Mojo Networks vs Ruckus Wireless comparison

Arista and Ruckus are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Arista is ranked #24, while Ruckus is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7. Arista holds a 1.5% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Ruckus’s 10.5% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Arista users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Ruckus users who would recommend it.

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

1,559 Views
1,528 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Ruckus Wireless

Read 106 Ruckus Wireless reviews

14,403 Views
13,971 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Ruckus Wireless

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Ruckus Wireless and Mojo Networks compete in the wireless connectivity sector, each with unique features tailored to various user needs. Ruckus Wireless appears to hold an edge with its BeamFlex technology for stable coverage, while Mojo Networks stands out with its advanced security capabilities.

Features: Ruckus Wireless is characterized by its BeamFlex technology, providing dependable Wi-Fi coverage and connectivity. Users note its ease of setup, along with robust scalability that facilitates efficient management. Mojo Networks excels with cloud-based solutions, offering strong analytics and monitoring. The wireless intrusion prevention system adds a layer of security that distinguishes it in security-focused environments.

Room for Improvement: Ruckus Wireless could benefit from improved support response times and more advanced analytics features. Users suggest integrating more cloud capabilities. Mojo Networks users desire a unified management interface and enhancements in technical support and security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ruckus Wireless performs well in on-premises deployments with reliable support, though some users experience slow response times due to transitions. Mojo Networks thrives in hybrid and cloud deployments, with a seamless setup and good technical support, although premium support can be costly. Ruckus offers extensive international support, whereas Mojo provides user-friendly deployment and support structures.

Pricing and ROI: Ruckus Wireless is considered expensive, which may be a barrier for smaller organizations, but offers good ROI thanks to technology reliability and reduced operational costs. Mojo Networks offers cost-effective pricing compared to competitors like Meraki, providing essential features at a lower cost. Both solutions ensure long-term value, appealing to those valuing performance and security.

To learn more, read our detailed Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,495 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ruckus Wireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

106

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Mojo Networks is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ruckus Wireless is 10.5%, down from 14.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Ruckus Wireless	10.5%
Mojo Networks	1.5%
Other	88.0%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Pedro Soteras

CEO at ajuntament del Prat

Reliable wireless coverage has supported busy operations and has improved daily connectivity

We have areas that are interference-prone. I am not using BeamFlex technology with Ruckus Wireless. We are satisfied, but there are some problems in the current Ruckus Wireless solution that we could not solve two years ago, and we are still waiting for a solution. These are lateral management problems, and we solved them with another type of tools. However, I do not know if the new versions of the product have resolved that issue. We had approximately 150 access points at that time, so we had many points to change. We had another solution five years ago, and we changed all the access points to Ruckus Wireless solution as well as the Ruckus Wireless platform to manage all the access points.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Altogether, they are unbeatable in the market."

"The most important feature is ease of use. We can simply take an access point and plug it in, then it is automatically configured for us."

"At certain points, there are hardware updates and they send notifications before they do the updates."

"The fact that they are autonomous and can function even without access to the management panel is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"The pricing was a good value and substantially less than some of the other products that we looked at, and in some cases, with some of the bigger names, this product was even close to half the price."

"The initial setup was easy."

"We have found Mojo to be critical for us because of its patented security and its wireless intrusion prevention system (WIPS). It is unique in the market."

"Mojo Networks (Arista WiFi) is extremely secure with WIPS, built-in wireless."

More Mojo Networks pros

"The Ruckus SCI has transformed traditional network reporting into a vital business tool, collecting, analyzing, parsing, presenting, and storing unprecedented amounts of user, traffic, session, and location information."

"In summary, I think that Ruckus is a good product."

"The Ruckus Location-Based Services (LBS) Solution is the highlight that enables businesses to enhance the way of interaction with their customers on the basis of precise location."

"With Ruckus, even if you have a big environment, you can get great performance with only one access point."

"I find signal combining and team forming in Ruckus Wireless most valuable."

"The most valuable is the central administration. Provides quick views of activity, from the number of clients online to signal and noise readings."

"The most valuable features are the coverage and durability."

"The most valuable feature is that Ruckus offers better coverage."

More Ruckus Wireless pros

Cons

"The setup was complex."

"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different “apps” to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network. This can be confusing, although Mojo has made great strides in combining these into “Aware”."

"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."

"Compared to other OEMs, Mojo Networks or Arista faces a little bit of coverage issues. So, if we put the same dBm, the power of the other OEMs indicates much more extensive coverage compared to Mojo or Arista."

"The customer service and support took a lot of time to come on the troubleshooting call."

"Something that could be improved is the ability to easily and quickly see what speed someone is on and if there are any issues on the network. We are using the older software technology, so maybe their newest version is able to do that."

"Technical support could be more helpful. They are lacking a bit in that regard."

"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."

More Mojo Networks cons

"The switching could be improved. The active component requires a data center. Cisco and HPE have a complete solution for data centers. Ruckus has a core solution, but the data center aspect needs to be improved."

"The solution currently lacks the integration of security services."

"Its pricing and licensing can be improved. Its UI can also be more user-friendly."

"The pricing of the product can be a bit expensive. They should work on making pricing more competitive."

"Ruckus products, overall, have a wide range of useful features, however not all customers have the budget to buy a corporate Wi-Fi solution. Most of the time, it's far too expensive for our clients to consider going with Ruckus, and they might like to see cheaper solutions in the Ruckus range."

"The software should be made more stable."

"Sometimes doing mass changes on their products can be challenging."

"The solution lacks a lot of features other solutions provide."

More Ruckus Wireless cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It requires a license and that's a recurring cost and that has a really high cheque value."

"I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The pricing was a good value and substantially less than some of the other products that we looked at. In some cases, with some of the big names, this product was even close to half the price."

"In Australian dollars, we buy it for five years at $1,200."

"The cost is a one-time fee."

"There are other solutions, like Ubiquiti, that have lowered their prices, which sometimes makes the argument to go with them. However, we do not bake in the WiFi for other vendors into our managed services, because they do not meet our standard offering."

"They have been a great price competitor against some of the other big brands, like Meraki, especially for cloud-based WiFi. However, Meraki has been more expensive. They beat Meraki on features for the WiFi, which makes them a better choice even if the price is the same."

"The license is provided per access point, so you buy an access point and you use it."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

"It depends on the client. You have an initial license cost that you need to buy to bind the access point with the controller. This is a one-time fee. You also have to pay the support fee that, if I remember correctly, is about $25 per access point. Its pricing and licensing can be improved."

"The price is high and I give the price a four out of ten."

"I rate the product price as six to seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"Cost-wise, the product is priced above average, considering its competitors in the market."

"The price of Ruckus Wireless is less expensive than other solutions, such as Cisco."

"If you walk into any restaurant or hotel you will find Ruckus Wireless solutions because it is economical when it comes to pricing. There is a basic subscription for the license and support."

"Ruckus Wireless is available at a reasonable price"

"It's quite expensive, but that is what you get with these types of solutions."

More Ruckus Wireless pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Aruba Wireless or Ruckus Wireless?

At my organization, we researched Ruckus Wireless among other solutions but ultimately chose Aruba wireless. What did we like about Ruckus? First, it was very easy to use, and anybody with minimal...

See all answers

Which is better - Ruckus Wireless or Cisco Wireless?

Ruckus Wireless offers users the benefit of being both easy to set up and get running as well as being very user friendly. This user-friendly quality also renders it easy to learn how to use and ma...

See all answers

How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

SonicWall SonicWave Access Points vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiWLM vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Cisco Wireless vs Ruckus Wireless

Compared 27% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Ruckus Wireless

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Ruckus Wireless

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Ruckus Wireless

Compared 5% of the time

ExtremeWireless vs Ruckus Wireless

Compared 5% of the time

More Ruckus Wireless Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

June 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Ruckus Wireless

June 2026

Download Ruckus Wireless product report

Also Known As

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

No data available

Overview

Mojo Networks delivers cloud-based architecture focusing on control, visibility, security, and reliability, with support for high-density WiFi requirements and seamless integration for expanded network environments.

Mojo Networks is renowned for its cloud-based architecture, providing robust control and visibility with strong security features like WIPS. Its autonomous capabilities and adaptive analytics, such as Cognitive WiFi, add significant value by ensuring effective guest WiFi management and diagnostics. Its intuitive installation and automated configuration facilitate network expansions, further enhancing the user experience with a mesh network. Strong security means and cost efficiency set Mojo Networks apart in the competitive market space.

What are the standout features?

Cloud-Based Architecture: Integrated system offering control and visibility.
WIPS Security: Offers enhanced wireless security features.
Cognitive WiFi: Advanced analytics for network optimization.
Autonomous Capabilities: Simplifies management with automation.
Mesh Network: Guarantees seamless connectivity.

What should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Simple installation and configuration process.
Scalability: Facilitates easy network expansion.
Reliability: Stable performance in high-density environments.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing across regions.
Security: Comprehensive protection against threats.

Mojo Networks is prevalent in public WiFi infrastructure and corporate guest WiFi across offices, schools, and restaurants. Its cloud-managed feature supports robust managed WiFi offerings, popularly deployed in educational institutions to ensure a secure distributed wireless environment. Businesses value its ease of management and security features with widespread application across many sectors.

Arista

Ruckus Wireless is renowned for its BeamFlex technology, delivering strong connectivity and ease of use. With integration for existing networks and support for Wi-Fi 6, it provides robust performance in high-density environments such as offices and educational institutions.

Known for reliability and seamless integration, Ruckus Wireless offers scalable wireless solutions ideal for demanding environments. Utilizing SmartRoam and mesh networking, it ensures connectivity and enhanced user experience. Compatibility with Wi-Fi 6 technology and intelligent analytics features cater to the needs of enterprise environments, hospitality, and educational sectors. However, pricing competitiveness and cloud solutions require enhancement alongside improvements in security features to align with industry expectations, addressing concerns about delivery times and feature innovation.

What are the standout features of Ruckus Wireless?

BeamFlex Technology: Improves signal reach and reliability.
Scalability: Easily expands to meet company growth.
SmartRoam: Ensures seamless connectivity transitions.
Mesh Networking: Provides flexible, expansive network coverage.
Wi-Fi 6 Support: Delivers high-efficiency wireless in dense environments.
Intelligent Analytics: Offers valuable network insights and data.

What are the benefits businesses should expect from Ruckus Wireless?

Reliable Performance: Consistent connectivity, reducing downtime.
Cost-efficiency: Competitive pricing for efficient network solutions.
User-friendly Integration: Seamless with existing network infrastructures.
Robust Technical Support: Responsive assistance for troubleshooting and setup.

Across sectors like hospitality, education, and entertainment, Ruckus Wireless is deployed to enhance wireless connectivity. It supports environments needing resilient wireless performance from college campuses to theaters, utilizing access points and sophisticated network management capabilities to improve user connectivity experiences.

Ruckus

Sample Customers

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

American University of Sharjah, Baruch College, Centro Escolar Liceo Santo Tomšs, Chevalier College, Chico Unified School District, Colegio de Fomento El Prado, Columbia Public Schools, Delta School District, Dordt College, Douglas County School District, Drew University, Armonea, Central Utah Clinic, Grove Hill Medical Center, Inner South Community Health Service, Midwest Surgical, Satilla Regional Medical Center, Lyndoch Living, Polonus, Roaring Fork School District, Sonora State, Vivid, Sydney, Players Club, Sandals, Scandic Hotels, Sheraton LAX, Sunbird

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless

June 2026

Free Report: Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless

Find out what your peers are saying about Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.