Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE comparison

Juniper and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Juniper is ranked #46 with an average rating of 9.0, while NETSCOUT is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5. Juniper holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.
Marvis Virtual Network Assi...
Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews
  • 222 Views
  • 140 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
Read 49 NETSCOUT nGeniusONE reviews
  • 2,483 Views
  • 1,733 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024
```html

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant compete in the network management space. Marvis is preferred for its innovative AI-powered features, while NETSCOUT excels in cost and support.

Features: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE offers deep visibility into network traffic, comprehensive performance analytics, and effective troubleshooting. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant provides AI-driven insights, proactive issue resolution, and a user-centric design, employing automation for advanced problem-solving.

Room for Improvement: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE can improve by integrating more AI features, enhancing its user interface, and streamlining update processes. Marvis could broaden hardware compatibility, offer more traditional deployment options, and reduce costs to improve accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE has a structured deployment process with robust support services focused on seamless integration. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant's cloud-based model allows for rapid deployment with minimal on-site setup, prioritizing reduced complexity for easier adoption.

Pricing and ROI: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE uses a traditional licensing model, appealing to larger organizations with predictable costs, while Marvis Virtual Network Assistant may require a higher initial investment but promises better long-term ROI due to its efficiencies.

```
DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
46th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
19th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is 1.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

PRADIPJOSHI - PeerSpot reviewer
Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence
I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Read full review
Ruslan Melnyk - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for network performance monitoring
My manager can explain the use cases attached to the product. I am a unit leader in my company, and I don't sell the product directly to our partners or customers. In my company, I manage certain processes and a team while building, developing, and providing them with a direction for the market. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is a good solution for network performance monitoring since it is not cloud-based. My company sells NETSCOUT nGeniusONE in eight to ten countries. I think the solution is not good for capacity planning, but it is better to help find problems in applications because not every infrastructure is good at managing working applications. I think it is a solution meant for applications. The tool is useful for solving problems attached to applications. The tool's real-time network monitoring capability was used when the product was more reactive. In our company, if we use real-time monitoring, then we need to deal with raw traffic. In our company, if we don't see any problem in the real-time systems, we have the possibility to rely on the tool since it acts like a time machine for us, which can allow us to get back to the areas of problem and solve them. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. For many users, it can be a good monitoring system that can be scaled up in the future. I think it is a good product to start with when working systems in an environment. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is another tool used to manage raw traffic, and I find it to integrate well into our customers' network. I am not using it actively on the system. I use the tool for network packet brokers. I rate the tool a ten out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."
"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."
"The installation process is straightforward."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is being able to drill down into any kind of troubles that are reported to us, by use of identifiers."
"The valuable features include packet analysis, packet capture, and [that] it's easy to use."
"The system's ability to prevent downtime represents a significant return on investment, but I do not have specific numerical data."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Network faults are easily and quickly identified through dashboards and drill down."
"The visual and graphical interfaces in the display that it provides for us to show our senior leadership. We can show them what is actually happening, instead of a spreadsheet."
More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE pros
 

Cons

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."
"It should add real-time application visibility."
"I would like to see improvement in the user experience. It's hard to manage it. We need a dedicated, highly-qualified person, compared to similar tools. Obviously, it's in a higher bracket, salary-wise. That's something the NETSCOUT team needs to focus on. It's a completely niche-skill technology, where we need to have the skills to manage, maintain, and deploy it."
"Another thing that would help out is if they packaged the NetFlow monitor into nGeniusONE. Their NetFlow monitor works with nGeniusONE where you can actually get the netflow of pretty much anything you hook it up to. But it's a separate box that you have to buy. If there was a way that could package that into nGeniusONE, it would be a complete package straight out of the box."
"NETSCOUT nGeniusONE's pricing is higher compared to the competitors. It is more than 15-18 percent of competitor costs. It also needs to add AI features."
"This is a typical thing, but every time they do a major code upgrade, we get hit with some nasty bugs. Some of them literally stop the whole platform from collecting traffic data. They should really do more Q&A on the software stability before release."
"I would like more in-depth convergence between all the applications, especially when I look for information through a data mine."
"NG1 has been stable for a while in our environment - at least we have what we needed. But with nBA, there's a lot of room for improvement."
"The feature I am looking for is the Arbor technology, especially to run in parallel with our firewall... It's getting there."
"The single pane of glass view is a challenge. I like the graphics, they're easy to understand, but when more digging is required, it's more complicated to get what I'm expecting."
More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."
"The scalability becomes very expensive quickly."
"Cost is probably the biggest drawback. Compared to some of the newer vendors that have popped up in the space, it's definitely more on the expensive side... [But] it's been able to keep its value, even in the face of the cheaper competition."
"Like any company, we always want better pricing. The pricing is okay, but it's not a cheap solution. When you want to deploy it across an enterprise as large as ours, you go into seven figures. It's not a cheap solution to get out there."
"The product is too expensive compared to other products."
"The license becomes cost prohibitive very quickly."
"There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges attached to the product. The product may come across as a cheap tool for some, while it may seem costly for others."
"I rate the price of NETSCOUT nGeniusONE a four out of five."
"The price is only for acquisition; it's not a licence."
More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Retailer
14%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Educational Organization
10%
Healthcare Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?
It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?
It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...
See all answers
Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?
I would say if it’s an ISP that will build a scrubbing center, Netscout/Arbor is a good solution. In all other solutions, Imperva is a great choice.
See all answers
What do you like most about NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?
The pricing is a bit high yet not overly expensive. The cost depends on the size of the customer, as sizing controls the pricing.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Logo
ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant
Compared 42% of the time
Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Logo
Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant
Compared 30% of the time
Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Logo
Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant
Compared 28% of the time
More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors
Dynatrace vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Logo
Dynatrace vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
Compared 13% of the time
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Logo
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
Compared 10% of the time
ThousandEyes vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Logo
ThousandEyes vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
Compared 9% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
Compared 8% of the time
Ixia Network Packet Brokers vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Logo
Ixia Network Packet Brokers vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
Compared 5% of the time
More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
April 2025
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reportDownload Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report
Buyer's Guide
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
April 2025
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE reportDownload NETSCOUT nGeniusONE product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
NETSCOUT nGenius, nGeniusONE
 

Overview

Marvis is the first network assistant in the industry to bring conversational AI to networking, transforming the way IT teams interact and engage with enterprise networks. In the era of AIOps, Marvis delivers streamlined operations, simplified troubleshooting, and remarkable user experiences.

Juniper
The nGenius Real-Time Monitor software provides you with tools to monitor and display information about your network both historically and in real time. The nGenius Real-Time Monitor software allows you to understand your current network usage and to plan for future needs. It also allows you to proactively troubleshoot problem areas in your network.
NETSCOUT
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Cerner Corporation
Buyer's Guide
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
April 2025
Free Report: Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
Find out what your peers are saying about Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.