We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)."The solution offers very good upgrades and updates regularly."
"It's a flexible solution."
"The most valuable feature is the interface."
"Microsoft Azure has thousands of services and products."
"It's set up to handle any cloud requirement."
"I have found the solution to be flexible, easy to use, and the documents are straightforward to understand."
"It is easy to deploy."
"It's very scalable. We can scale up to 80-85% without issues."
"The most valuable features are the manageability and the user interface."
"What I like most about Oracle Cloud Platform is the ease of getting data in and out of the cloud, and the affordable licensing."
"There is ROI with the product's use."
"The security on the solution is very good."
"The pricing of the solution is pretty good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a cloud-based solution."
"It is a stable solution since it offers a very powerful performance to its users."
"The product is scalable."
"It should have cost optimization tools. Customers are required to use third-party applications to avoid usage complications."
"One area where Microsoft Azure could improve is in offering a broader range of pre-built plugins and tools compared to AWS."
"Their backup strategy is a little complex which racks up the VM to other sole storage areas. This should be improved."
"The solution is less mature than AWS."
"The initial setup can be improved."
"They should include a cybersecurity feature to improve the protection of the systems. They could do better in terms of the pricing model. Its price keeps on changing. Their technical support can also be better."
"We need more customization and support for doing so."
"They are a bit closed on the customization side. If they open the customization then it will be very good."
"Sometimes when we install something, we need to partition and maybe rebuild the index. This can cause some issues for performance. In the future, I would like to see more stability and fewer bugs."
"There's a need for further customization to unlock the platform's full potential."
"Areas that need improvement are the pricing and the support."
"More technical papers could be published to help out professionals."
"The product’s pricing should be reduced."
"Oracle Cloud is not a user-friendly tool. From an improvement perspective, I want Oracle Cloud to be more user-friendly."
"The setup was not simple."
"Specific to the Oracle Cloud; while they have been able to showcase inbuilt features for Oracle applications, what doesn't really come across clearly is what happens when you want to host, work with, or integrate with applications outside of the Oracle stack."
More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 299 reviews while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is ranked 3rd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 91 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) writes "Cost-effective and can be used to host OIC and APEX". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, Pivotal Cloud Foundry, SAP Cloud Platform and Alibaba Cloud, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is most compared with Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, IBM Public Cloud, OpenShift and Alibaba Cloud.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors and best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.