NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] comparison

Nakivo and Quest Software are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Additionally, 99% of Nakivo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Read 94 NAKIVO Backup & Replication reviews

7,602 Views
6,234 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Read 20 Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] reviews

90% willing to recommend

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 8, 2026

Quest Rapid Recovery and NAKIVO Backup & Replication compete in the backup and recovery software category. NAKIVO appears to have the upper hand due to its affordability and a comprehensive range of features.

Features: Quest Rapid Recovery is recognized for its granular recovery options, ease of use, and ability to restore servers within minutes. It supports both physical and virtual server backups and allows mounting backups as drives. NAKIVO Backup & Replication offers strong ransomware protection, email recovery, and a user-friendly interface. It supports multiple environments like VMware, Hyper-V, and cloud storage.

Room for Improvement: Quest Rapid Recovery needs enhancements in GUI lag, support for Mac clients and tape backups, and better snapshot retention management in Hyper-V environments. Users also call for improved space management and faster technical support. NAKIVO users suggest enhanced reporting, UI refinements, better integration with other virtual environments, and more comprehensive cloud provider support. NAKIVO's deduplication and encryption functions also require optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Quest Rapid Recovery is mostly deployed on-premises and is praised for competent technical support, though response times are inconsistent. NAKIVO Backup & Replication provides hybrid and on-premises deployment options, noted for its straightforward setup and cost-effectiveness. Despite mixed reviews, NAKIVO's customer support is regarded as efficient and responsive.

Pricing and ROI: Quest Rapid Recovery is considered expensive, especially when additional storage or features are needed. However, users still find value in its data recovery capabilities. NAKIVO Backup & Replication is praised for its cost-effectiveness and clear licensing model, making it attractive for smaller businesses. Both products deliver ROI based on security and reliability rather than direct financial savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (13th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (11th)

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

EDERLEY TERRERO

Business Consulting at Gestion IT

Robust data protection has safeguarded mailboxes and disaster recovery for our clients

NAKIVO Backup & Replication has released many updates lately and at this point it works excellently. Needs will always appear, particularly around the AI topic and other things that come out over time. I understand that solutions always have to keep moving forward, but so far I see it as excellent.I give it a nine because nothing is perfect. There are always solutions, and NAKIVO Backup & Replication is a tool that adapts perfectly to certain needs. However, we cannot dismiss that there are powerful solutions on the market that have been around for much longer. I rate it a nine because we can always improve.

Read full review

Adam Augustín

Country Manager at Prianto Ltd

Granular recovery, replication is good and offers good speed

It is for any kind of company that uses their own servers. From a global perspective, our clients are small-sized companies. All the SMEs, compared to the Slovakian market, are quite small. It's a small market with small companies. They just want to enhance security and follow regulations It's…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This product has helped to centralize backups and made it easy to recover data."

"Since we started using Nakivo Backup and Replication, we can perform operations that would be very expensive using a VMware license, for a very very affordable price."

"We were looking for a product that is easy and simple to use, this product perfectly fit and ended up becoming a mainstay in our portfolio of products that we can't live without."

"It is a cost-effective solution with an easy-to-configure user-friendly interface."

"It helps to sell Nakivo products when outstanding support is provided and its well-performing software easily beats competitors."

"The price is much lower than competitors that do the same function."

"The most valuable feature is the support, as it is directly from Nakivo and it is possible to send a support request that contains all of the technical data on the environment, as well as the software, required for the answer."

"Most valuable for DimenXional Cloud is the API provided by Nakivo which allows us to implement the software in all types of solutions."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pros

"The fact that it can take a snapshot of everything on a server and replicate it on another server in real-time is the most valuable feature."

"It has surpassed our expectations time and time again."

"Built-in encryption helps to secure our data as it travels from our on-site server to our off-site backup server."

"The local mount utility is most valuable. I do restores fairly regularly. Thankfully, I have not ever lost an entire server that I've had to resurrect, but I certainly have people who erroneously saved over a file or have deleted a file. So, we've done that quite a bit. We still have the DL4000 appliance, and we had, kind of, extrapolated that out over a five-year period. Now, we're in year six, so we had to add storage, which we did as a SAN next to DL4000, but prior to adding in that extra storage, we, here and there, would run into situations where for whatever reason, it would want to be pulling a new base image, and then we would run out of storage. So, we would utilize the archive feature and archive the old data that we want to hang on to, but we don't necessarily need it taking up current data storage. Being able to export out really old data is most valuable to us. Then, we just store that on a NAS that we keep in another building."

"The compression and deduplication features have helped to save on storage costs."

"Customer Service: So far, I've found both the online forums and Dell Community pages and the Dell knowledge base pretty extensive, and all our direct support with Dell techs has been quick and so far very helpful."

"It is very easy to use and very easy to manage. The fact that I can easily recover data is valuable. I don't use it much. The only way I have been using it is that sometimes, people ask to recover the data, which is a very easy process. It takes only a few minutes to get in and get the data from the server."

"It is very easy to use, and it saves hours on each restore."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] pros

Cons

"In the loading of a backup, choosing what to restore seems to be a lengthy process, but it has always worked in my restore tests."

"Log and report creation can be improved."

"There is a familiar error that pops up and that is a VM error as much as it is a Nakivo error. It says that the job couldn't calm the VM and restores might be impacted. That error is, to say the least, a bit scary. I have seen this type of error on other backup systems also."

"In the press releases, it would be useful to make sure that the manual space reclaim procedure does not have to be performed but that it happens automatically, thus optimizing the use of space."

"Nakivo's implementation documentation could use a little beefing up."

"Personally, I would like to have the ability to backup older legacy systems on the new versions as well."

"The backup speed needs improvement."

"Compression and data deduplication are okay, but they could be improved."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication cons

"It's not really Quest's fault, but the only issue that I had during the time when I was doing a lot of our restores is whenever the server reboots, it has to bring all of the repositories back in again, which takes around five to six hours to pull eight terabytes back in again."

"I think the self-paced learning and knowledge base can always be improved so that users can self-service without having to contact either a reseller or Quest. I know there are things that I would have been looking for to try and solve. And the only way I could get there was to actually open a ticket rather than go through self-service through the portal."

"Sometimes, when we have certain batches for Windows, it needs to be restarted. When it's restarted, the service is configured as a delayed start. Sometimes, you need to wait too long until it rights itself, or you have to do it manually."

"The terminology didn't seem easily available. When I go to the website, it is hard to search for things. You get all the articles, then you finally get the search button. They need the search at the top of the knowledge base. Then, on occasion, if you get an error message in the system, which is very important, it says, "Click here for more information," but I never get more information. The search engine doesn't find it or it is some weird error. It has never worked for me."

"GUI response time has a LOT of lag, although in all fairness it might be due to us running more clients than we should on the server."

"It's very expensive which is why I want to drop it."

"For the most part, it is really good in terms of flexibility and choice of recovery methods. What we found lacking was being able to back up virtual volumes that are clustered. We ran out of luck there. There should be an option for backing up clustered virtual volumes."

"It is expensive. If you do not need physical backups, it is expensive for basic virtual backups."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is adequate for its features and quality."

"Nakivo Backup & Replication also have another great value, which is that it is one of the lowest prices on the market."

"Nakivo is cheaper per machine and per backup."

"This product is cheaper than other big rivals."

"It has a much higher bang for the buck than other products we evaluated."

"As a free solution for a small environment, this is a great solution!"

"Nakivo has a good price-performance ratio."

"Regarding the licensing, I would advise speaking to the Nakivo representatives and you can get the best option for your environment."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pricing and cost advice

"When I purchased the change to the license, it was $1,600. I think that was for changing the license. I don't believe that I had to purchase technical support in a while, so I must've bought maybe for five years, but I don't feel there was a huge cost involved in technical support. Its cost was definitely worth it because we've had a fantastic experience with them."

"Its price is okay. It is reasonable in terms of the way it works."

"I believe the basic license comes with six terabytes, whereas a lot of the other ones are four terabytes. From the price point, it seemed a lot better than the comparative models, such as Datto, Barracuda, and some of the others. I believe Barracuda was about $15,000 for four terabytes, and Quest was around $12,000 for six terabytes. Pricing is based on the period. There is just the maintenance fee that you have to pay annually, or you can pay for a three-year or four-year contract. This includes Premier Support."

"I don't think the licensing for the product is very expensive."

"The pricing is on the higher end."

"It's very expensive which is why I want to drop it. They charge us per core and we have a six-core server. It's expensive to pay for maintenance charges. I want to switch to something cheaper."

"It is a little expensive. However, I haven't compared it to other solutions. Being a nonprofit, it is always good to have nonprofit discounts on products."

"Licensing fees are based on the amount of data that you want to store, which is related to how many customers you want to cover."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

How does Nakivo compare with Veeam Backup & Replication?

Nakivo is my favorite backup software. Below are the main benefits of Nakivo compared to Veeam 1. Low cost. 2. Backup storage with global deduplication (this is the main requirement of a backup sol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nakivo?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows that NAKIVO Backup & Replication is more price-efficient than other solutions, and we are satisfied with the pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nakivo?

Improving NAKIVO Backup & Replication involves addressing the hassle of choosing the right license level when starting out, especially with specific requirements, and the lack of macOS support ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest Rapid Recovery?

Dell solutions are approximately 30% to 35% more expensive than Veeam.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest Rapid Recovery?

The product is expensive.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest Rapid Recovery?

We have sold some of the products to our customers, mainly to remove competitors like Veeam and also other appliances that do not have the whole package integrated into just one appliance.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 9% of the time

Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 6% of the time

Rubrik vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

BDRShield vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication Competitors

NetVault Plus vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Iron Mountain Connect vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Unitrends vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

July 2026

Download NAKIVO Backup & Replication product report

Buyer's Guide

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

July 2026

Download Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] product report

Also Known As

No data available

Dell AppAssure

Overview

NAKIVO Backup & Replication delivers rapid deployment and intuitive management across environments like Windows, Linux, and NAS. It is known for fast VM recovery, robust data protection, and cloud integration with competitive pricing.

NAKIVO Backup & Replication supports diverse IT landscapes, offering efficient deduplication, offsite backups, and policy-based replication. Its granular file restores, effective compression, and seamless cloud integration make it a preferred choice for minimizing downtime and enhancing business resilience. Users highlight its security measures, flexible deployment options, and automatic backups as core strengths. However, further enhancements in interface refinement, storage array integrations, and broadened support for virtual technologies and physical machine backups could enhance user satisfaction. Users seek improved control over alerts, better reporting capabilities, and optimized deduplication and compression.

What are the key features of NAKIVO Backup & Replication?

Fast VM Recovery: Minimal downtime with quick restore options for virtual machines.
Deduplication & Compression: Efficient data storage through advanced deduplication techniques and compression.
Cloud Integration: Seamless operations with cloud platforms like AWS for flexible backup solutions.
Policy-Based Replication: Automated replication policies ensuring consistent and reliable data backup.
Granular File Restores: Restore specific files without needing full system recovery, saving time and resources.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating NAKIVO Backup & Replication?

Competitive Pricing: Cost-effective solution with robust features.
Ease of Use: Intuitive management for a hassle-free experience.
Reliable Performance: Consistent results in protecting and recovering data.
Strong Support: Responsive customer service catering to user needs.

In industries like technology and finance, NAKIVO Backup & Replication is essential for securing virtual environments such as VMware and Hyper-V. Its deployment on NAS devices and capability for offsite backups to cloud platforms like AWS are appreciated. Organizations utilize it for backup, replication, and recovery of virtual machines using daily and incremental methods, ensuring efficient data protection and disaster recovery processes.

Nakivo

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] provides easy-to-use backup and recovery capabilities, emphasizing granular recovery and point-in-time restoration with simple installation, data replication, and user-friendly navigation.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] helps manage infrastructure environments with features supporting disk backup, archiving, VM standby, and replication. Despite limitations like sluggish GUI, lack of support for tape and Mac, and high memory use, users appreciate its real-time data replication and strong reliability. The tool is employed in on-prem deployments and aids in disaster recovery, protecting data across cloud and on-premise servers, securing databases, and facilitating quick recovery during failures.

What are Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]'s key features?

Ease of Use: Simplifies operations with a user-friendly interface.
Granular Recovery: Allows detailed data retrieval.
Point-in-Time Restoration: Enables specific time data recovery.
Real-time Replication: Ensures up-to-date data replication.
Compression and Deduplication: Streamlines data management.

What benefits can users expect from Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]?

Improved Storage Efficiency: Enhanced by archiving and disk backup support.
Flexibility: Utilizing VM standby and replication features.
Reliability: Offers fast emergency recovery with minimal admin burden.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] is integral for industries requiring robust data protection, encompassing crucial server and database backups in compliance-focused environments with SQL databases and Hyper-V hosts, ensuring swift and dependable recovery solutions.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Coca Cola, Honda, 3M, University of Arizona, University of Maryland, University of Arkansas, Johns Hopkins University, Marriott, Radisson Hotels and Resorts, Fujifilm, Eiffage

PRIME aerostructures GmbH, Tamworth Regional Council, Rhondda Housing Association, Stadtwerke Pforzheim GmbH & Co., Guangdong Aiyingdao Childrens Department Store, Nspyre, Tarrant Technology Partners, CloudRunner

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.