Microsoft Teams vs Quip comparison

The compared Microsoft and Quip solutions aren't in the same category. Microsoft is ranked #3 in VM , with an average rating of 8.4, and holds a 3.1% mindshare in the category. Quip is ranked #18 in CCP , and holds a 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution.

Microsoft Teams

Read 166 Microsoft Teams reviews

464 Views
201 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Quip

193 Views
166 Comparison Views

Microsoft Teams

Quip

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and Quip based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings.

To learn more, read our detailed Virtual Meetings Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,900 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Teams

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

166

Ranking in other categories

Virtual Meetings (3rd), Enterprise Social Software (1st)

Quip

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Content Collaboration Platforms (18th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Messaging and Collaboration solutions, they serve different purposes. Microsoft Teams is designed for Virtual Meetings and holds a mindshare of 3.1%, up 1.8% compared to last year.
Quip, on the other hand, focuses on Content Collaboration Platforms, holds 1.4% mindshare, up 1.1% since last year.

Virtual Meetings

Content Collaboration Platforms

Featured Reviews

Arun Srivastav

CEO at Planfirma Technologies Private Limited

Seamless presentation and collaboration enhance organizational productivity

There are three main areas for improvement: Firstly, AI capabilities should be integrated into Microsoft Teams to provide better transcript services and offer multiple language support. Secondly, it should allow participants to remain visible during presentations, enhancing interaction. Lastly, it needs broader integration capabilities with other products, like Salesforce ( /vendors/salesforce ), which is currently limited.

Read full review

Use Quip?

Share your opinion

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,900 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

65%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?

Microsoft Teams comes with Office 365 ( /products/office-365-reviews ) licenses like E3, but there are options for those who prefer not to pay for Teams by using alternative products like Slack ( /...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?

The biggest issue with Microsoft Teams is switching identities, especially when communicating with external organizations. Users often don't know they have messages from another company unless they...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Atlassian Confluence vs Microsoft Teams

Compared 29% of the time

Symphony vs Microsoft Teams

Compared 29% of the time

SharePoint vs Microsoft Teams

Compared 10% of the time

Huddle vs Microsoft Teams

Compared 10% of the time

Loom vs Microsoft Teams

Compared 10% of the time

More Microsoft Teams Competitors

Amazon WorkDocs vs Quip

Compared 55% of the time

Office 365 vs Quip

Compared 23% of the time

Slack vs Quip

Compared 22% of the time

More Quip Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Teams

April 2025

Download Microsoft Teams product report

Buyer's Guide

Content Collaboration Platforms

April 2025

Download Quip product report

Also Known As

MS Teams

No data available

Overview

At Microsoft, our mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Our mission is grounded in both the world in which we live and the future we strive to create. Today, we live in a mobile-first, cloud-first world, and the transformation we are driving across our businesses is designed to enable Microsoft and our customers to thrive in this world.

We do business in 170 countries and are made up of 114,000 passionate employees dedicated to fulfilling our mission of helping you and your organization achieve more.

Microsoft

Quip is a team collaboration solution which combines document and spreadsheet creation and editing with chat and commenting capabilities, to allow teams to communicate about tasks and projects directly while working on them.

Quip

Sample Customers

Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly

Fender, Twitch, Pinterest, Ultimate Software, New Relic, Facebook, Path, Larry Miller Companies, Kent Moore Cabinets, Taser, Zomato, Quora, Wealthfront, Benchmark, Greylock, Stripe, CNN, FiftyThree, Artivest, Trinity Valley School (edu), Delectable, Jack, NW stage, Average Joes Entertainment, Circa, Instacart, Mode Analytics, Clara, Assist, Remind, Airtable, Lean In, Famous, Al Jazeera,

Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,900 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.