No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Exchange vs Waterford Technologies File Archiver comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Exchange
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
95
Ranking in other categories
Email Applications (3rd), Wireless Email (2nd)
Waterford Technologies File...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
File Archiving (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Microsoft Exchange and Waterford Technologies File Archiver aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Microsoft Exchange is designed for Email Applications and holds a mindshare of 7.2%, down 11.3% compared to last year.
Waterford Technologies File Archiver, on the other hand, focuses on File Archiving, holds 4.3% mindshare, down 8.4% since last year.
Email Applications Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Exchange7.2%
Google Workspace16.6%
Amazon WorkMail10.4%
Other65.8%
Email Applications
File Archiving Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Waterford Technologies File Archiver4.3%
Veritas Enterprise Vault10.5%
OpenText Content Manager6.8%
Other78.4%
File Archiving
 

Featured Reviews

AS
Bookkeeper at FCA - Victoria Point
Reliable email service has supported consistent communication and improved user training
I do use Cisco Secure Email, Grafis, and Proofpoint Email Protection when needed, but we were using Proofpoint before, and we are no longer using it. I am currently using Microsoft Exchange as our email solution. We are a client of Microsoft; there is no partnership between my company and Microsoft. My experience with Microsoft Exchange is as good as the generic email. I do not use Microsoft Exchange to synchronize emails across devices, and it is not part of my workflow. The protocols I mostly use with Microsoft Exchange for integration are SMTP. I do not use the shared calendars feature in Microsoft Exchange. Data loss prevention is something we are not really using or utilizing at the moment. My overall review rating for Microsoft Exchange is 8.
Use Waterford Technologies File Archiver?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Applications solutions are best for your needs.
912,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Construction Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business43
Midsize Enterprise28
Large Enterprise35
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Zimbra Collaboration compare with Microsoft Exchange?
Zimbra is a free, open source collaborative software suite. The features I like best are the ease of integration and the email, calendar, and collaboration server with web interface. In addition, I...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Exchange?
I am aware of pricing aspects, and I would say it is affordable for what it is.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Exchange?
I see some drawbacks and areas for improvement; the quarantining is not fantastic. I think the quarantining is not fantastic because it lets a lot of spam through, and when it is notified of spam, ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Exchange, MS Exchange
File Archiver
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Paderborn-Lippstadt Airport, Scitec Nutrition, British Airways, InnoGames, Osteology Foundation, Franz Haniel & Cie. GmbH, NTC Contracting
Savenet Solutions, William Fry, LifeCare, Sydney Swans
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Email Applications. Updated: September 2026.
912,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.