firmware updates.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:OneTouch AT Network Assistant is easy to deploy and has responsive customer service. LinkRunner is also easy to deploy but lacks the same level of customer support, while compensating with robust features.

Pricing and ROI:OneTouch AT Network Assistant is more budget-friendly, providing a satisfactory ROI with fewer features. LinkRunner has a higher initial setup cost but users find the ROI justified by its advanced functionalities and integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed LinkRunner vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LinkRunner vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LinkRunner

Ranking in Network Troubleshooting

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OneTouch AT Network Assistant

Ranking in Network Troubleshooting

13th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Troubleshooting category, the mindshare of LinkRunner is 17.3%, down from 23.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OneTouch AT Network Assistant is 2.3%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Troubleshooting

Featured Reviews

Jesse_B

Manager of networks and infrastructure at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees

Impressive ease of use, gives comprehensive results in seconds, and saves a lot of time and resources

I've found the VLAN test feature to be most valuable. That's because not many devices do VLAN tests. Normally, I have to send a center technician to check a line and see if it's alive. If it's working, then I have to send a network technician out to log into a switch and see which port it's on and on which VLAN that port is. That's two persons and two separate visits. This device does all of this in a matter of seconds, and that has saved me a lot of time, troubleshooting, and resources. Its ease of use is very impressive. LinkRunner allows me to have my technicians run tests that are normally too complex and require a network specialist. AutoTest works with just one click. AutoTest does a lot of testing that would normally require a network specialist to log in to a switch and check out VLAN based on a port. My technicians don't have to log in to the switch anymore. They can just do AutoTest and information is provided online. So, I no longer have to send a specialist. I can have my technician run these very complex tests. It saves me on resources, time, and site visits. When it comes to troubleshooting, based on my experience, it has given very useful and very helpful information, especially for my field technicians. It has reduced my visits and the amount of presence because it gives a very comprehensive report on your network tests. It tests multiple variables and multiple parameters and gives a very informative report that makes it easy to pinpoint what is the root cause. There are many tools in this one solution. It's basically a bunch of toolkits or tool sets in one device, which makes it very powerful testing equipment.

Read full review

JamesStout

IT Director at JVS Consulting

It's a simple entry-level tool that's easy to set up, but it has some limitations on speed and IP targets

OneTouch is an entry-level testing tool that's coming to the end of its life, I believe, so it has limitations. For example, it can only test up to 1 gig of network speed. It would be helpful if they increased that to 10 gigs. It is also limited in the number of IP targets you can test. If you want to test how many hops or different sites, you should be able to hit a test button and say, "Right then, test these 20 IP addresses to see if I can reach them." It only does up to 10. Most of NetAlly's other devices, like the G2, can do unlimited addresses.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Performance testing is the most valuable feature. It gives a brief summary of the information we're looking at, such as latency, jitter, and the available throughput."

"The auto-test feature is vital and does 90 percent of what I need on its own. It's fast and I can get there in just a few clicks. It does a good job and tells me everything I need to know. LinkRunner works pretty quickly and always seems to be accurate."

"The solution's ability to simplify network validation and configuration of copper and fiber Ethernet networks is very useful to me. Otherwise, I’m guessing. Having a tool that I can trust doesn't solve all problems, but for the problems it solves, I can trust that it has told me “yes” or “no.” I would rate it highly for that."

"In terms of documenting ad hoc additions and other changes to wired ethernet connections, this product is very good. It keeps the information in the cloud and I have the ability to name it. This makes it very nice and easy to see."

"The LLDP decoding is better than on some of the other devices that we've used. Specifically, it goes beyond the minimum of the LLDP data to decode, and it shows the LLDP port descriptions. That makes it vastly simpler to identify which port you're connecting to on a switch that's patched back to some other building, rather than having to figure out an SNMP index or something else."

"It is fast in providing results. It is pretty accurate."

"The AutoTest feature makes it easy for you on both ends. It's an excellent feature, especially if you're by yourself. You plug one end in and you hit AutoTest. It sits and waits for you to plug in the other end and it starts testing."

"I've found the VLAN test feature to be most valuable. That's because not many devices do VLAN tests. Normally, I have to send a center technician to check a line and see if it's alive. If it's working, then I have to send a network technician out to log into a switch and see which port it's on and on which VLAN that port is. That's two persons and two separate visits. This device does all of this in a matter of seconds, and that has saved me a lot of time, troubleshooting, and resources."

Cons

"One area where LinkRunner could be improved is the battery life. Depending on which tests are run, it gets a decent six to eight hours. However, sometimes we need to do back-to-back shifts to meet a deadline, and we need access to an outlet to keep it plugged in and charging. It takes about an hour or two to charge."

"If it weren't for the battery, it would probably get an eight out of 10. But because of the battery, it's infuriating and it's not reliable."

"It's a little bit tough getting used to at first, but once you get the hang of it, and once you start using it more, like anything, it gets easier. The difficult part, at first, is knowing where to find each test and how to use the tests."

"I wish they had software that could create continuous streams of traffic. I'm not sure if that's possible with LinkRunner, but it would be very helpful in some of the test case scenarios that clients are looking for, in regards to quality of service"

"One of the things I'd like to see in future versions of LinkRunner is a wireless dongle embedded into the product so that I don't need to have a separate wireless dongle. It should be built into that."

"They should allow firmware updates even if you don't have an AllyCare contract. I'm in a situation right now where they've released firmware for bug fixes, but we cannot access those, which makes the device almost useless. You almost want to just throw it out the window because they're not supporting their product unless you have an AllyCare contract."

"It runs tests quickly, but it takes a while to boot up. It's somewhat disappointing that LinkRunner takes some time to turn on. When I arrive in the space, I usually spend the first two minutes waiting."

"It is a great tool, but in the long-term, they can make its processor more powerful to do more functions. They can upgrade the hardware to make it run faster and more efficiently from the process point of view. That'll be beneficial because the technology is evolving and the network traffic is going higher and higher. We have to leverage better spec products to handle the traffic load."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The area where the product could be improved is by having a lower cost so that I could have more than one. The price is competitive, but everybody would always like to see the price go down. I'd buy another one if it were cheaper."

"They offer one price. I do like paying for support because I get software updates that way."

"Its pricing is all right. Of course, from the business point of view, the cheaper it is, the better it is, but I prefer to spend a bit more money to get a quick response, which is helpful especially when we are onsite or in a very critical situation. We are not only paying for the product. We are paying for the people behind the product in terms of developers and technical support. When you need some help, they will be behind it, and they'll support you. There are no additional costs other than the standard licensing fee."

"We... decided to go with NetAlly for the price and the bang for the buck."

"It's reasonably priced in my market. It provides good value for money. The device is competitively priced as compared to other solutions. It gives you a lot of functionality and saves you a lot of time and resources. I see it as a good buy and good value for money. I stand for it."

"It was difficult to sell this to my management because the price is really high compared to other testing tools. However, we've seen a pretty good return on investment considering our outcomes and the time we have saved. The first year has been great."

"The 10Gig ones are quite expensive, and we have only two of them, but I know that this option was cheaper than the other 10Gig option we looked at, and we're very happy with it."

"It's expensive but you definitely get what you pay for. I would buy another one if I had to."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

NetAlly EtherScope nXG vs LinkRunner

Compared 30% of the time

IxChariot vs LinkRunner

Compared 25% of the time

LinkSprinter vs LinkRunner

Compared 23% of the time

AirCheck G3 vs LinkRunner

Compared 14% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LinkRunner

June 2025

Download LinkRunner product report

Buyer's Guide

OneTouch AT Network Assistant

May 2025

Download OneTouch AT Network Assistant product report

Overview

LinkRunner AT 3000 & 4000. Next Generation Copper and Fiber Ethernet AutoTester. Fast and comprehensive validation of network links and powerful copper and fiber network connectivity troubleshooting. Tests from 10Mbps to 10Gbps, PoE, VLAN, switch port, path analysis, packet capture, topology mapping and so much more!

NetAlly

The OneTouch AT Network Assistant is an automated All-in-one network tester for Ethernet and Wi-Fi troubleshooting and performance validation. The OneTouch AT troubleshoots desktop SIP/SCCP based VoIP problems in real-time with inline call monitoring, logging, and scoring. The OneTouch AT can automatically discover Wi-Fi devices and key device properties, including new 802.11ac access point and clients.

NetAlly

Sample Customers

Philips Healthcare, HCA Healthcare, University of South Dakota, Memorial Hermann, Baltimore County Public Schools, Aaramrak.

Disney, Carnival Cruise Line, Solarity Credit Union, Del Monte Foods, Lung Bioengineering, Peterbilt Motors Company,Port Angeles School District, Philips Healthcare, Denver University

Buyer's Guide

LinkRunner vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant

June 2025

Free Report: LinkRunner vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant

Find out what your peers are saying about LinkRunner vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LinkRunner vs. OneTouch AT Network Assistant report.

See our list of best Network Troubleshooting vendors.

We monitor all Network Troubleshooting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.