Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs SharePoint comparison

The compared Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and SharePoint solutions aren't in the same category. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is ranked #3 in CCP , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 4.3% mindshare in the category. SharePoint is ranked #1 in ECM , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 14.3% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of SharePoint users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Office SharePoint...

Read 38 Microsoft Office SharePoint Server reviews

1,304 Views
1,108 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

SharePoint

Read 164 SharePoint reviews

9,489 Views
4,745 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Microsoft Office SharePoint...

SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Content Collaboration Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. SharePoint Report (Updated: March 2020).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. SharePoint

March 2020

Download the complete report

Helped 873,003 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Office SharePoint...

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

4.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Content Collaboration Platforms (3rd)

SharePoint

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

164

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (1st), Web Content Management (1st), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Messaging and Collaboration solutions, they serve different purposes. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is designed for Content Collaboration Platforms and holds a mindshare of 4.3%, down 10.1% compared to last year.
SharePoint, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Content Management, holds 14.3% mindshare, down 18.6% since last year.

Content Collaboration Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server	4.3%
Google Workspace	10.2%
Office 365	10.1%
Other	75.4%

Content Collaboration Platforms

Enterprise Content Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SharePoint	14.3%
OpenText Documentum Content Management	9.8%
OpenText Content Management	9.7%
Other	66.2%

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Daniel Giacomelli

Security and Compliance at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has transformed how I manage documents through metadata and automation while enabling structured collaboration

Microsoft should restore some functionalities from older versions of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2003 and 2010. Specifically, bringing back something similar to SharePoint Designer would be beneficial. SharePoint Designer was both advantageous and challenging - developers found it limiting and preferred Visual Studio, while non-developers struggled to use it effectively. A new tool for configuring webpage design and development for content pages would be valuable. The current system is too basic. While integration of filtered lists and libraries is possible, it requires knowledge of Python or jQuery. A WYSIWYG editor would be preferable to requiring programming knowledge or Visual Studio.

Read full review

AnjneyBhardwaj

Senior Market Research Analyst at IDC Corporate

Collaboration has improved through simplified document access and controlled sharing

SharePoint is definitely used to keep a record of our files and data. The capability is quite good because it is time-saving. I have used it only four or five times, but it has been very helpful to keep all my information in a consolidated manner. The search feature is one of the most beneficial factors that we use to filter out the latest data or the latest file as per our convenience and use case. When you have a large repository, this feature is particularly valuable. Role-based access control has been helpful while developing the knowledge platform. The roles were defined clearly, which made it easy for the four or five of us to work simultaneously and collaborate on our project in a similar manner.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature that I value the most about Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is the ability to have multiple persons in a file at the same time, which was not possible when we started using computers."

"The solution is pretty easy to use for the most part."

"The software is friendly to use for mixing data and analyzing it."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the fact that it doesn't require coding. You just need to configure it. You don't need to code before getting something running. It makes it very fast."

"Microsoft Office SharePoint Server's document management significantly improves collaboration within my organization."

"The support from Microsoft is very quick and they are very proactive."

"The solution's most valuable features is its document management. It allows sharing with external users and integrates well with Office apps and Microsoft Flow."

"The level of stability is good."

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server pros

"Information is now available instantly to managers on all devices."

"There is not just one valuable feature; it is all of them working together."

"Combined reports and data with timeline tracking."

"The most valuable aspect of SharePoint is its integration with Teams. T"

"SharePoint manages version control, which makes it easier to track and amend documentation accurately, maintaining document integrity and enabling quick recovery if necessary."

"It is well supported by Microsoft."

"Its configuration management ability is critical for document-based systems."

"SharePoint acts as a version control system, allowing easy recovery of past document versions."

More SharePoint pros

Cons

"The product could be improved by accommodating different technologies, particularly integration."

"Searching information internally in Microsoft Office SharePoint Server could be better because when we get a lot of information, it is difficult to find."

"The solution is like a CRM, so the initial setup is complex. It takes a few days to deploy the solution and the length of time depends on how large the company's topology is and what the client's demands are."

"The areas around security, such as protection, need to be included."

"Workflows could be simplified."

"The ability to preview files in different formats should be expanded to include formats such as embedded postscript (EPS), AutoCAD, and Adobe Acrobat PDF."

"Making it more intuitive could help teams adopt it faster and use it more effectively by being more user-friendly."

"The solution needs to enable better sharing capabilities between users and external users. Several users also have problems with linking their emails to their Microsoft account."

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server cons

"Flexibility and extensibility, above everything, could be improved."

"The initial setup process is not intuitive."

"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."

"Make it more intuitive."

"The product must provide more automation."

"SharePoint sometimes cannot handle the amount of co-editing that we do."

"Workflow is something that can become more intelligent."

"The areas of this solution that need improvement are the relationships between lists, cross-site web parts, and page-building tools."

More SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are some aggressive discounts offered by Microsoft for organizations that are not for profit, which we are, and it makes it quite attractive to consider."

"It can be expensive for on-premises deployments, especially when you have to support SQL Server as your backend database. That's where the cost comes into play. SQL Server has its own licensing, which Microsoft keeps on changing. Therefore, it can become costly. In the earlier versions of SharePoint, version 2007 or 2010, they had an express version where the SQL Server licensing was free. It wasn't like a full-blown SharePoint. It was only a slimmed-down version. It used to be whatever your hardware costs. You would install the free software and work with it, but you were very limited in what you could do in SharePoint. If you wanted the SharePoint Enterprise Server with all the bells and whistles, then you had to pay more to get the SQL Server license based on the number of users or servers. The subscription model is different for cloud deployments. Licensing is per user and per month. The cost also depends on the storage required. If you have a lot of sites or documents, then you need to expand it based on your needs."

"One of the reasons why we don't recommend the cloud version of SharePoint is the cost. With the on premise version, you pay for the license once. For the cloud version, there is a recurring fee. It is very expensive. They expect everyone to pay $20 or $30 per user per month."

"Pricing plans may be flexible depending on volume usage and your corporate relationship with Microsoft."

"Licensing can be by server or by seat."

"The pricing is competitive."

"It is pretty reasonable. It is $5 per month per user. We have 12 users now, so it is about $60 per month."

"The pricing works for us."

"For this type of solution, it is not wise to buy it without Software Assurance."

"The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."

"The licensing model for SharePoint Online is based on per user, and it is monthly. The price of the solution overall is good."

"As usual, Microsoft’s licensing structures don’t really seem to fit the needs of their products. This leads to always paying for a project you will never use fully or always be adding to."

More SharePoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8925

Developer with 51-200 employees

Aug 23, 2013

Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons

At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	79
Midsize Enterprise	38
Large Enterprise	81

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Office SharePoint Server?

The price of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is affordable for us.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Office SharePoint Server?

There are areas that could be improved with Microsoft Office SharePoint Server. My company has more than 5,000 collaborators. The question of how Microsoft Office SharePoint Server can be a better ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Office SharePoint Server?

The regular use cases with Microsoft Office SharePoint Server are to share files and to plug them into websites in collaboration features from Office 365. The advanced search functionality is accep...

See all answers

What do you like most about SharePoint?

The search feature is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?

As SharePoint is part of the Microsoft 365 suite, the pricing is acceptable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SharePoint?

Not with SharePoint specifically, but overall with the software or tools from Microsoft, I think there are areas that need improvement. It's very difficult to understand the objective. There are so...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon WorkDocs vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Compared 41% of the time

Datto Workplace vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Compared 11% of the time

Hitachi Content Platform Anywhere vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Beehive vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Compared 7% of the time

FileCloud vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Competitors

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 8% of the time

DocuSign vs SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

Box vs SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

IBM FileNet vs SharePoint

Compared 5% of the time

More SharePoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

October 2025

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server report

Download Microsoft Office SharePoint Server product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePoint

October 2025

Download SharePoint product report

Also Known As

Office SharePoint Server, MS Office SharePoint Server

SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010

Overview

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) is a Microsoft software portal based on the ASP.NET framework. MOSS facilitates file sharing and collaboration, social networking, Web databases and Web publishing. It is hosted by Microsoft Windows Server and is accessible through Microsoft Office or the Web.

Microsoft

SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Del Monte Foods, Unicredit Leasing, Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, Nokia Czech Republic, Perkins Eastman, JLL, ICA, óxito Software, Dorset Software, PKP Cargo, Arcapita Bank B.S.C., AVE CZ, Chesapeake Energy

Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. SharePoint

March 2020

Free Report: Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. SharePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. SharePoint report.

We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.