Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) and Microsoft Purview compete in the data governance and management software category. IDMC holds an advantage in integration features, while Microsoft Purview stands out in compliance management within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Features: Informatica IDMC offers on-the-fly data duplication and cleansing, data modeling, and integration with third-party data models. Its flexible architecture supports various data management styles. Microsoft Purview excels in data classification and protection across multi-cloud environments, with strengths in compliance management and seamless integration within Microsoft ecosystems.
Room for Improvement: IDMC needs improvements in user interface, enhanced data stewardship capabilities, and more robust reporting. Microsoft Purview should expand its integration capabilities with non-Microsoft platforms, enhance data lineage features, and support diverse cloud environments better. Both solutions face integration and user experience challenges.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IDMC offers versatile deployment across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments, with a reputation for excellent customer service. Microsoft Purview benefits from strong Microsoft ecosystem integration, especially for public cloud users, providing easy adoption for Microsoft clients with consistent and reliable support.
Pricing and ROI: Informatica's high pricing reflects its feature richness and brand reputation, offering substantial ROI in complex environments but deterring smaller enterprises. Microsoft Purview provides a cost-effective model for Microsoft 365 clients, offering good value and moderate pricing, attracting smaller organizations seeking comprehensive features without heavy investment in other ecosystems.
We see return on investment from this solution in terms of time; time reduction or cost benefits is what we are getting very good results from.
Clients benefit from using a one-stop-shop solution, increasing their visibility across different platforms.
Due to the tool's maturity limitations, solutions are not always simple and often require workarounds.
The response time is pretty good because we have someone in-house, who is an expert from Informatica, in our team who can help us with any sort of queries usually.
If they are unsure how to resolve an issue, they keep customers informed, providing updates about progress and ensuring communication with the product team to deliver accurate responses.
Overall, it doesn't meet our expectations.
They're skillful people who know what they're doing in their space.
I have a dedicated team as a government agency, and Microsoft assists us promptly.
As a SaaS platform, IDMC is quite scalable and provides complete flexibility.
I find Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) to be a sustainable and scalable solution.
With automation, you can label five documents or 50,000 with the same amount of clicks.
It allows for one-to-one connections with different types of servers, either cloud-based like AWS, or physical servers.
The product is scalable and works across multi-cloud and multi-platform environments.
Stability is crucial because IDMC holds business-critical data, and it needs to be available all the time for business users.
It can take seven days to 24 hours to determine whether a policy is effective.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance is absolutely fine in terms of stability.
The tool needs to mature in terms of category-specific attributes or dynamic attributes.
I also want to see integration with other Informatica products, such as IICS, to leverage the metadata from EDC.
The licenses are too expensive compared to before, which is why customers are now preferring other data metadata management tools like OneTrust, Collibra, and Azure Purview.
It's essential to know if a feature isn't working due to missing licenses.
There are some problems with DLP rules, and it would be great if the security around DLP could be expanded.
A watermark feature or similar tools to help enhance security for end users could be added.
It ranges from a quarter million to a couple of million a year.
The licenses are too expensive compared to before, which is why customers are now preferring other data metadata management tools like OneTrust, Collibra, and Azure Purview.
I think the costs are reasonable for the kinds of features that Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) has.
The feature might be available in the console, but it won't work without the proper license, creating confusion.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance is quite affordable compared to other market solutions, which have high initial costs.
I'm not exactly sure how much our license costs, but it is very expensive.
The platform's ability to pull in data from other platforms without the need for an additional integration tool enhances its appeal.
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) can connect to pretty much any application, including Oracle Analytics and Power BI, and it works quite seamlessly.
In on-premise, we call it EDC for metadata management, while in cloud-based technologies, it is known as the Metadata Command Center, which serves the same purpose as EDC concerning CDGC.
It provides a comprehensive view of the entire ecosystem's threats and compliance in real time.
The sensitivity labeling is the most valuable feature because it is the foundation for automating the encryption process and ensuring proper data handling across the organization.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance has helped my company by finding insider risks, ensuring data loss prevention, and achieving compliance to make sure everybody is compliant.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Microsoft Purview Data Governance | 21.6% |
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) | 6.1% |
Other | 72.3% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 42 |
Midsize Enterprise | 24 |
Large Enterprise | 134 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 20 |
Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
Large Enterprise | 30 |
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) integrates data quality, governance, and integration with flexible architecture. It supports multiple domains and a data models repository, delivering AI-enhanced data management across cloud-native platforms.
IDMC provides seamless integration and governance capabilities that support diverse data environments. Its comprehensive suite includes customizable workflows, data profiling, and metadata management. AI features, a data marketplace, and performance scalability enhance data management. While its interface poses challenges, its robust matching and cloud-native integration facilities are essential for complex data ecosystems. Users employ IDMC for connecting systems, ensuring data quality, and supporting data compliance but seek better pre-built rules, services, and improved connectivity, especially with platforms like Salesforce. Licensing, cost, and added AI functionalities are areas for potential refinement.
What are the key features of IDMC?IDMC is implemented across industries for data integration, metadata management, and governance. Organizations use it to connect systems, migrate data to cloud environments, and maintain data quality. They manage master data and automate business processes, facilitating data lineage and ensuring compliance with privacy regulations.
The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.