N-able Cove Data Protection vs Oracle Data Guard comparison

N-able and Oracle are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. N-able is ranked #34 with an average rating of 7.5, while Oracle is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.3. N-able holds a 1.2% mindshare in BRS, compared to Oracle’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

N-able Cove Data Protection

Read 23 N-able Cove Data Protection reviews

4,291 Views
2,403 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle Data Guard

Read 31 Oracle Data Guard reviews

2,063 Views
2,022 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

N-able Cove Data Protection

Oracle Data Guard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Oracle Data Guard and N-able Cove Data Protection compete in the data protection category. Oracle Data Guard seems to have the upper hand for enterprise-level data protection, while N-able Cove Data Protection is favored for its user-friendly approach and flexibility.

Features: Oracle Data Guard offers robust disaster recovery, data synchronization features, and advanced database protection capabilities. N-able Cove Data Protection provides comprehensive cloud backup solutions, simple data recovery processes, and flexibility that appeals to users.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Data Guard needs better integration with non-Oracle systems, a more intuitive setup process, and reduced complexity. N-able Cove Data Protection could improve reporting, enhance backup scheduling flexibility, and provide better reporting capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Data Guard has a complex deployment model requiring significant technical expertise but offers strong customer service. N-able Cove Data Protection features a simpler deployment process suitable for small to medium-sized businesses, though its customer service could be more responsive.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Data Guard tends to be more expensive with higher setup costs, justified by its advanced features suitable for large enterprises seeking high ROI in critical data environments. N-able Cove Data Protection offers a more cost-effective solution with quicker ROI for smaller organizations due to its lower setup costs and flexible pricing models.

To learn more, read our detailed N-able Cove Data Protection vs. Oracle Data Guard Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

N-able Cove Data Protection vs. Oracle Data Guard

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,360 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N-able Cove Data Protection

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

34th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (17th), SaaS Backup (8th), MSP Backup (3rd)

Oracle Data Guard

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

22nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of N-able Cove Data Protection is 1.2%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Data Guard is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Data Guard	0.9%
N-able Cove Data Protection	1.2%
Other	97.9%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Per MøllerJacobsen

Senior consultant at Azend A/S

Delivers cost-effective data backup with room for search improvements

The challenges I face especially are those I've mentioned, that finding some specific data in N-able Cove Data Protection is not as easy as it is in some other systems. You cannot just search for something—you need to know where it was and when it was there to restore it, plus it would be nice to take out data from Microsoft 365 in some portable format, which is currently not an option. I would like to extract the data from Microsoft 365 in a portable format, something like a database or maybe just to take out a PST file or SharePoint and Teams files to the file system. Especially in these times, where we discuss potential risks with the Microsoft cloud for European companies, companies would want to know how to access their data from the backup if they suddenly don't have a tenant. I believe there should be the ability to take out data from Microsoft 365 in a portable format. I know that Cohesity is working on making such a thing. It's not there yet; I asked last week for something for forensics, and the support team said it's not possible yet, but I know from our technical account manager they are working on some solutions.

Read full review

AbdulHameed

Assistant Vice President at ZTBL

Ensures high availability, disaster recovery, and data protection for Oracle databases through features like real-time data synchronization, automatic failover and zero data loss

Oracle Data Guard stands out by providing heavy-duty features that enable connecting multiple standby databases to a single production database. Oracle supports up to eight standby databases, offering a level of redundancy and scalability that other platforms cannot match. Implementing Oracle Data Guard ensures the protection and integrity of your data, even in the event of a disaster. With Data Guard, Oracle guarantees zero data loss, providing peace of mind for organizations relying on their data for critical operations. Data Guard offers multiple protection modes, each serving different needs. One such mode is active-active, where both the production and standby databases are actively accessible. In the event of a failure, seamless switchover occurs without disrupting client sessions, as they remain unaware of the transition between databases.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuables feature is the alerts and monitoring that catches the failed backups."

"It's their cloud, it's their storage. I don't have to buy a space on Amazon or Google's cloud and then use their software to push it. That works well for me. This way, I don't have to worry about another option or the opportunity that there might be a credential leak."

"The ease of use and the console are great."

"What I like the most about it's the ease of use and the reliability that it has when copying information to the cloud."

"I know I won't have an issue if the data is there. The reliability and the confidence that we have is amazing. It doesn't matter. We've had customers have ransomware. We've had customers that have had corruption. We've had customers that have had employees destroy their data. As long as it's been backed up, I know that I can get it back and I know I have nothing to worry about. Our confidence level is very high."

"It provides a single dashboard for all types of data protection, we monitor everything through a single dashboard. It simplifies everything overall. It allows us to see everything, whether passing or failing any issues, any problems through a single pane of glass that we don't have to click through or adjust as we go forward."

"It's extremely important that Cove provides cloud-based data protection with backup, disaster recovery, and archiving. That is a necessity for my insurance. As an IT company, my insurance would cost more if my backups were not offsite and off-network."

"We use a neat feature called VDR status, Virtual Disaster Recovery status. It only works on servers... It's automated. Once or twice a month it will virtually mount the backup and provide a screenshot and advise whether or not there have been any errors."

More N-able Cove Data Protection pros

"We have found the replication feature the most useful. We use this feature the most. The ability to recover a database with less effort and the use of Oracle Data Guard Broker to administer the complete environment are also very useful features."

"The most valuable aspect for me is undoubtedly the failover capability and the assurance of data safety provided by Oracle Data Guard."

"Backup and application continuity are most valuable."

"If you have a problem with your primary site and can't access your primary database, you can continue working with the database that you have as standby on the other site, by changing its role to primary."

"The most valuable features are the backup and restore. With this in place along with the clustering, the database is safe from hacking, hardware failure, power failures, and system crashes."

"We have not encountered any major challenges with replication. We were able to achieve near-real-time replication. Also, with the switchover failover, we were not getting any technical issues. It's a pretty stable product."

"Oracle Data Guard is a free solution. When you apply for Enterprise Manager, it comes for free with the solution."

"You can see how the logs are applied, check the apply time, and how far behind the standby is at any given time."

More Oracle Data Guard pros

Cons

"The challenges I face especially are those I've mentioned, that finding some specific data in N-able Cove Data Protection is not as easy as it is in some other systems."

"N-able Cove Data Protection does not provide a lot of SaaS backup products, which is an area they can improve. Additionally, there are some limitations on the storage side, where I cannot have a lot of employees backing up their data."

"We don't use the solution’s automated recovery testing because SolarWinds made me cross. When they released it, I went, "Oh, well, that's quite good." Because if you use the system, then it supposedly spins up, and on the portal, it gives you a screenshot of the booted device. So, I phoned up, and I said, "Oh, that's really quite cool. How much is that?" They said, "No, no, no. It's all included in your license." I went, "Okay then," and went and deployed it on about half the fleet. One of the options that our customers have is they can pay us a small amount every month for us to test the recovery just to prove that it's viable, and I thought, "Well, this will do that for us. Nice." Then, in the next invoice, we got a charge for it. While It was not a huge amount, I took offense at the fact that we were told that it would be a no extra cost option that was part of our license, but it turns out that it's chargeable. Therefore, we haven't used it since."

"A feature I'd like to see would be a more customizable admin console."

"N-able Cove Data Protection for Microsoft 365 is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."

"I have some issues with the agent failing on workstations. I've had to completely uninstall several of them, delete everything, and start over to get them to work."

"One area I don't like has to do with the agent that goes on the system... if a system stays offline for some length of time, say for a week or so, I may have to go back in and reinstall the agent to get it back in business. I don't know what's causing that."

"The recovery side, the restore side, could be a little more optimized."

More N-able Cove Data Protection cons

"The deployment cost is expensive."

"The initial setup is complex."

"The database administration needs improvement. With Oracle, we have a lot of features for administrating data, but it might be too many. It needs to be simplified. It should be automated. Looking at Enterprise Manager, there are too many KPIs in place."

"Overall, there are some operational issues that need to be dealt with."

"The usage of block storage devices in the cloud or migration of a type of storage from one site to another site can be improved. Currently, we have to use multi-node to single node because of the lack of storage support on the Azure side. It did not really work. Our DBA had to spend a lot of time tweaking the Data Guard tools, or the underlying Oracle VMs, to make sure that Data Guard would run on top of different types of storage. So, if it can support transporting or getting from one type of storage to another type of storage in a different site or a different technology, it would be very helpful."

"One thing that can be improved is the GUI. It would be good to have a very nice GUI to easily configure and administer, providing different presentations to the database administrator. The feature that can be included is the integration with third-party monitoring systems, that is, monitoring systems from other vendors, not only from Oracle."

"The only difficult part is the cost factor, licensing. Another area of improvement is support."

"The predominant issue lies in the communication link between the secondary and primary databases."

More Oracle Data Guard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is very competitive and it's well worth the price."

"The only option I would like to see is an adjustable scale. Right now we have 250 seats and we're not using all of them. It would be nice to be able to save that little bit of money by being able to buy just what we need."

"The pricing of SolarWinds seems to be fair compared to the rest of the industry."

"The pricing is affordable. N-able Cove Data Protection has a direct-to-cloud architecture, but it also allows saving backups locally without extra storage costs."

"I believe that the price is very reasonable in comparison to other options. It is cheaper than both Redstor and Acronis and, since we are now using our own on-premise cloud, there is absolutely no comparison since we have unlimited storage rather than paying per gigabyte used for their onsite storage. We are currently able to backup fifty computers for the same price that we use to backup five computers."

"The cost is around ten dollars per workstation a month and that includes a certain amount of data."

"The price isn't extreme, but I'd love to pay less."

"The pricing, for now, is good. The package that they gave us recently is pretty good. It depends on how many clients you have, and you pay for certain terabytes per license. These terabytes, if not used, are pooled together."

More N-able Cove Data Protection pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is on the higher side."

"The licensing cost is significantly high."

"It's a cost-effective solution."

"This is the best solution if you want something similar that's less expensive than Oracle Grid."

"The cost of the Oracle license will depend on the negotiations with Oracle."

"It is not a cheap product, but if you look at the price, features, availability, scalability, and maturity, it is a very good product."

"The cost is expensive."

"Oracle Data Guard is a feature available only in Oracle Database Enterprise Edition, and is available for extra cost."

More Oracle Data Guard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for N-able Backup?

In terms of pricing, N-able Cove Data Protection is neither cheap nor expensive compared to other competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N-able Backup?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able Backup?

Our main use cases for enabling N-able Cove Data Protection include backing up our customers' data on servers hosted in data centers and servers hosted in our own data center, as well as a few onsi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

It is a very useful administrative IT tool. It saves on costs. I strongly recommend Data Guard. I've been using it for eight years and I would strongly recommend it. I'd rate Oracle Data Guard a se...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

We're Oracle partners. We've worked with databases 11G and 12C. If a company is planning to implement Oracle solutions, I would suggest they also implement Data Guard. I'd rate the solution nine ou...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 9% of the time

Synology C2 Backup vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 5% of the time

Boxafe vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Azure Backup vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 4% of the time

More N-able Cove Data Protection Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Oracle Data Guard

Compared 11% of the time

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Oracle Data Guard

Compared 9% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Oracle Data Guard

Compared 7% of the time

Dell NetWorker vs Oracle Data Guard

Compared 6% of the time

Actifio vs Oracle Data Guard

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Data Guard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

N-able Cove Data Protection

January 2026

Download N-able Cove Data Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Data Guard

January 2026

Download Oracle Data Guard product report

Also Known As

N-able Backup, SolarWinds Backup, SolarWinds MSP Backup & Recovery, SolarWinds MSP Backup

Active Data Guard

Overview

Cove Data Protection, from N-able, is a comprehensive solution designed to safeguard critical business data. It offers a range of features including backup and recovery, disaster recovery, and endpoint protection. With automated backups and flexible scheduling options, it ensures data is protected and easily recoverable.

The solution also includes advanced security measures such as encryption and ransomware detection to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches. Cove Data Protection provides seamless integration with various platforms and offers centralized management for efficient monitoring and control.

With its user-friendly interface and robust capabilities, Cove Data Protection is an ideal choice for businesses seeking reliable data protection.

N-able

Oracle Data Guard ensures high availability, data protection, and disaster recovery for enterprise data. Data Guard provides a comprehensive set of services that create, maintain, manage, and monitor one or more standby databases to enable production Oracle databases to survive disasters and data corruptions. Data Guard can be used with traditional backup, restoration, and cluster techniques to provide a high level of data protection and data availability.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Computer Depot, Leading Edge Computers, IT Logic Australia

Athenahealth, Discover Financial Services

Buyer's Guide

N-able Cove Data Protection vs. Oracle Data Guard

February 2026

Free Report: N-able Cove Data Protection vs. Oracle Data Guard

Find out what your peers are saying about N-able Cove Data Protection vs. Oracle Data Guard and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N-able Cove Data Protection vs. Oracle Data Guard report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.