Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE comparison

Juniper and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Juniper is ranked #46 with an average rating of 9.0, while NETSCOUT is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.7. Juniper holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

635 Views
584 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Read 51 NETSCOUT nGeniusONE reviews

3,630 Views
2,650 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

```html

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant compete in the network management space. Marvis is preferred for its innovative AI-powered features, while NETSCOUT excels in cost and support.

Features: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE offers deep visibility into network traffic, comprehensive performance analytics, and effective troubleshooting. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant provides AI-driven insights, proactive issue resolution, and a user-centric design, employing automation for advanced problem-solving.

Room for Improvement: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE can improve by integrating more AI features, enhancing its user interface, and streamlining update processes. Marvis could broaden hardware compatibility, offer more traditional deployment options, and reduce costs to improve accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE has a structured deployment process with robust support services focused on seamless integration. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant's cloud-based model allows for rapid deployment with minimal on-site setup, prioritizing reduced complexity for easier adoption.

Pricing and ROI: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE uses a traditional licensing model, appealing to larger organizations with predictable costs, while Marvis Virtual Network Assistant may require a higher initial investment but promises better long-term ROI due to its efficiencies.

```

To learn more, read our detailed Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,176 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

46th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

29th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is 1.2%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE	1.2%
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant	0.4%
Other	98.4%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

PRADIPJOSHI

Owner at a transportation company with 11-50 employees

Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence

I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

EdwardShim

General Manager at MOCOMSYS

Offers detailed network monitoring but requires improvement in deployment complexity and pricing

The price is really high, making it difficult for many financial companies to purchase immediately; it will take time for them to afford any budget for the purchase. The traffic data correlation feature's effectiveness with performance issues for clients remains uncertain as there are questions that need to be addressed through engineers regarding how many customers are actually using it. Regarding pricing and value for money, while the solution has the potential to save time and money for clients in the long term, monitoring solutions for performance management or network monitoring do not cause immediate damage to a company. It could lead to damage over time, but financial and management teams typically cannot see the immediate crisis. This is why many big companies Samsung and Hyundai try to build their own monitoring solutions using open-source tools and their own engineers, though it has not been successful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

"If one of our network pipes is getting plugged up by somebody using too much bandwidth, we can use the NETSCOUT tool to examine and find out what is going on."

"The fact that it's able to capture and store packets from the wires is very useful for troubleshooting with our vendors, when issues do come up. It's valuable that we have that overall data for them."

"With the Vprobes, we quickly identified issues on the application servers, which we normally couldn't, where it usually would be a full circle round between our NOC and server people."

"It gives me the MOS, latency, and jitter."

"When we have any type of outage, and we dig into it, we are able to tell what the root cause is instead of having to go through Wireshark, etc."

"The quick drill-down views are similar to Wireshark views. Those are quite nice, with the views on how you interpret some of the data. The granularity of how far you can drill down into milliseconds or microseconds is a very nice feature. It actually stores quite a lot of data in its database."

"The valuable features include packet analysis, packet capture, and [that] it's easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is being able to drill down into any kind of troubles that are reported to us, by use of identifiers."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE pros

Cons

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"It should add real-time application visibility."

"We would like better end-to-end data flows. This is something that my users always complain about, as they don't know what the data flows are on the network. We would like to know every point along the line."

"The scalability needs some work. From a probe perspective, we are limited to a certain amount of throughput on the devices themselves. Without having actual hooks into the bare metal hardware for the solutions, it's a bit of a "thumb in the air" as to when we hit our capacity or when our high watermark is."

"NETSCOUT nGeniusONE's pricing is higher compared to the competitors. It is more than 15-18 percent of competitor costs. It also needs to add AI features."

"Our biggest area of concern right now, supporting the applications, is that while NETSCOUT does a good job of monitoring the network and the applications, we need more visibility into system health and performance monitoring."

"Datadog is more stable than NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, being a SaaS-based solution compared to on-prem solutions like NETSCOUT."

"I would love to have them reassemble fragmented packets. That would be a very big plus in my book."

"The initial deployment is tedious and requires a lot of build, deployment and configuration time. Experience is key to a successful deployment."

"I would like more in-depth convergence between all the applications, especially when I look for information through a data mine."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

"Their pricing is very competitive with other solutions... But what I like about NETSCOUT's licensing is that it's shared across all their platforms. They don't create a new licensing scheme for every one of their products. So for nGeniusONE, you buy a certain license level, and it works on all of their products."

"The product is too expensive compared to other products."

"The license becomes cost prohibitive very quickly."

"This solution has saved us more than $50,000 a month and freed up 30 percent of our bandwidth."

"The scalability becomes very expensive quickly."

"It can be expensive, but if you have a good configuration, based on what you are looking for, it's okay, it's manageable."

"If you are able and you are willing to use everything that Netscout provides to you, it's probably a relatively fair price. The problem is that it's such a large and such a complex tool that I'm not sure that many companies would be able to use it entirely, the way it's expected to be used."

"Cost is probably the biggest drawback. Compared to some of the newer vendors that have popped up in the space, it's definitely more on the expensive side... [But] it's been able to keep its value, even in the face of the cheaper competition."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

22%

Retailer

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	37

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...

See all answers

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

I would say if it’s an ISP that will build a scrubbing center, Netscout/Arbor is a good solution. In all other solutions, Imperva is a great choice.

See all answers

What do you like most about NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?

Regarding its high price, I give NETSCOUT nGeniusONE a seven.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 38% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 27% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 23% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 13% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 10% of the time

Dynatrace vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 8% of the time

ThousandEyes vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 7% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 5% of the time

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2026

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

January 2026

Download NETSCOUT nGeniusONE product report

Also Known As

No data available

NETSCOUT nGenius, nGeniusONE

Overview

Marvis is the first network assistant in the industry to bring conversational AI to networking, transforming the way IT teams interact and engage with enterprise networks. In the era of AIOps, Marvis delivers streamlined operations, simplified troubleshooting, and remarkable user experiences.

Juniper

The nGenius Real-Time Monitor software provides you with tools to monitor and display information about your network both historically and in real time. The nGenius Real-Time Monitor software allows you to understand your current network usage and to plan for future needs. It also allows you to proactively troubleshoot problem areas in your network.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cerner Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

December 2025

Free Report: Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Find out what your peers are saying about Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.