Microsoft Analytics Platform System vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

Microsoft and Broadcom are both solutions in the Data Warehouse category. Microsoft is ranked #20, while Broadcom is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5. Microsoft holds a 2.2% mindshare in Data Warehouse, compared to Broadcom’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Analytics Platfor...

Read 9 Microsoft Analytics Platform System reviews

1,248 Views
886 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 85 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

7,363 Views
2,503 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Microsoft Analytics Platfor...

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and Microsoft Analytics Platform System are competing in the data analytics and management market. While VMware Tanzu focuses on modern application development and portability, Microsoft Analytics Platform System has the upper hand due to its strong analytics capabilities and seamless integration within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Features: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions provides a robust platform for cloud-native application development, efficient data layer management, and emphasizes scalability and flexibility. Microsoft Analytics Platform System leverages comprehensive analytics tools like advanced query handling, integration with other Microsoft services, and offers seamless data processing experience.

Room for Improvement: VMware Tanzu could enhance its integration with external data sources, refine data indexing features, and expand support for analytics tools. Microsoft Analytics Platform System could improve the user interface for beginners, offer more flexible deployment models, and simplify integration with non-Microsoft technologies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu provides a container-based deployment model suitable for diverse environments and dedicated support for cloud-native applications. Microsoft Analytics Platform System offers a pre-configured appliance that reduces deployment complexity for on-premises scenarios and maintains consistent customer support.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions offers a scalable pricing model aligned with cloud-native architecture, potentially resulting in higher ROI for businesses focused on cloud development. Microsoft Analytics Platform System features an upfront cost structure, providing substantial long-term value for organizations leveraging the Microsoft stack.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Analytics Platform System vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Analytics Platform System vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,668 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Analytics Platfor...

Ranking in Data Warehouse

20th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Data Warehouse

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (5th), Relational Databases Tools (14th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Microsoft Analytics Platform System is 2.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 4.8%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Warehouse Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions	4.8%
Microsoft Analytics Platform System	2.2%
Other	93.0%

Data Warehouse

Featured Reviews

MahmoudMohamed1

Senior Data Engineer at Tatweer Educational Technologies Company - TETCO

Offers smooth data integration between systems, but requires better real-time analytics capabilities

We leverage its capabilities for many applications. We can integrate with our databases, like Oracle, MySQL, or any other, using Microsoft Integration Services. This lets us continue using private databases without paying additional licensing fees. Additionally, the license includes Analytics services and Power BI, which work on-premises, unlike most other technologies that require cloud solutions.

Read full review

Karthik Shivaram

Sr. Manager at STI INFOTECH PVT LTD

Improved multi-cloud data management has simplified operations and supports seamless Kubernetes

From my perspective, the biggest challenge with VMware right now is the pricing. To be very honest, in many cases I find myself recommending alternative solutions instead of VMware. Even if those alternatives come with a bit more complexity, customers are often more willing to accept that than the current VMware pricing model. In the past, VMware used a socket-based licensing model, which was easier for customers to understand and budget for. Now the shift to a core-based licensing model has significantly increased costs for many environments, especially for organizations running modern high-core CPUs. One positive aspect of the new model is that VMware has bundled several components together. For example, earlier when deploying vSphere, customers also had to purchase vCenter separately for management. Now multiple components are packaged into a single SKU, which simplifies some aspects of procurement and deployment. While this consolidation has its benefits, the overall licensing and commercial costs remain very high. Pricing is not the only issue. I believe Broadcom also needs to reconsider its strategy in light of the current market conditions. The approach they are taking may be strategic from a business perspective, but from what I see in the field, it is leading to lost opportunities. Many customers who previously relied on VMware are now actively exploring alternative virtualization platforms. I’m not sure where this direction will ultimately lead, but based on my experience, it is already affecting adoption. Since you’ve been trying to reach me for some time—and we also had a discussion a couple of years ago—I hope this feedback helps Broadcom understand the current sentiment in the market and potentially make adjustments. Another important concern is the way features are bundled. In many cases, customers only need basic virtualization and high availability capabilities. However, the current packaging often includes additional features that they may not need. A good analogy is that if a customer only needs an entry-level car, we shouldn’t be forced to sell them a Rolls-Royce. VMware could benefit from adopting a more modular or à la carte licensing model, where customers can choose only the components they truly require. For example, if a customer only needs core virtualization functionality, they should be able to purchase just that. This would allow partners and solution providers to better align solutions with customer requirements and position VMware more competitively in the market. Another challenge I want to highlight is the pricing model based on U.S. dollars and the way multi-year licensing is handled. In many enterprise and government projects, customers prefer to commit to three-year or five-year licenses and pay the full amount upfront. However, in approximately 20% of the deals I work on, we lose opportunities because VMware only provides dollar-based pricing for the first year. When it comes to the following years, the contract requires renewals annually rather than allowing a fixed multi-year upfront payment. This approach is particularly problematic for government and public sector customers. Many of them are ready and willing to pay for three or five years in advance, but the current VMware model does not support that structure effectively. Because pricing is tied to the U.S. dollar and subject to yearly adjustments, VMware does not lock in pricing for the full term. From a customer’s perspective, this introduces uncertainty and makes procurement more complicated. Ideally, if a price is quoted—for example, $100 per year—it should remain consistent across a multi-year agreement. Customers would be comfortable committing to a five-year term if the price were fixed and predictable. Unfortunately, that flexibility is currently not available across VMware products, whether it is vSphere, VMware Tanzu solutions, or other offerings. For large enterprise environments, one-year commitments are usually not practical. Many enterprise customers prefer longer-term agreements for budgeting and procurement reasons. Even when they are willing to accept the higher cost associated with the core-based licensing model, the lack of a clear multi-year upfront option often becomes a deal-breaker.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We leverage its capabilities for many applications. We can integrate with our databases, like Oracle, MySQL, or any other, using Microsoft Integration Services."

"This solution will connect to any database, you can combine databases, and you can create a cube or tabular model."

"Microsoft Analytics Platform System's most valuable feature is its ecosystems and seamless integration with other Microsoft reporting platforms and databases."

"We help customers in many ways from customized analysis for detection of anomalies in tax, operations, customer relationship, and marketing campaigns, and we also use mining and ML to help them discover trends, which provides useful information based on their business."

"This solution will connect to any database, you can combine databases, and you can create a cube or tabular model."

"The result is a highly flexible, affordable, and scalable platform that makes large-scale Hub and Spoke EDW architectures a practical reality."

"By combining both Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse (PDW) and unstructured Hadoop analytical capabilities in a single, easy-to-manage EDW appliance, Microsoft APS is well positioned to help organizations use information to enhance their competitive position."

"I like that it's integrated with other Azure products."

More Microsoft Analytics Platform System pros

"The security is great."

"RabbitMQ will help to remove a lot of the complexities and create a loosely coupled codebase."

"It's one of the fastest databases in the market. It's easy to use. From a maintenance perspective it's a good product. The segmentation, or architecture of the product is different than other databases such as Oracle. So even in 10 years, the data distribution for such segments will not affect other segments. The query performance of the product, for complex queries, is very good. It has good integration with Hadoop."

"I would recommend this product; it is great and resolves a lot of problems."

"This has improved our daily load process reducing the run time at least by three to four hours which made other departments within the organization to look for data from the Enterprise Data Warehouse."

"It's allowed us to do a lot of data analytics with it that we weren't able to do before."

"The solution has really cool features to use. Its management console is excellent. You can utilize plugins to view the performance of the whole service on one network."

"The reports are running very fast, a matter of minutes instead of hours as it was previously."

Cons

"We need better real-time analytics capabilities. It's a bit challenging for us."

"In general, I am not really very satisfied with the tutorials that are out there."

"On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate this product overall as a five. This is probably because there is still a lot of room for improvement, features that other products have that are missing, and a lot of open-source technology nowadays that are very good and people can use instead."

"Releases of new products and functionality is never accompanied by associated documentation, training and resources that adequately explain the release."

"However, centralized EDW tends to be extremely expensive and very inflexible."

"Hybrid environments are complex to manage."

"Functionality needs to be more up-to-date with competing products."

"The trouble is Microsoft has changed their licensing. It's an extremely expensive product now."

More Microsoft Analytics Platform System cons

"Support for Windows systems needs to improve."

"The pricing is very high. To be honest, instead of VMware products, I am pushing other products."

"Improve the ability to handle the large message load."

"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."

"Initial setup is a little complex. It took around two weeks to deploy."

"Implementation takes a long time."

"If messages pile up until the space of the memory is full, then basically, the cluster goes down, and someone has to log in through the backend and purge all messages."

"The product is pretty hard to configure."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Users have to pay extra for premium-level technical support."

"We are currently paying $200,000 a year for all the different parts of the suite during an ingest model Microsoft now charges us $700,000 a year."

"I rate Microsoft Analytics Platform System a seven out of ten for pricing."

"The initial price is lower than Oracle, but extensive use of SQL may lead to a higher total cost of ownership."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."

"Pricing is good compared to other products. It's fine."

"It is an open-source product."

"are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."

"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."

"It is the best product with best fit for price/performance customer objectives."

"The price is pretty good."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,668 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for VMware RabbitMQ?

We use it to achieve what we call asynchronous processing. Asynchronous processing is where applications need to communicate with each other, but they don't need to rely on failures, maybe network ...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware Tanzu GemFire?

The product has been stable and I have never faced any kind of problems with it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle Exadata vs Microsoft Analytics Platform System

Compared 10% of the time

Teradata vs Microsoft Analytics Platform System

Compared 9% of the time

SAP BW4HANA vs Microsoft Analytics Platform System

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics vs Microsoft Analytics Platform System

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Lake Formation vs Microsoft Analytics Platform System

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Analytics Platform System Competitors

Oracle Exadata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

Nutanix Database Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

ActiveMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

IBM MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Teradata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Analytics Platform System

April 2026

Microsoft Analytics Platform System report

Download Microsoft Analytics Platform System product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

April 2026

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

Microsoft APS, MS Analytics Platform System

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

Microsoft Analytics Platform System integrates with Microsoft ecosystem, connecting databases and offering advanced Cube Solution for analytics. It provides cost-effective end-to-end capabilities with multiple features under one license.

Microsoft Analytics Platform System offers seamless integration with Azure products, and its tools enhance flexibility and compatibility across different services and scenarios. While it provides comprehensive BI charts and data warehousing capabilities, users have noted that support and documentation need improvements, especially in hybrid environments. The system's machine learning and AI could be more user-friendly, and real-time analytics require enhancements. Handling permissions and data ingestion are cost-intensive, posing challenges for non-technical teams.

What are the key features of Microsoft Analytics Platform System?

Seamless Microsoft Ecosystem Integration: Connects efficiently with Microsoft products.
Advanced Cube Solution: Facilitates multidimensional analytics.
Comprehensive End-to-End Capabilities: Covers all analytics needs with one license.
Rich BI Charts: Offers diverse visualization options for insights.
Azure Product Compatibility: Enhances cloud-based analytics and flexibility.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Cost-Effective Solution: Multiple features under one license reduce expenses.
Enhanced Productivity: Supports high-level decision-making and operational insights.
Versatility: Suitable for both cloud and on-premise deployments.
Improved Collaboration: Diverse tools aid project execution and teamwork.

In industries such as finance, telecom, and healthcare, Microsoft Analytics Platform System is used for multi-dimensional analysis and business intelligence. It supports predictive analytics, report generation, and server monitoring within Azure settings. Users leverage it for data integration and decision-making, allowing extensive project execution with its suite of tools.

Microsoft

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Transport for London, E-Plus Mobilfunk GmbH & Co. KG, Prometeia, Tangerine, SSM Health Care, Service Corporation International

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Analytics Platform System vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

May 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Analytics Platform System vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Analytics Platform System vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,668 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Analytics Platform System vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.

We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.