No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

NinjaOne vs TeamDynamix comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NinjaOne
Ranking in Help Desk Software
9th
Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (21st), Server Monitoring (5th), Remote Access (10th), Vulnerability Management (27th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (4th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (11th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (1st), Patch Management (6th), MSP Backup (1st), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (7th)
TeamDynamix
Ranking in Help Desk Software
34th
Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)
26th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (54th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category, the mindshare of NinjaOne is 1.9%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamDynamix is 1.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Service Management (ITSM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
NinjaOne1.9%
TeamDynamix1.8%
Other96.3%
IT Service Management (ITSM)
 

Featured Reviews

Not Joseph Pearson - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant Vice President, Tech Solutions at LPL Financials
Has simplified remote software delivery and script management but needs improved reporting flexibility and better Mac support
NinjaOne's best features include ease of use regarding enablement and deployment, a broad selection and ability of software enablement, and API deliveries. Using CrowdStrike, we are able to tie in NinjaOne's API to have these automatically deliver to endpoints upon addition of those devices to a group with that policy deployed to it. NinjaOne has positively impacted our organization by making delivery easier for our end users and improving the ability to create scripts, manage scripts, and check status of devices and their compliance. This easier delivery with NinjaOne gives us oversight on devices without having to be on the call or remoted in directly to a device.
Use TeamDynamix?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
University
17%
Government
10%
Construction Company
10%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise4
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NinjaOne?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I think it is very reasonable for the product that we get.
What needs improvement with NinjaOne?
NinjaOne can be improved by making mobile usage on the system cheaper because it becomes an expensive commodity.
What is your primary use case for NinjaOne?
My main use case for NinjaOne is patching operating systems and applications. I use NinjaOne for patching security vulnerabilities and ensuring that everything is kept up to date on the network for...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
TeamDynamix IT Service Management
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Status Pros, Mitchell and Company
Sunnyvale, University of Michigan, Nutrabolt, The Gratz Bank, Avondale, Covenant Health, Shaner, Raymour & Flanigan
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, ManageEngine and others in IT Service Management (ITSM). Updated: March 2026.
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.