N-able EDR vs SonicWall Capture Client comparison

N-able and SonicWall are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. N-able is ranked #48 with an average rating of 7.5, while SonicWall is ranked #43 with an average rating of 8.0. N-able holds a 0.4% mindshare in EDR, compared to SonicWall’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SonicWall users who would recommend it.

N-able EDR

Read 4 N-able EDR reviews

665 Views
645 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SonicWall Capture Client

Read 11 SonicWall Capture Client reviews

1,604 Views
1,075 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

N-able EDR

SonicWall Capture Client

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Both SonicWall Capture Client and N-able EDR provide robust endpoint security solutions. SonicWall Capture Client offers better pricing and support based on user reviews, while N-able EDR is praised for its features, making it worth the price despite higher costs.

Features: SonicWall Capture Client is recognized for comprehensive protection, integration capabilities, and ease of use. N-able EDR is known for advanced threat detection, response features, and customizable policies. Users find N-able EDR's features more valuable, giving it an edge in this category.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest SonicWall Capture Client could improve its reporting features and achieve better integration with other security tools. For N-able EDR, users indicate the need for a simpler management console and enhanced scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonicWall Capture Client receives positive feedback for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. N-able EDR is also recognized for its ease of deployment, though users occasionally encounter support delays.

Pricing and ROI: SonicWall Capture Client is favored for its competitive pricing and quick realization of ROI. N-able EDR, while more expensive, is perceived as valuable due to its extensive features, with users acknowledging it as a justified investment.

To learn more, read our detailed N-able EDR vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. SonicWall Capture Client

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N-able EDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

48th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonicWall Capture Client

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

43rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (45th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of N-able EDR is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonicWall Capture Client is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SonicWall Capture Client	0.6%
N-able EDR	0.4%
Other	99.0%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Yazan Albaw

Customer Success Director at We Cybers

N-able EDR SentinelOne delivers advanced endpoint protection through real-time threat detection, automated response, and comprehensive visibility to safeguard against cyber threats.

N-able EDR SentinelOne is renowned for its exceptional detection and protection capabilities, ranked number one by Gartner and MITRE ATT&CK. It offers robust defense against various threats, including malware, fileless attacks, phishing, and insider threats. The solution excels in identifying suspicious behavior and promptly notifying engineers of potential threats. A key feature is its auto-response capability. You can configure automatic responses to threats, which significantly reduces the time and effort required to manage incidents. Enhanced by machine learning, these automated responses are both efficient and adaptive. Additionally, N-able EDR integrates seamlessly with RMM (Remote Monitoring and Management), allowing us to monitor EDR performance, detect failures, and oversee network performance from a single, unified dashboard. This integration streamlines management and enhances overall efficiency.

Read full review

Hesdi Triantono

Product Manager at wahana piranti teknologi

Has consistently delivered double-layer protection and simplified policy application while needing mobile compatibility and better MacOS support

A significant limitation is that SonicWall Capture Client cannot be installed on smartphones, as there is no mobile version available.Occasionally, the Sentinel engine becomes unresponsive, particularly when customers do not properly restart or shutdown their systems. This requires a hard restart after installation to resolve the issue. Installation on Mac OS can be challenging, requiring multiple attempts due to version compatibility requirements. We must ensure the SonicWall Capture Client version is stable for Mac OS. The RAM usage is higher compared to SentinelOne, utilizing approximately 150 megabytes of memory. This is a common concern from customers, and reducing RAM consumption would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have been using this solution for quite some time, and the AI functionality is quite advanced; we are able to provide insights on different aspects and read the reports easily."

"It provides visibility and a storyline to track the virus or malware's activities, showing infected processes and changes made."

"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"The most valuable features of SonicWall Capture Client are CSC (Capture Security Center), RTDMI (Real-Time Deep Memory Inspection), and the deep memory inspection feature."

"Considering other products, SonicWall Capture Client has two differentiators."

"SonicWall Capture Client's scalability is nice."

"SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike."

"SonicWall Capture Client provides dual protection through two multi-engines: SonicWall Capture Client sandboxing and SentinelOne agent, with features like content blocking, real-time 24/7 protection without signature updates, and advanced machine learning that eliminates concerns about manual updates, making it more protective and easier to deploy."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The solution serves as a very stable platform."

"Overall, what I love the most about SonicWall Capture Client is its management console. SonicWall Capture Client also has the intelligence to tell you which computer is online, what OS it uses, etc. I also found the rollback feature and SentinelOne integration valuable in SonicWall Capture Client. Rollback is a powerful feature of the solution because it's similar to locking your endpoint during an attack, so you won't have to pay the hackers, particularly during ransomware attacks. That feature in SonicWall Capture Client allows you to get back your endpoint or make your endpoint right again after an attack. I also like that it isn't complex to remove the engine error from the endpoint because you only have to provide the security key from SonicWall Capture Client, so the process is simple. It's not complex."

More SonicWall Capture Client pros

Cons

"With pricing, they can improve by bundling their pricing because sometimes billing comes in a very long process."

"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."

"Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"I would like to see them add support for both Android and iOS smartphones."

"I would rate the scalability as seven out of ten. The capability is useful. Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"An area for improvement in SonicWall Capture Client is TenantCloud support. Suppose you want to implement SonicWall Capture Client. You'll have to register it on MySonicWall. Then once your SonicWall Capture Client license expires and you don't want to renew it, you can't delete it from your MySonicWall account, so that's an area for improvement."

"Technical support from SonicWall has room for improvement. While their escalation process is understandable, it can be time-consuming as all logs need to be provided multiple times across different service levels."

"XDR cannot be used unless MDR services are purchased with SonicWall."

"The vulnerability reports need to be better. Windows Defender detected some issues that SonicWall Capture Client couldn't."

"Occasionally, the Sentinel engine becomes unresponsive, particularly when customers do not properly restart or shutdown their systems."

"The biggest issue with SonicWall Capture Client is network latency."

"SonicWall Capture Client should use less of our PC's memory, as it tends to slow down the performance."

"SonicWall Capture Client could be made a little lighter than it currently is in terms of memory consumption."

More SonicWall Capture Client cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is average."

"The product is very expensive."

"You have to pay for the solution, and a lot of customers do not want to pay."

"Here in Indonesia, SonicWall Capture Client costs five hundred thousand rupiahs for every endpoint. If I'm correct, you only have to pay the licensing fee, and there's no additional fee. To me, the pricing for SonicWall Capture Client is four out of five."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Healthcare Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

12%

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with N-able EDR?

With pricing, they can improve by bundling their pricing because sometimes billing comes in a very long process. If they could bundle it as one solution and show the capabilities or features, they ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able EDR?

We are using N-able EDR, but I think Sophos makes sense because of the environment we operate in. The localization and different elements were important factors we were looking at. They have their ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able EDR?

I am more focused on operations and procurement. The decision to use this solution was made before I joined the company. It started with patch management systems and progressed into EDR, backup mon...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SonicWall Capture Client?

It is not similar to other products. For XDR, users have to use another product. XDR cannot be used unless MDR services are purchased with SonicWall. If a user has SonicWall MDR services, then they...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SonicWall Capture Client?

I am a distributor, but I can be counted as a reseller. It does not differ anyway. Most of my clients are SMBs, and I inform them that they should protect their servers with this kind of product, n...

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs N-able EDR

Compared 25% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs N-able EDR

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 13% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs N-able EDR

Compared 12% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 10% of the time

More N-able EDR Competitors

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 17% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 10% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 8% of the time

More SonicWall Capture Client Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download N-able EDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

September 2025

Download SonicWall Capture Client product report

Overview

N-able EDR effectively safeguards against cybersecurity threats like malware and ransomware. With AI-driven capabilities and seamless integration with remote monitoring tools, it offers advanced protection and management for servers and workstations.

N-able EDR, known for its advanced defense mechanisms, utilizes AI and machine learning to enhance threat detection beyond traditional antivirus capabilities. It provides comprehensive visibility with its '360 vision,' integrating smoothly with remote management for unified performance monitoring. While it excels in protecting Windows environments, users seek improvements in mobile support and billing practices. A focus on enhancing licensing efficiency and reducing false positives could further enhance its usability. Ranked highly by Gartner and MITRE ATT&CK, N-able EDR remains a favored choice among users for its effective threat management and detailed reporting functionalities.

What are the key features of N-able EDR?

Rollback feature: Helps revert devices to previous states after an attack.
AI models: Improve threat detection using sophisticated algorithms.
Exceptional detection and protection: Offers robust defense against multiple threat vectors.
Auto-response capability: Uses machine learning for efficient incident management.
'360 vision': Provides complete visibility of device inventories.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Comprehensive security: Enhanced detection surpassing traditional antivirus.
Efficient monitoring: Unified device management through RMM integration.
Insightful reporting: Advanced reports provide critical security insights.
Inventory management: Full device oversight with '360 vision'.

In sectors reliant on Windows-based systems, N-able EDR is deployed as a primary antivirus solution. Its advanced AI and reporting features allow businesses to efficiently manage threat landscapes. However, while it secures servers and workstations, industries requiring mobile device support may find its current capabilities insufficient, prompting requests for broader platform integration.

N-able

SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple endpoint protection capabilities, including next-generation malware protection and application vulnerability intelligence. It leverages cloud sandbox file testing, comprehensive reporting, and enforcement for endpoint protection.

SonicWall

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Luton College

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. SonicWall Capture Client

September 2025

Free Report: N-able EDR vs. SonicWall Capture Client

Find out what your peers are saying about N-able EDR vs. SonicWall Capture Client and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N-able EDR vs. SonicWall Capture Client report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.