Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

MongoDB Atlas vs Redis comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.0
Users achieved strong ROI from MongoDB Atlas through cost savings, fast performance, and efficient cloud-based data management despite high support costs.
Sentiment score
6.5
Redis enhances speed, reduces costs by 40%, boosts efficiency, and offers scalability, stability, and high availability, increasing customer trust.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
MongoDB Atlas customer service is praised for knowledgeable premium support, with faster responses in higher-tier plans despite some cost concerns.
Sentiment score
1.0
Most users lack direct Redis support experience; reviews vary from knowledgeable and fast to low-rated service.
The features of MongoDB Atlas fall short, resulting in an average rating due to higher-expectation features still lacking in its offerings.
I have used them sometimes, even recently, and found the feedback to be spot on our needs.
For premium support, I would rate the support of MongoDB Atlas a nine.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
MongoDB Atlas effectively scales from gigabytes to terabytes, handling thousands of users, though shard management can be challenging.
Sentiment score
7.7
Redis is highly scalable, supporting clustering and cloud integration, making it ideal for enterprise and growing data needs.
It's very much scalable, and I would rate scalability a nine.
MongoDB Atlas offers sharding as a scalability feature, although it does not perform as well as Oracle.
Data migration and changes to application-side configurations are challenging due to the lack of automatic migration tools in a non-clustered legacy system.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
MongoDB Atlas is highly reliable, efficiently handling workloads with automatic updates, despite minor interface issues, and is user-trusted.
Sentiment score
7.7
Redis is highly reliable, handling heavy loads with strong uptime, requiring minimal maintenance, and proving dependable across infrastructures.
When it comes to OLTP transactions, its performance declines.
The stability of the product is very high.
Redis is fairly stable.
 

Room For Improvement

MongoDB Atlas users seek UI improvements, cost reduction, better integration, scalability, and enhanced security, training, APIs, and support.
Redis struggles with cluster development, cloud integration, documentation, user experience, and requires enhancements in security and enterprise features.
Enhancing vector processing for AI capabilities would also be critical.
MongoDB Atlas should support containerization.
Data persistence and recovery face issues with compatibility across major versions, making upgrades possible but downgrades not active.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers find MongoDB Atlas pricing acceptable, yet opinions on cost-effectiveness differ; the free tier enhances its appeal.
Redis offers cost-effective options but may incur additional fees for RAM and managed services, requiring careful cost evaluation.
The price of MongoDB Atlas is reasonable, which is why many organizations, including mine, are opting for it.
For our service, it was around 300 to 600 euros per month, which was acceptable for our customers.
Since we use an open-source version of Redis, we do not experience any setup costs or licensing expenses.
 

Valuable Features

MongoDB Atlas offers speed, flexibility, easy scalability, and advanced features for efficient data management, enhancing performance and reducing costs.
Redis offers high-speed in-memory storage, efficient caching, multiple data structures, scalability, and durability for reliable, scalable applications.
The most valuable features of MongoDB Atlas in handling large data volumes include collection size and its NoSQL database capabilities.
I find MongoDB Atlas highly scalable and easy to use, with very good support.
It is particularly useful for unstructured and semi-structured data because of its performance in these areas.
It functions similarly to a foundational building block in a larger system, enabling native integration and high functionality in core data processes.
 

Categories and Ranking

MongoDB Atlas
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
Database as a Service (DBaaS) (3rd), Managed NoSQL Databases (5th)
Redis
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
NoSQL Databases (7th), In-Memory Data Store Services (1st), Vector Databases (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

MongoDB Atlas and Redis aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. MongoDB Atlas is designed for Database as a Service (DBaaS) and holds a mindshare of 14.5%, down 16.7% compared to last year.
Redis, on the other hand, focuses on In-Memory Data Store Services, holds 20.2% mindshare, up 16.7% since last year.
Database as a Service (DBaaS)
In-Memory Data Store Services
 

Featured Reviews

Laksiri Bala - PeerSpot reviewer
Room for improvement in data handling leads to enhanced cost-effective data management performance
It would be beneficial if MongoDB Atlas could better support OLTP aspects and data frames, as well as enhance its capabilities for data pipelines and visualization dashboards. Furthermore, supporting the medallion architecture could be a valuable addition, and incorporating improved spatial and vector handling for geographical data could make it more competitive. Enhancing vector processing for AI capabilities would also be critical.
Yaseer Arafat - PeerSpot reviewer
Unmatched Performance and Scalability for Modern Applications
Redis has room for improvement in a few areas. Enhanced tools for managing and monitoring clusters would be beneficial, as would built-in security mechanisms like advanced encryption and granular access controls. Simplifying setup and configuration could make Redis more accessible to new users. Introducing more enterprise-grade features, such as better multi-tenancy support and improved backup and restore capabilities, would also be advantageous. For the next release, it would be great to see enhanced cluster management tools, native multi-region supports for better data redundancy, integrated analytics for deeper insights, AI and ML integration features, and improved developer experience through enhanced SDKs and tools.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Financial Services Firm
24%
Computer Software Company
13%
Educational Organization
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MongoDB Atlas?
There are many valuable features, but scalability stands out. It can scale across zones. You can define multiple nodes. They have also partnered with AWS, offering great service with multiple featu...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB Atlas?
The price of MongoDB Atlas is reasonable, which is why many organizations, including mine, are opting for it.
What needs improvement with MongoDB Atlas?
There is nothing about MongoDB Atlas I would like to improve or any weak points at this time. I have not thought through what other features I would like to see included in future updates. MongoDB ...
What do you like most about Redis?
Redis is better tested and is used by large companies. I haven't found a direct alternative to what Redis offers. Plus, there are a lot of support and learning resources available, which help you u...
What needs improvement with Redis?
The disadvantage of Redis is that it's a little bit hard to have too many clusters or too many nodes and create the clusters. The sync between the nodes is easier to implement with Couchbase, for e...
What is your primary use case for Redis?
Redis is used for a part of a booking engine for travel, specifically for the front part to get some sessions and information about the sessions. If a customer or user is using the sites in differe...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Atlas, MongoDB Atlas (pay-as-you-go)
Redis Enterprise
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Wells Fargo, Forbes, Ulta Beauty, Bosch, Sanoma, Current (a Digital Bank), ASAP Log, SBB, Zebra Technologies, Radial, Kovai, Eni, Accuhit, Cognigy, and Payload.
1. Twitter 2. GitHub 3. StackOverflow 4. Pinterest 5. Snapchat 6. Craigslist 7. Digg 8. Weibo 9. Airbnb 10. Uber 11. Slack 12. Trello 13. Shopify 14. Coursera 15. Medium 16. Twitch 17. Foursquare 18. Meetup 19. Kickstarter 20. Docker 21. Heroku 22. Bitbucket 23. Groupon 24. Flipboard 25. SoundCloud 26. BuzzFeed 27. Disqus 28. The New York Times 29. Walmart 30. Nike 31. Sony 32. Philips
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB Atlas vs. Redis and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.