• Home
  • Objective ECM vs. OpenText Content Manager

Objective ECM vs OpenText Content Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Objective Logo

Objective ECM

Read 1 Objective ECM review
561 views|515 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo

OpenText Content Manager

Read 21 OpenText Content Manager reviews
1,921 views|881 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Objective ECM and OpenText Content Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
The ability to have duplicate document names is very useful for content migration. During trouble-shooting you will discover that the logs are all over the place.
Anonymous User
Researched Objective ECM but chose OpenText Content Manager: We create custom reports using the print merge functionality.
Official records are managed, thereby being able to identify information that cannot be disposed; managing the lifecycle; and locating our records.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I would suggest that you do a thorough evaluation of all competing products and look for support for these products in your local area."
  • "The fees incurred are for the licensing and maintenance."
  • "I rate the product price an eight or nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The solution is expensive."
  • "The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs."

    • More OpenText Content Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Micro Focus Content Manager?
    Top Answer:An advantage is integration with your IP directory.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Conte...
    Top Answer:The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs. You will have to pay more… more »
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Micro Focus Content Manager?
    Top Answer:Support could be enhanced. The first line of support consists of individuals who lack experience with some key aspects. When you create a support ticket, the time to resolve the issue may be prolonged… more »
    Read all 7 answers   →
    Ranking
    16th
    out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
    Views
    561
    Comparisons
    515
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    10th
    out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
    Views
    1,921
    Comparisons
    881
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    410
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager
    Learn More
    Objective
    OpenText
    Overview

    Objective ECM is a comprehensive suite of modules that connects content to people and the business systems they work with on a daily basis. Designed to maximise user adoption with zero training, Objective ECM delivers a simple, fast and personal experience that can be shared on a vast scale.

    OpenText Content Manager, formerly Records Manager, is a governance-based enterprise content management system designed to help government agencies, regulated industries and global organizations manage their business content from creation to disposal. Regardless of how you create and collaborate on your content, Content Manager gives you the ability to leverage accurate, contextual, and complete information throughout its lifecycle. Managing your content in this way helps you significantly improve services to your customers, business decisions and insight for future strategy.

    Sample Customers
    ACT Planning and Land Authority, Australian Department of Defence, Barwon Water, City of Darebin, Delta Electricity, NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, Health Corporate Network, Hobsons Bay City Council, LandCorp, Port of Brisbane
    Missouri State Courts
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government33%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm8%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Government58%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Non Profit8%
    Non Tech Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government21%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise35%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise55%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Objective ECM is ranked 16th in Enterprise Content Management while OpenText Content Manager is ranked 10th in Enterprise Content Management with 21 reviews. Objective ECM is rated 4.0, while OpenText Content Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Objective ECM writes "The ability to have duplicate document names is very useful for content migration. During trouble-shooting you will discover that the logs are all over the place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Content Manager writes "A document management system that integrates well with SAP, Salesforce and Oracle ". Objective ECM is most compared with SharePoint and Atlassian Confluence, whereas OpenText Content Manager is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, OpenText Documentum, IBM FileNet and Box.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.