

Informatica IDMC and Microsoft Purview operate in the data management and governance sector. Informatica IDMC appears to have the edge in comprehensive data management features, while Microsoft Purview excels in data governance and integration with Microsoft products.
Features: Informatica IDMC provides extensive integration capabilities, supporting a wide range of data management functions, including master data management, data quality, and data integration. Microsoft Purview focuses more on data governance with integration into the Microsoft ecosystem and offers strong compliance features, multi-cloud support, and security across varied platforms.
Room for Improvement: Informatica IDMC requires improvements in user interface and seamless integration, especially with SAP, and performance challenges have been reported. Microsoft Purview needs better connectivity to non-Microsoft environments and enhanced lineage tracking, with requests for stronger documentation and support for diverse cloud environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Informatica IDMC typically involves complex on-premises setup but offers flexibility in hybrid or cloud deployments, with generally positive customer service reviews, though response times can vary. Microsoft Purview is highlighted for its straightforward deployment in the Microsoft ecosystem. Its support is considered timely and capable, despite some challenges with initial configurations without comprehensive documentation.
Pricing and ROI: Informatica IDMC is generally more costly due to its comprehensive feature set, offering positive ROI for large enterprises with significant data needs. In contrast, Microsoft Purview provides more competitive pricing advantageous for small to medium enterprises within the Microsoft ecosystem, with affordable licensing and compelling data governance and compliance features.
Leadership prefers to utilize third-party tools, such as Snowflake, which has both storage and ELT features.
The stability and performance remain issues.
Compared to Collibra Catalog, where the value is noticeable within six months.
Clients benefit from using a one-stop-shop solution, increasing their visibility across different platforms.
Due to the tool's maturity limitations, solutions are not always simple and often require workarounds.
Even after going out of service support, they still reached back to me whenever I raised tickets.
We expect more responsive assistance because they have the expertise since Informatica is their tool, but I don't see enough expertise on the Informatica support side.
Overall, it doesn't meet our expectations.
They're skillful people who know what they're doing in their space.
I have a dedicated team as a government agency, and Microsoft assists us promptly.
I have used the product over multiple systems and was able to write reports for large data sets without any performance issues.
As a SaaS platform, IDMC is quite scalable and provides complete flexibility.
There are many options available, and the licensing model is quite good, supporting our needs effectively.
With automation, you can label five documents or 50,000 with the same amount of clicks.
It allows for one-to-one connections with different types of servers, either cloud-based like AWS, or physical servers.
The product is scalable and works across multi-cloud and multi-platform environments.
Stability is crucial because IDMC holds business-critical data, and it needs to be available all the time for business users.
There are substantial stability issues with Informatica Cloud Data Quality on the cloud.
I find the stability to be good, with occasional restarts required every two to three months due to glitches.
It can take seven days to 24 hours to determine whether a policy is effective.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance is absolutely fine in terms of stability.
The tool needs to mature in terms of category-specific attributes or dynamic attributes.
The current solution requires code-writing and tweaking, while other solutions offer material-level matches.
If the development interface could be optimized to have fewer modules, it would be greatly beneficial.
It's essential to know if a feature isn't working due to missing licenses.
There are some problems with DLP rules, and it would be great if the security around DLP could be expanded.
A watermark feature or similar tools to help enhance security for end users could be added.
It ranges from a quarter million to a couple of million a year.
Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is affordable for my specific use cases, with the pricing being rated three or four on a scale where one is very cheap.
Regarding pricing, compared to other tools I have worked with, Informatica offers competitive pricing, which I find not high in terms of starting strategy.
The feature might be available in the console, but it won't work without the proper license, creating confusion.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance is quite affordable compared to other market solutions, which have high initial costs.
I'm not exactly sure how much our license costs, but it is very expensive.
The platform's ability to pull in data from other platforms without the need for an additional integration tool enhances its appeal.
The connectors serve as the main functionality, making data integration processes more efficient by saving time and effort.
We could run data quality rules as part of Service Bus, which ensured the integrity of customer information before it was entered into our database.
It provides a comprehensive view of the entire ecosystem's threats and compliance in real time.
The sensitivity labeling is the most valuable feature because it is the foundation for automating the encryption process and ensuring proper data handling across the organization.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance has helped my company by finding insider risks, ensuring data loss prevention, and achieving compliance to make sure everybody is compliant.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Purview Data Governance | 16.6% |
| Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) | 6.1% |
| Other | 77.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 51 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 153 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 31 |
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) offers seamless integration of master data management, data quality, and data integration with a cloud-native architecture supporting multiple data management styles, optimizing data governance through metadata management.
IDMC enhances data synchronization and mapping tasks, utilizing a broad range of connectors to interact efficiently with data sources. Its precise address validation via AddressDoctor and intuitive navigation bolster user empowerment, delivering agility, scalability, and security in data governance. Despite its strengths, areas like ease of use, SAP integration, and reporting could benefit from enhancements. Connectivity issues and workflow complexities are noted, needing improvements in performance, support, and licensing cost. Users demand expanded ETL capabilities, real-time processing, and broader data source support to address growing data needs.
What are the key features of IDMC?In industries such as banking, healthcare, and telecom, IDMC is implemented for data integration, cloud migration, and enhancing data quality. Its capabilities are crucial for metadata management, lineage tracking, and real-time processing, ensuring high data quality and streamlined operations.
The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.