Aruba Wireless vs Mojo Networks comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Arista are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while Arista is ranked #24. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 12.9% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Arista’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Arista users who would recommend it.

Aruba Wireless

Read 151 Aruba Wireless reviews

17,846 Views
16,240 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

1,809 Views
1,773 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Aruba Wireless

Mojo Networks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Aruba Wireless and Mojo Networks both compete in the wireless networking industry. Aruba seems to have the upper hand due to its broad integration capabilities and advanced security features.

Features: Aruba Wireless offers integrated firewall, captive portal authentication, and a modular configuration system. AppRF enhances traffic visibility, while ARM, Spectrum Analysis, and WIP provide robust security and management. Integration with ClearPass supports BYOD and its multi-site architecture aids scalability. Mojo Networks focuses on cloud solutions, emphasizing ease of use and security with WIPS. Their cost-effective pricing caters well to cloud setups.

Room for Improvement: Aruba faces stability challenges in newer versions and improvements are needed in ClearPass troubleshooting and documentation. Configuration could be more intuitive. Mojo Networks could benefit from enhancing its management interface with better diagnostics and consolidating platforms for simplicity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aruba primarily supports on-premises environments with some hybrid capabilities, and customer service is generally good but sometimes has response time concerns. Mojo Networks offers flexibility through its cloud-based architecture. Technical support ratings vary, but Mojo provides integrated assistance that many find efficient.

Pricing and ROI: Aruba's pricing is competitive and comparable with major players like Cisco, though some users find it high. The evolved licensing suits user needs better and ROI is favorable when replacing legacy systems. Mojo Networks stands out for its cost-effectiveness, offering lower prices than competitors with adequate feature coverage, enhancing ROI due to cloud-based solution savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Wireless vs. Mojo Networks Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Wireless vs. Mojo Networks

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 910,437 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Wireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

151

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Wireless is 12.9%, down from 16.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mojo Networks is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Aruba Wireless	12.9%
Mojo Networks	1.5%
Other	85.6%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Chanchai Kaewwichian

Network Administrator at Nippon Express Canada Ltd.

Wireless network has supported long-term reliable access and simplifies RF optimization

I have experience with Cisco products and the Cisco brand. The product is mainly a hardware product. Regarding the software part, I don't have a lot of experience. Aruba Wireless was not too difficult to set up. When compared with other products such as Cisco, they also have products with wireless controllers, and it's similar to that. I think it should be recommended for both bigger and smaller companies based on the feedback and our experience. I believe there should be AI functions that might help us in some cases of cybersecurity matters, detecting threats regarding security would be better with AI. For this role, I have more than twenty years of experience. I would rate Aruba Wireless eight out of ten overall.

Read full review

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As we have acquired a few companies, having the ability to have multiple RADIUS connections has helped us."

"From a purely wireless perspective, I think that Aruba is number one."

"Aruba is pretty scalable."

"The Aruba Central portal is a good interface that helps us monitor the wireless devices extensively. Furthermore, the access points we use, mainly API nine zero five, are working well."

"If we really want to know where a specific user is connected, it gives us the ability to see that and how that user is actually receiving. We can know the speed and their IP, their MAC address and, most of the time, how much bandwidth they're using per day."

"Stability and its ability to handle more devices has been an improvement for our organization."

"It is easy to install and deploy."

"Support for both on-premises and cloud environments has proven effective for network management."

More Aruba Wireless pros

"For support, we do not have to deal with a whole phone menu tree. You get to talk to an engineer right away."

"We just plugged it in and it worked. That just doesn't happen. We plugged it in and it worked and all 100 kids got on the test and started testing."

"The technical support is pretty good."

"The initial setup was easy."

"In summary, there is very little that can be improved with this product."

"The technical support for the solution is very helpful."

"The security is a valuable feature."

"At certain points, there are hardware updates and they send notifications before they do the updates."

More Mojo Networks pros

Cons

"Additional detailed reporting for client traffic would be a great addition."

"Some model of APs went bad over time."

"Aruba doesn't match some competitors in wireless signal strength. It isn't in the same class as Cisco Meraki, so I would use Cisco Meraki in situations where I need to cover a large open space. Meraki has more powerful signals going out."

"Honestly, and simply put, I would look elsewhere. I feel this company falls short on its promises, has been a pain to work with, and the product I feel is inferior to its many competitors."

"Some of the diagnostic features I'd expect to help me troubleshoot parts of the network are missing."

"Currently, the stability of the code is the basic underlying problem for us. They had an 8.6 release that came out two weeks ago, but we had to migrate twice because the code wasn't stable. We can't get things to work the same way. Version 8 was a big change for them. They made a change so that it is forced to be a managed hierarchical system. It means that you make changes at the top, and it pushes them downstream. There are a lot of problems with the 8.6 version code. I ran into four bugs in one week and was informed that we should just move onto the next one because all of those fixes have taken place. The feedback loop for fixes is not always really relayed back to you. I don't have a lot of strong things to say about version 8.6. When we had version 6, the controller was pretty much rock solid. We had no problems. We made a heavy investment to migrate a lot of stuff to take advantage of things like WPA3, Wi-Fi 6, and all that kind of stuff, and we haven't been able to turn those features on because we are not confident that they are going to work just yet. So, right now, we're still very much stumbling through the version 8.6 code and just trying to make sure that it is safe before we turn on some of those features. In terms of the marketplace, they are one of the top three leaders. In some respects, one of the things that they focus on is wireless. Therefore, there are some things that should be beyond reproach, as far as I'm concerned. In terms of the stability of the code, there are always going to be bugs, but the core stability of the code needs to be there. When it is not stable, that's a real problem for me because you lose a lot of confidence in the products."

"To enhance the system, more work on integration would be beneficial."

"When you reach the limit of 100 users or have too many devices, you will experience a loss of connectivity."

More Aruba Wireless cons

"Compared to other OEMs, Mojo Networks or Arista faces a little bit of coverage issues. So, if we put the same dBm, the power of the other OEMs indicates much more extensive coverage compared to Mojo or Arista."

"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."

"The user interface could use improvement, and Mojo is working on it. The features and functions are in two different places, and they are in the process of moving them into one place."

"They could use more additional application security and network security features. They could add on to the WiFi as a selling point. It would be nice to be able to say to the WiFi users, "We will protect you against viruses and malware, so you don't have to purchase that.""

"The distribution can be improved, particularly in this part of the world."

"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."

"The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."

"Both further expanding the API and access to even more diagnostics, as I have found a few limitations when I am dealing with them right now."

More Mojo Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Aruba Wireless is higher than other products, but you'll get stability, performance, and functionality out of it. On a scale of one to five, I'm rating the price of Aruba Wireless a three."

"The price of Aruba Wireless could improve. It is expensive. However, I am able to reduce my costs because I do not use all the features in the controller, such as the AD integration and other enterprise features."

"When you look at the price it is a higher price than Cisco."

"It offers a lower cost compared to other products, which is a significant advantage."

"Aruba Wireless is much cheaper than our previous solution by Cisco. It is a significant saving, measured in thousands of dollars per year."

"The price of Aruba Wireless is reasonable."

"I think it would be better if they lowered the price."

"The support pricing for Juniper Mist is higher than Aruba."

More Aruba Wireless pricing and cost advice

"Pricing includes the planning tools, management, security, analytics, and advanced guest WiFi capabilities. It's always better to buy the longest term available for the best ROI. However, device will continue to function without valid cloud license."

"There are other solutions, like Ubiquiti, that have lowered their prices, which sometimes makes the argument to go with them. However, we do not bake in the WiFi for other vendors into our managed services, because they do not meet our standard offering."

"We have a term that is renewed every three years."

"It requires a license and that's a recurring cost and that has a really high cheque value."

"The license is provided per access point, so you buy an access point and you use it."

"In Australian dollars, we buy it for five years at $1,200."

"The cost is a one-time fee."

"I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

910,437 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user212721

President at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Mar 24, 2015

Cisco vs. Aruba Wireless Solutions

Cisco or Aruba Networks? If you are considering wireless access solutions, this is a common question that you are probably asking. You probably have sales people knocking at your door. How do you make sense of all the stories that you are presented with. If you have done any research, you are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

14%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	77
Midsize Enterprise	47
Large Enterprise	77

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?

Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...

See all answers

Aruba Wireless or Ruckus Wireless?

At my organization, we researched Ruckus Wireless among other solutions but ultimately chose Aruba wireless. What did we like about Ruckus? First, it was very easy to use, and anybody with minimal...

See all answers

How does Cisco Wireless compare with Aruba Wireless?

On the most basic level, Cisco Wireless can offer a rather straightforward initial setup. In the span of about three hours, the basic framework can be set up. Step-by-step instructions are availabl...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Wireless

Compared 30% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Aruba Wireless

Compared 18% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Aruba Wireless

Compared 9% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Aruba Wireless

Compared 4% of the time

Fortinet FortiWLM vs Aruba Wireless

Compared 4% of the time

More Aruba Wireless Competitors

Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Omada Access Points vs Mojo Networks

Compared 4% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Wireless

August 2026

Download Aruba Wireless product report

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

August 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Also Known As

Aruba WLAN, HP WLAN, HP Wireless, Aruba Instant On AP Series Access Point

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

Overview

Aruba Wireless is a secure, high-performance, multi-user wireless LAN supporting Wi-Fi 6. As workplaces and user expectations change, users can now maintain hybrid workplaces and IoT without compromising performance, reliability, or security. Aruba Wireless delivers better performance and capacity and greater AIOps visibility throughout all devices and users. In addition, through built-in network intelligence, network operations are made simpler while keeping everything secure through user and guest encryption.

Aruba Wireless, offered through Aruba Networks, is helping achieve digital transformation and IoT with seamless connectivity through multiple Wi-Fi access points. For the user’s convenience, Aruba Wireless provides indoor, outdoor, and remote access points to help boost faster and safer connectivity.

Choosing Aruba Wireless can help improve your organization’s user experience with wireless LAN in many ways, including:

Transforming hybrid workplaces: Employees can move seamlessly between home and office, with reliable internet and without compromising security.
Connect and protect IoT: With built-in AP support for BLE, Zigbee, and USB-port extensions, users can extend visibility, control, and connectivity to IoT devices and applications.
Expand the 5G experience to the enterprise network: Empower users to experience 5G with Wi-Fi 6 by automatically enabling cellular devices to join Aruba Wireless LAN securely and reliably.

Aruba Gateways and Controllers

Small organizations as well as large enterprises require excellent performance and security for cloud, mobility, and digital transformation. Therefore, in addition to the access points, Aruba Wireless also offers a variety of gateways and controllers, including:

9000 Series: With SD-WAN capabilities, it’s excellent for small campus networks looking for enhanced Wi-Fi scalability and security.
7200 Series: Perfect for campus WLAN scalability or branch SD-WAN and VPN Concentrator capabilities, the 7200 Series optimizes Wi-Fi performance to guarantee smooth roaming.
7000 Series: Acting as a controller or gateway to provide WAN intelligence, the 7000 Series is a policy-based router and an excellent solution for small to mid-sized campuses.
Mobility Controller Virtual Appliance: Maximizes Wi-Fi and network services in an economical, virtualized environment.
SD-WAN Virtual Gateways: Orchestrate virtual gateways in public cloud infrastructure, like Amazon Web Services (AWS).
Mobility Conductor Hardware Appliance: While enhancing the scalability and reliability for large campus WLANs, Aruba Mobility Conductors bring the full capability of ArubaOS.
Mobility Conductor Virtual Appliance: To scale large campus deployments, Aruba Mobility Conductors simplify the deployment and management of up to 1,000 Mobility Controllers.
ArubaOS Network Operating System: Great for remote workers in mid-sized and large companies who need seamless connectivity to and security over Wi-Fi.

Reviews from Real Users

Aruba Networks is aiding organizations in transforming to a hybrid work environment with Aruba Wireless. Users especially love its ability to work with many devices and its ability to group and manage access points.

A senior IT solutions architect at a manufacturing company says, "The most valuable feature is the fact that it can work with many devices. It supports everything that we need it to."

Gary F., a network administrator at wireless at Abilene Christian, notes, "I like the way it groups and manages access points."

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Mojo Networks delivers cloud-based architecture focusing on control, visibility, security, and reliability, with support for high-density WiFi requirements and seamless integration for expanded network environments.

Mojo Networks is renowned for its cloud-based architecture, providing robust control and visibility with strong security features like WIPS. Its autonomous capabilities and adaptive analytics, such as Cognitive WiFi, add significant value by ensuring effective guest WiFi management and diagnostics. Its intuitive installation and automated configuration facilitate network expansions, further enhancing the user experience with a mesh network. Strong security means and cost efficiency set Mojo Networks apart in the competitive market space.

What are the standout features?

Cloud-Based Architecture: Integrated system offering control and visibility.
WIPS Security: Offers enhanced wireless security features.
Cognitive WiFi: Advanced analytics for network optimization.
Autonomous Capabilities: Simplifies management with automation.
Mesh Network: Guarantees seamless connectivity.

What should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Simple installation and configuration process.
Scalability: Facilitates easy network expansion.
Reliability: Stable performance in high-density environments.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing across regions.
Security: Comprehensive protection against threats.

Mojo Networks is prevalent in public WiFi infrastructure and corporate guest WiFi across offices, schools, and restaurants. Its cloud-managed feature supports robust managed WiFi offerings, popularly deployed in educational institutions to ensure a secure distributed wireless environment. Businesses value its ease of management and security features with widespread application across many sectors.

Arista

Sample Customers

Consulate Health Care, Los Angeles Unified School District, Science Applications International Corp (SAIC), San Diego State University, KFC, ACTS Retirement-Life Communities

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Wireless vs. Mojo Networks

August 2026

Free Report: Aruba Wireless vs. Mojo Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Wireless vs. Mojo Networks and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

910,437 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aruba Wireless vs. Mojo Networks report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.